scaricalo in formato PDF - labogen srl
scaricalo in formato PDF - labogen srl
scaricalo in formato PDF - labogen srl
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
IPAF and NAIP5<br />
IPAF (NLRC4, CLAN/CARD12) and NAIP5 constitute another set of NLRs.<br />
IPAF belongs to the CARD subfamily whereas NAIP5 is a member of the<br />
BIR subfamily. Both NLRs have been shown to respond to flagell<strong>in</strong>, the ma<strong>in</strong><br />
component of the bacterial flagellum, restrict<strong>in</strong>g the proliferation of<br />
<strong>in</strong>tracellular bacteria such as Salmonella typhimurium, Shigella flexneri and<br />
Legionella pneumophila. IPAF senses flagell<strong>in</strong> from S. typhimurium and S. flexneri<br />
secreted by the bacterial type III secretion system (TTSS). SipB <strong>in</strong> S.<br />
typhimurium and IpaB <strong>in</strong> S. flexneri are part of a TTSS and are required for<br />
Caspase-1 activation. These prote<strong>in</strong>s participate <strong>in</strong> the translocation of<br />
flagell<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the cytosol by form<strong>in</strong>g a pore <strong>in</strong> the host-cell membrane.<br />
Caspase-1 activation <strong>in</strong>duced by cytosolic flagell<strong>in</strong> has been shown to be<br />
IPAF-dependent, but TLR5-<strong>in</strong>dependent 19 . Thus TLR5 and IPAF appear to<br />
be two different sensors that respond to extracellular and cytosolic flagell<strong>in</strong>,<br />
respectively 20 .The adaptor ASC seems to be <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> Caspase-1 activation<br />
<strong>in</strong> response to <strong>in</strong>fection with S. typhimurium and S. flexneri 21 . Sens<strong>in</strong>g of L.<br />
pneumophila flagell<strong>in</strong> which is secreted by the bacterial type IV secretion<br />
system is mediated by NAIP5. Mutations affect<strong>in</strong>g the NAIP5 locus (also<br />
known as Birc1e) have been implicated <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased susceptibility of A/J<br />
macrophages to <strong>in</strong>fection with L. pneumophila. NAIP5 appears to form an<br />
<strong>in</strong>flammasome complex conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g IPAF (but not ASC) and Caspase-1 22 .<br />
NAIP5-mediated signal<strong>in</strong>g pathway and IPAF-mediated Caspase-1 activation<br />
may act <strong>in</strong> concert to restrict L. pneumophila growth <strong>in</strong> macrophages 23,24 .<br />
1. Chamaillard M. et al., 2003. An essential role for NOD1 <strong>in</strong> host recognition of bacterial<br />
peptidoglycan conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g diam<strong>in</strong>opimelic acid. Nat. Immunol. 4: 702-707. 2. Girard<strong>in</strong> SE. et al.,<br />
2003. Nod1 detects a unique muropeptide from Gram-negative bacterial peptidoglycan. Science<br />
300: 1584-1587. 3. McDonald C., N. Inohara, G. Nunez. 2005. Peptidoglycan signal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>nate<br />
immunity and <strong>in</strong>flammatory disease. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 20177-20180. 4. Kobayash, K. et al., 2002.<br />
RICK/Rip2/CARDIAK mediates signall<strong>in</strong>g for receptors of the <strong>in</strong>nate and adaptive immune<br />
systems. Nature 416: 194-199. 5. Inohara N. et al., 2000. An <strong>in</strong>duced proximity model for NF-<br />
B activation <strong>in</strong> the Nod1/RICK and RIP signal<strong>in</strong>g pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 27823-27831.<br />
6. Kobayashi KS. et al., 2005. Nod2-dependent regulation of <strong>in</strong>nate and adaptive immunity <strong>in</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al tract. Science 307: 731-734. 7. Hsu YM. et al., 2007. The adaptor prote<strong>in</strong> CARD9<br />
