07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

formation are typically marshaled by the ideologies of the respective groups of<br />

canonizers. In the 1790s and 1800s, the most pervasive ideology was that which was<br />

operating under the tenets of early Romanticism. In his analysis of how the processes of<br />

reception of the Gothic shape the production of Romantic texts, Gamer shows the ways in<br />

which “[the] popular/critical dualism [of Romantic ideology] can operate in a culture<br />

where individuals often occupy both halves of it simultaneously by reading, reviewing,<br />

and writing Gothic texts” (25).<br />

106<br />

Another wave of ideological criticism was spurred by the traceable influence of<br />

the German Shauer-Romantik (horror-Romantic) tradition in Lewis’ The Monk and other<br />

novels that were inspired by Lewis’ example. As a matter of fact, Watt points out that<br />

the term “‘German’ was much more current than ‘Gothic’ in the 1790s” (70). The import<br />

of Germanic elements into national literature as pioneered by Lewis was regarded as an<br />

“invasion” which degraded “the English Genius” (Watt 68). Although many Romantics<br />

revered earlier German works, 12 Gothic works that were influenced by the Shauer-<br />

Romantik emerged at a time of political upheaval and social uncertainty, where anything<br />

foreign was dubbed suspicious. Watt refers to the Illuminati controversy of the end of the<br />

century to point out that “a mythical Germany became associated with a deluded<br />

revolutionary idealism, almost to the same extent as France, and ‘German’ fiction became<br />

almost universally associated with a potentially dangerous excess” (68). In sum, the<br />

ideological resistance to the Gothic was spurred not only by the fact that it prompted<br />

certain shifts in the traditional literary conventions of purpose, audience, and reader-<br />

response patterns, but also by its affiliations with more generally perceived threats<br />

12 Coleridge, for example, praised the work of Schiller

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!