Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
consumption, no matter how perverted the practice might appear to be. Charles<br />
Baudelaire addressed the preface of Les Fleurs du Mal to an hypocrite lecteur, a<br />
hypocritical reader, someone who would not want to accept the self-image the poems<br />
depict. For Ellis, we are all hypocrites, we all indulge in a voyeuristic lifestyle of<br />
consumption, a lifestyle that sees no boundaries in objectifying humanity and turning it<br />
into a product of consumption.<br />
183<br />
Through the blatant yet methodical display of sexual violence, Ellis’ novel was<br />
considered to exceed the boundary of what is acceptable within the norms of society.<br />
Within this simple distinction, American Psycho can be categorized as transgressive; in<br />
this case, the characterization conforms to a standard definition of transgression—one<br />
which implies that of “trespassing”—not the more elaborate conceptualizations from<br />
Chapter Two. In reviewing the novel, James Gardner traces the history of transgressive<br />
literature all the way from Euripides, through Webster, Sade and Celine and defines it in<br />
opposition to what he calls “humanistic” and “nice” literature:<br />
Despite the primacy of this kind of “nice” literature, there is<br />
another kind of literature that increasingly exhibits, and sometimes<br />
even advocates, very different values. Such fiction is often termed<br />
“transgressive” and there are correlative developments in film and<br />
the visual arts. Like the humanistic literature of Amy Tan, it is<br />
seen as being somehow liberal or leftist because it seeks the<br />
distinction of radical “otherness” and because it aspires to threaten<br />
the status quo that writers like Amy Tan and Bharati Mukherjee<br />
seek only to correct. The two strains converge from different<br />
angles of assault on a center allegedly dominated by a white,<br />
Anglo-Saxon, heterosexual, right-handed patriarchy.<br />
By addressing the notion of a “center” being attacked by this transgressive fiction, James<br />
Gardner still relies on the standard definition of transgression—one which is closer to<br />
subversion than to transgression—but fails to provide a theoretical framework necessary