Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
13.47<br />
13.48<br />
BME women would be left <strong>in</strong> a desperate situation with nowhere to go for culturally appropriate<br />
advice and support. (See Appendix: 4 and 5)<br />
Recommendations:<br />
• Carry out a full <strong>equality</strong> impact assessment of <strong>the</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> welfare system<br />
and how <strong>the</strong>y are affect<strong>in</strong>g BME women subjected to multiple discrim<strong>in</strong>ation and<br />
put corrective actions <strong>in</strong> place to mitigate negative effects<br />
• The Government and particularly Local Authorities should ensure that fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
specialist BME women’s organisations is provided and <strong>in</strong>creased and that <strong>the</strong>y can<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ue provid<strong>in</strong>g valuable services to BME women<br />
Disabled women<br />
From April 2011 people claim<strong>in</strong>g Incapacity Benefit (IB) have been moved onto ESA. There is<br />
also a 20% cut to <strong>the</strong> DLA 112 and <strong>the</strong> Government’s Welfare Reform Bill has abolished DLA for<br />
work<strong>in</strong>g age adults (16-64 years of age) who will need to be reassessed for <strong>the</strong> new benefit, <strong>the</strong><br />
Personal Independence Payment (PIP).<br />
Although not all <strong>the</strong> changes to disability benefits will disproportionately affect women, <strong>the</strong>y<br />
will have a serious impact on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>comes of disabled women and women carers. The changes<br />
to disability benefits may lead to a significant drop <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come for some groups of women,<br />
particularly those who were receiv<strong>in</strong>g IB but are assessed as not be<strong>in</strong>g entitled to ESA. This may<br />
leave <strong>the</strong>se women <strong>in</strong> poverty with implications for <strong>the</strong>ir human rights. Additionally, <strong>the</strong> new PIP<br />
consultation does not take <strong>in</strong>to account extra costs related to be<strong>in</strong>g female e.g. higher costs<br />
for ‘personal care’ issues. In addition to <strong>the</strong> stress caused by <strong>the</strong> assessment for ESA, disabled<br />
people will also lose out from <strong>the</strong> move to limit contributory ESA to one year for people who<br />
are <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Work Related Activity Group (WRAG). This means that people with assets, sav<strong>in</strong>gs or<br />
a work<strong>in</strong>g partner will no longer receive benefits. This will particularly affect disabled women,<br />
women who are carers and <strong>the</strong> partners of disabled people. 113 (See Appendix: 36 for fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation)<br />
Case study: 114<br />
“Ela<strong>in</strong>e Christian, 57, of Hull, was worried, accord<strong>in</strong>g to reports of an <strong>in</strong>quest <strong>in</strong> July, about<br />
a meet<strong>in</strong>g to assess her disability benefits. She was found drowned <strong>in</strong> a dra<strong>in</strong> with evidence<br />
of <strong>in</strong>gested pa<strong>in</strong>killers and ten self-<strong>in</strong>flicted cuts to her wrist. Although she left a suicide<br />
note, an open verdict was recorded. Her husband told <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>quest: ‘She [Ela<strong>in</strong>e] was<br />
worried about <strong>the</strong> assessment, but was never one to compla<strong>in</strong>’.”<br />
112. Marsh, S. (2011) ‘Welfare Reform Bill: Key issues for disabled and sick people’, Ekklesia website, http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/16050<br />
Accessed: 15/04/13<br />
113. <strong>Women’s</strong> Budget Group (2010) The Impact on Women of <strong>the</strong> Coalition Spend<strong>in</strong>g Review 2010. WBG: London http://wbg.org.uk/RRB_<br />
Reports_4_1653541019.pdf<br />
114. Butler, P. (2011) ‘Do Cuts Kill?’, The Guardian, 16th November 2011 http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/patrick-butler-cuts-blog/2011/<br />
nov/16/do-public-spend<strong>in</strong>g-cuts-kill<br />
<strong>Women’s</strong> <strong>equality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>: CEDAW shadow report 2013 143