mysteries of egyptian zodiacs - HiddenMysteries Information Central

28 1 The Problems of Historical Chronology
AD) and another one of the Jewish kings according the Bible
(9th – 5th BC). On Figure 1.25 we show the vertical time line
with two graphs of reign durations on its opposite sides for
comparison. On this chart, we start the dates for the dynasty
of Jewish kings in the year zero, which is not a date according
to some era but simply indicates the starting “zero” point
for this dynasty. According to Scaliger’s chronology the beginning
of this dynasty is around 922 B.C. Figure 1.25 was
taken from the monograph [103] by A.T. Fomenko.
There are many more examples of similar dynasty pairs
in the conventional chronology. For instance, the parallel between
the first period of the Roman episcopate in 141-314
A.D. and the second period of the Roman episcopate in 314-
532 A.D. is shown in Figure 1.27. On Figure 1.26, we present
another pair of graphs, this time without annotations. All
the graphs were also taken from the monograph [103]. The
parallel between the Roman coronations of the Holy Roman
emperors and the biblical Israeli rulers shown in Figure 1.26.
Another historical duplicate, or parallel is illustrated on
Figure 1.27, where we show a repetition in the chronology
line of the Roman Episcopate. In the example on Figure 1.29,
we show strong similarities between the Holy Roman Empire
of the 10th–13th centuries A.D. and the Roman Empire in
the 4th–6th centuries A.D. Then, on Figure 1.30 we show
the repetition of the dynasty functions for the Second Roman
Empire in the 1st century B.C. – 3rd century A.D. and the
Third Roman Empire in the 3rd–6th centuries A.D.
In Figure 1.31 we show a parallel between the Roman Empire
in the 10th–13th century A.D. and the Hapsburg’s Empire
in the 13th–17th century A.D. Next, on Figure 1.32 there
is another parallel between the Caroligians in the 7th–9th
centuries A.D. and the Third Roman Empire in the 3rd–6th
century A.D. Finally, on Figure 1.33 we illustrate the repetitions
between the Eastern Roman Empire in 3006–700 A.D.
and the Biblical Kingdom of Judah in the 10th–6th centuries
B.C.
Another type of graphs was used in Figure 1.34 to show
the parallel between the Holy Roman Empire in the 10th–13th
centuries A.D. and the Third Roman Empire in the 4th–6th
centuries A.D., and in Figure 1.35 between the Holy Roman
Empire in the 10th–13th centuries A.D. and the Hapsburg’s
Empire in the 13th-15th century A.D.
These parallels suggest that the traditional history of ancient
times consist of multiple recounts of the same events
scattered in many locations at various times. The first scientist
who realized it was N.A. Morozov (see [4]). A.T. Fomenko
found several new parallels, some of them between more than
two dynasties, and was able to decipher the principle structure
of these duplicates in European and Biblical history (see
[103]). He discover that the existence of duplicates of dynasty
functions resulted from three main historical shifts, which can
be seen as historical repetitions. On Figure 1.36, we show
a graphical representation of the duplicates and the main
historical shifts (discovered by A.T. Fomenko) that are re-
lated to the Roman and European history. On the graph the
chronological blocks annotated by the same letters (what we
also emphasized by adding colors) represent duplicates in the
conventional chronology. The main shifts are denoted by the
symbols S3, S2 and S1..
The work of Fomenko and his collaborators proves that
the statistical analysis can be successfully applied to analyze
the numerical data contained in historical documents. A.T.
Fomenko and G.V. Nosovsky also developed several other
statistical criteria for distinguishing or recognizing identical
sequences of historical events. We should mention for example
the method of detecting chronological shifts based on the
names distribution in chronicles and the method of relation
matrices used to recognize duplicates and decompose chronicles
into its source fragments (see [103]).