25.04.2013 Views

mysteries of egyptian zodiacs - HiddenMysteries Information Central

mysteries of egyptian zodiacs - HiddenMysteries Information Central

mysteries of egyptian zodiacs - HiddenMysteries Information Central

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

we found out that the symbolism <strong>of</strong> the Egyptian <strong>zodiacs</strong> was<br />

always strictly connected with a precise description <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

astronomical events. Therefore, we expect that a full solution<br />

should be a key to clarify the hidden astronomical meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the symbolic scenes shown on the zodiac. This is clearly<br />

not the case for this solution.<br />

Let us now consider the solution: January 18–20, 448,<br />

which was obtained for the Lower zodiac. We are interested in<br />

how well this solution matches the information decoded from<br />

the Lower zodiac. This date wasn’t consider in the previous<br />

calculations. That means, some <strong>of</strong> the invisible on this date<br />

planets were not in the same order as the planets shown on<br />

the Lower zodiac. The listed on that date planetary positions<br />

in Table 8.4 indicate that the location <strong>of</strong> Venus on the ecliptic<br />

was on the other side <strong>of</strong> the Sun than it is indicated on<br />

the Lower zodiac. At that time Venus was very close to the<br />

Sun — the longitude distance between them was less than 3 o .<br />

That means, Venus was completely invisible in the rays <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sun. In such a situation, it was impossible for an Earth-based<br />

observer to determine the exact order <strong>of</strong> these two celestial<br />

objects on the ecliptic. Therefore, in this case this is not a<br />

sufficient reason to reject this solution. In fact, the locations<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the other planets are exactly as they are shown on the<br />

Lower zodiac.<br />

As we explained it earlier, there are two possible choices<br />

for the summer solstice date related to the solution <strong>of</strong> January<br />

18–20, 448. The first one, is the summer solstice day in<br />

the year 448 — corresponding to the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

in September or January. The second choice is the summer<br />

solstice day in the year 447 — corresponding to the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the year in March or June. Let us point out that all<br />

the previously analyzed by us Egyptian <strong>zodiacs</strong> turned out<br />

to be based on the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year in September, i.e.<br />

around the autumn equinox day. Nevertheless, we should not<br />

exclude a possibility that there are some <strong>zodiacs</strong> using a different<br />

convention for the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year, for example,<br />

the spring equinox day in March or the summer solstice day in<br />

June. Consequently, we will continue to verify all the possible<br />

variants in this respect.<br />

The calculations done by the program Turbo-Sky, indicate<br />

that in June <strong>of</strong> 447 as well as in June <strong>of</strong> 448, on the day<br />

<strong>of</strong> the summer solstice, all five planets gathered around the<br />

Sun in Gemini. This planetary configuration was very similar<br />

to the partial horoscope <strong>of</strong> the summer solstice shown<br />

on the Lower zodiac. In the year 448 this agreement was not<br />

complete. However, in the year 447, the planetary positions<br />

on the summer solstice day perfectly fit the picture on the<br />

Lower zodiac.<br />

Let us discuss these two cases in a more detailed manner.<br />

On the summer solstice day in the year 448, which occured on<br />

June 19, the planets were located in the following positions:<br />

Saturn and Venus — in Leo; Jupiter, the Sun and Mercury —<br />

in Gemini; Mars — in Taurus. These positions indicate that<br />

Venus at that time could only be visible in the evening, so it<br />

was located “under the Sun’s feet.” Nonetheless, in the partial<br />

8.1 The Athribis Zodiacs <strong>of</strong> Flinders Petrie 221<br />

horoscope on the Lower Athribis zodiac, Venus is shown above<br />

“the Sun’s head” in a company <strong>of</strong> another planet. It is clear<br />

that basically we do have an agreement between the solution<br />

and the zodiac, but still it is not perfect.<br />

On June 19, 447, just a day earlier before the summer<br />

solstice day, the planetary configuration fits perfectly well the<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> the partial horoscope <strong>of</strong> the summer solstice on<br />

the Lower zodiac. On that day the order <strong>of</strong> the planets was<br />

as follows (calculations were done using the program Turbo-<br />

Sky): Mars, Saturn, Mercury appeared in the evening in Leo<br />

and Cancer, i.e. they were “under the Sun’s feet”; the Sun<br />

was in Gemini; Jupiter and Venus were in Taurus — visible<br />

in the morning, i.e. “over the Sun’s head.” These planetary<br />

locations match exactly the partial horoscope <strong>of</strong> the summer<br />

solstice on the Lower zodiac.<br />

Let us summarize our analysis <strong>of</strong> this pair <strong>of</strong> the solutions<br />

for the Athribis <strong>zodiacs</strong>: May 13, 408, — for the Upper zodiac,<br />

and January 18–20, 448, — for the Lower zodiac. Among these<br />

two dates, only the second one completely satisfies all the requirements<br />

expected from a full solution. For the first date,<br />

the position <strong>of</strong> Saturn does not agree with the situation<br />

shown on the Upper zodiac. In addition, it contradicts the<br />

“meeting scene in Leo” on the Upper zodiac. Consequently,<br />

this pair <strong>of</strong> solutions (the year 408 and the year 448), is not<br />

full. In the case there is no better pair <strong>of</strong> solutions, this two<br />

dates could be called conditional solutions for the Athribis<br />

<strong>zodiacs</strong>. However, as we are going to see it in the next subsection,<br />

a unique pair <strong>of</strong> full solutions indeed exists.<br />

8.1.5 Final Solutions for the Athribis Zodiacs:<br />

the Lower Zodiac — May 15-16,<br />

1230 AD, the Upper Zodiac — February<br />

9-10, 1268 AD.<br />

It turned out that the second pair <strong>of</strong> solutions (see subsection<br />

8.1.4 is complete. It fully satisfies all the requirement related<br />

to the order <strong>of</strong> the visible planets and it also fulfills all the additional<br />

information decoded from the Athribis <strong>zodiacs</strong>. This<br />

pair <strong>of</strong> solution was:<br />

May 15–16, 1230 AD. — for the Upper zodiac, with the mean<br />

discrepancy from the best points was only 7 o , and<br />

February, 1268 AD. – for the Lower zodiac, with the mean<br />

discrepancy from the best points only 6 o . Let us point out<br />

that such small mean discrepancy values occurs very rarely.<br />

They can be viewed as an indication that apparently there<br />

is an extremely good match between the solutions and the<br />

<strong>zodiacs</strong>.<br />

In Table 8.5 we list the exact planetary locations on the<br />

ecliptic J2000 for these two solutions. For each <strong>of</strong> these dates,<br />

we indicate in degrees the positions <strong>of</strong> the planets on the<br />

ecliptic J2000. In the next row below, we show the same locations<br />

using their coordinates on the constellation scale (see<br />

section 6.10). Finally, for each <strong>of</strong> the listed planets we specify<br />

its corresponding zodiacal constellation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!