06.05.2013 Views

Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual.pdf

Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual.pdf

Erosion and Sediment Pollution Control Program Manual.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPDES Permits Involving Site Remediation <strong>and</strong> Redevelopment.<br />

Source Unknown<br />

In general, the risk of discharge will be directly related to the<br />

level of contamination at the site. General permits are<br />

ineligible for sites having the potential to discharge<br />

contaminants. In most cases, individual NPDES permits will<br />

be required to facilitate coordinated reviews with pertinent<br />

Department staff <strong>and</strong> to apply the additional level of review<br />

that may be necessary. Sites that have already been<br />

remediated to the Residential Statewide Health St<strong>and</strong>ard for<br />

soils <strong>and</strong> groundwater are not considered to be<br />

contaminated <strong>and</strong> a general permit (PAG-02) can be<br />

authorized for earth disturbance activities on such sites.<br />

Persons applying for an NPDES Permit for stormwater discharges associated with construction<br />

activities are required to employ environmental due diligence to determine if past <strong>and</strong> present l<strong>and</strong> use<br />

may have resulted in the possibility of contamination on site. Examples of environmental due diligence,<br />

include but are not limited to:<br />

Determining previous uses of the l<strong>and</strong>, or of any neighboring l<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Determining if the site has the potential to be contaminated based on past activities.<br />

Checking with local government entities for any information that may be available about the<br />

area.<br />

Contacting agencies that may have dealings with contaminated sites <strong>and</strong> gathering any<br />

available information for the site in question.<br />

Performing a site inspection/investigation by an experienced practitioner since the level of risk<br />

can only be assessed on a site-by-site basis. Note, this may be the same as performing a site<br />

characterization.<br />

If there is a possibility of soil <strong>and</strong>/or groundwater contamination, the applicant is required to have<br />

testing performed <strong>and</strong> to provide the sampling <strong>and</strong> test results in the appropriate section of the NPDES<br />

permit. The applicant should not refer to a lengthy site characterization/remediation plan that was<br />

submitted to a separate Department program, but rather submit a summary of all the pollutants of<br />

concern on a table <strong>and</strong> provide brief supporting documentation as necessary. In particular, information<br />

should be submitted regarding the potential of contaminant mobility due to proposed construction<br />

activities.<br />

Based on the aforementioned, the following minimum information is required for projects involving<br />

potential pollutants on-site, including the L<strong>and</strong> Recycling <strong>Program</strong> under Act 2 of 1995, Superfund<br />

program or any other project involving site remediation <strong>and</strong>/or redevelopment.<br />

1. Site Plan:<br />

a. The existing site plan should clearly show all areas that have been tested <strong>and</strong> which of<br />

those areas have been identified as “contaminated,” or are considered “hot spots.” For<br />

Act 2 sites, this would include all areas that do not meet the statewide residential health<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard. More discussion on dealing with hot spot areas can be found in Appendix C of<br />

the Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices <strong>Manual</strong>.<br />

b. For those projects involving redevelopment, the proposed site plan <strong>and</strong> narrative should<br />

clearly show any remaining contaminated areas, including areas that were capped, that<br />

may be exposed as a result of the proposed work <strong>and</strong> explain how any conflicts have<br />

been resolved, including:<br />

i. The placement of utilities, foundations or other subsurface systems that may<br />

compromise the clean-up remedy.<br />

363-2134-008 / March 31, 2012 / Page 340

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!