07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distinct transgressions: the author crossed established conventions by defining his work<br />

against the prevailing paradigms of genre and content. On the one hand, the use of<br />

German-influenced “horror” and other Gothic literary devices clearly sets the work<br />

against the aesthetics of its Lake <strong>School</strong> contemporaries, while on the other, the explicit<br />

depiction of acts of sexual and violent behavior made it vulnerable to attacks spawned by<br />

conventional morality. As mentioned earlier, The Monk illustrates rather well the three<br />

categories of transgression: it simultaneously breaks taboos, rejects accepted artistic<br />

practices, and challenges political economies by producing shock, creating controversy,<br />

and being potentially subversive.<br />

112<br />

As briefly suggested above, within the specifics of the Gothic, The Monk stands<br />

out particularly in contrast to the more popular novels of Ann Radcliffe. To this effect,<br />

James Watt contends that as a genre, Gothic fiction is "constituted or structured by the<br />

often antagonistic relations between different writers and works" (6). It is widely<br />

recognized that there are two stages in the development of the Gothic: one established by<br />

Radcliffe, who molded it to popular favor, was either labeled “terror-Gothic” and/or<br />

“loyalist,” considered “feminine,” and drew its inspiration from French sensationalism<br />

and Elizabethan Dramatists and the second, embodied by Lewis, who was influenced by<br />

German stories, which was labeled “horror-Gothic” and was first praised for its<br />

“masculinity” and “vigor,” before finally being considered as immoral and scandalous,<br />

obscene and perfidious, seditious and revolutionary.<br />

The contrast between the two writers is obvious in their approach to the Gothic,<br />

and more particularly, in the explicitness of content and in their usage of certain Gothic<br />

conventions. There is also a notable difference in their perspectives regarding the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!