is required for <strong>in</strong>nate immune responses to <strong>in</strong>tracellular pathogens. Nat Immunol. 8(2):198-205.<br />
8. Ogura Y. et al., 2001. A frameshift mutation <strong>in</strong> NOD2 associated with susceptibility to Crohn’s<br />
disease. Nature 411: 603-606. 9. Hysi P. et al., 2005. NOD1 variation, immunoglobul<strong>in</strong> E and<br />
asthma. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14: 935-941. 10. Mart<strong>in</strong>on F. & Tschopp J., 2004. Inflammatory<br />
caspases: l<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>tracellular <strong>in</strong>nate immune system to auto<strong>in</strong>flammatory diseases. Cell.<br />
117(5):561-74. 11. Faust<strong>in</strong> B, et al., 2006. In Vitro Reconstitution of the NALP1 Inflammasome<br />
Reveals Requirements for Caspase Activation. Blood (ASH Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g Abstracts), 108:<br />
3658. 12. Boyden ED. & Dietrich WF., 2006. Nalp1b controls mouse macrophage susceptibility<br />
to anthrax lethal tox<strong>in</strong>. Nat Genet. 38(2):240-4. 13. Mart<strong>in</strong>on F. et al., 2006. Gout-associated<br />
uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 <strong>in</strong>flammasome. Nature 440(7081)237-241. 14. Kanneganti<br />
TD. et al., 2006. Bacterial RNA and small antiviral compounds activate caspase-1 through<br />
cryopyr<strong>in</strong>/Nalp3. Nature 440(7081):233-236. 15. Mariathasan S. et al., 2006. Cryopyr<strong>in</strong> activates<br />
the <strong>in</strong>flammasome <strong>in</strong> response to tox<strong>in</strong>s and ATP. Nature. 440(7081):228-32. 16. Sutterwala FS.<br />
et al., 2006. Critical role for NALP3/CIAS1/Cryopyr<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>nate and adaptive immunity through<br />
its regulation of caspase-1. Immunity. 24(3):317-27. 17. Kanneganti TD. et al., 2007. Pannex<strong>in</strong>-1mediated<br />
recognition of bacterial molecules activates the cryopyr<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>flammasome <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
of Toll-like receptor signal<strong>in</strong>g. Immunity. 26(4):433-43. 18. T<strong>in</strong>g JP. et al., 2006. CATERPILLERs,<br />
pyr<strong>in</strong> and hereditary immunological disorders. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6: 183-195. 19. Miao EA. et<br />
al., 2008. Pseudomonas aerug<strong>in</strong>osa activates caspase 1 through Ipaf. PNAS.105:2562-2567. 20.<br />
Yu HB.& F<strong>in</strong>lay BB. 2008. The Caspase-1 <strong>in</strong>flammasome: a pilot of <strong>in</strong>nate immune responses.<br />
Cell Host Microbe. 4:198-207. 21. Mariathasan S & Monack DM., 2007. Inflammasome adaptors<br />
and sensors: <strong>in</strong>tracellular regulators of <strong>in</strong>fection and <strong>in</strong>flammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 7(1):31-<br />
40. 22. Zamboni DS. et al., 2006. The Birc1e cytosolic pattern-recognition receptor contributes<br />
to the detection and control of Legionella pneumophila <strong>in</strong>fection. Nat Immunol. 7(3):318-25.<br />
23. Lamkanfi M. et al., 2007. The Nod-like receptor family member Naip5/Birc1e restricts<br />
Legionella pneumophila growth <strong>in</strong>dependently of caspase-1 axctivation. J Immunol. 178:8022-<br />
8027. 24. V<strong>in</strong>z<strong>in</strong>g M. et al. 2008. NAIP and IPAF control legionella pneumophila replication <strong>in</strong><br />
human cells. J Immunol. 180:6808-15.<br />
www.<strong>in</strong>vivogen.com/<strong>in</strong>nate-immunity 53<br />
INNATE IMMUNITY 3