Women’s equality in the UK – A health check

Recommendations

Info

10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 Article 10: Education and skills Throughout this report ‘young women’ refers to over 18s but under Article 10 there is information on girls in school and education policies for under 18s as this has been included by the Government and has impacts on women’s later life. However, cuts to education services also impact disproportionately on women as carers (See Article 13 and Appendix: 18 for further information) and depriving people of education is a way of marginalising minorities. For example, the loss of the Educational Maintenance Allowance (EMA) and student grants will further disadvantage already marginalised women. More than half of schools in England are facing cuts to their budgets 1 with 60% of primary students and 87% of secondary students facing a real-terms cut in funding. 2 The cuts to education budgets have led to cuts in services in schools for children with special needs or mental health problems. 3 These cuts have an impact on the women who are the mothers of these children, since mothers are more likely to be the primary carers and therefore be the parents responsible for trying to get additional help, taking children to appointments, appealing against decisions and so on. Women make up 73% of applications for legal aid in education-related cases. 4 It is a commonly held belief that girls now outperform boys in education, and that it is boys’ underachievement and overrepresentation amongst official school exclusion statistics that should be the top educational priority. This picture does not reflect the reality of many girls’ and young women’s lives, however, many of whom do not achieve in school, are steered into genderstereotyped careers with few prospects, disengage at a young age, or are allowed to drift out of education without appropriate support or alternative provision. 5 The White Paper The Government’s 7th Periodic Report 6 references the fact that it has published ‘a radical reform programme’ for teachers and schools in its 2010 White Paper, The Importance of Teaching. 7 The Government claims that this draws on evidence from the world’s best education systems, aiming to enable teachers to drive school improvement. In fact, the White Paper was entirely silent about gender and education. It contained no analysis about the role of education in challenging gender stereotypes and offered no solutions to discrimination against women in UK society. Beyond the omission of gender and education, the contents of the White Paper have required schools and teachers to focus on attainment and results to a degree which militates against time and space for a focus on other outcomes. 1. Richardson, H. (2011) ‘Half of schools see budget cuts, survey suggests’, BBC News Education and Family, 10th May 2011, http://www.bbc. co.uk/news/education-13346238 2. National Union of Teachers (2011) What Teachers Need to Know about the Cuts. NUT: London http://www.teachers.org.uk/files/the-cuts- 12pp-a5-7320.pdf 3. BBC News (2011) ‘Special needs support promises more parent power’, BBC News Education and Family, 10th March 2011 http://www.bbc. co.uk/news/education-12677259 4. Stephenson, M. (2011) TUC Women and the Cuts Toolkit: How to carry out a human rights and equality impact assessment of the spending cuts on women. TUC: London http://www.tuc.org.uk/equality/tuc-20286-f0.cfm 5. For more on this please see the introductory chapter in Jackson, C. et al (2010) Girls and Education: Continuing concerns, new agendas. Open University Press: Maidenhead 6. Government Equalities Office (2011) CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women) report. United Kingdom’s Seventh Periodic Report. GEO: London http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/international-equality/7thcedaw-report?view=Binary 7. Department for Education (2012) The Importance of Teaching: Schools White Paper http://www.education.gov.uk/schools/ toolsandinitiatives/schoolswhitepaper/b0068570/the-importance-of-teaching 84 Women’s equality in the UK: CEDAW shadow report 2013
10.5 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 The Education Act 2011 In the 7th Periodic Report, it is acknowledged that the latest Education Act 8 did not specifically legislate to implement gender equality policies. The Government fails to recognise that education can provide a crucial means of preventing the attitudes and behaviour that leads to discrimination against women in society. The Government has, so far, failed to pay due regard to the impact of its education reforms on women and girls. The 2011 Girls’ Attitudes Survey by the Girl Guides found that “recent changes in education funding have had a major impact on girls’ attitudes to Higher Education and careers. Concern about the cost of college or university, and being able to find a job, is placing increasing pressure on them at secondary school.” 9 Careers advice and gender stereotypes One of the key recommendations from the Women and Work Commission set up in 2004 to look at the wide-ranging influences on the gender pay gap, was that the Department for Education (DfE) and relevant Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland departments should draw up national guidance for teachers and Early Years childcare workers on how to ensure that the horizons of children in the three to five age group are not limited by stereotypes of what boys and girls can do. (See Appendix: 25) There has been no progress made on this recommendation since the Women and Work Commission reported in 2006. 10 The Commission further recommended that the DfE and relevant Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland departments should ensure that teacher training emphasises the need to challenge gender stereotypes, both in delivery of careers education and in subject teaching, and that it allows for a work placement for all trainee teachers including observing workers in non-traditional occupations. Similarly, there has been no progress in relation to this recommendation. As stated in the Government’s report, 11 the Education Act places schools under a duty to secure access to independent careers guidance. 12 However neither the report nor the Act refers specifically to ensuring that gender stereotypes are actively challenged by this independent service. A narrow range of gender-stereotypical work placements tends to dominate young women’s choices, and many have limited knowledge of how choices about courses and careers influence pay and progression routes. 13 (See Article 11) It is essential that pupils are given full information about how the courses and careers they choose are likely to impact on their longterm earnings, and to do this, careers advisors must receive training on challenging gender stereotypes. (See Article 5 for more information) 8. Education Act 2011 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/21/contents/enacted 9. Girlguiding (2011) ‘Press release: Third Girl’s Attitudes Survey highlights UK Girl’s Views’, 25th October 2011 http://www.girlguiding.org.uk/ system_pages/small_navigation/press_office/latest_press_releases/third_girls_attitudes_survey.aspx 10. Women and Work Commission (2006) Shaping a Fairer Future http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/27_02_06_wwc_paygap.pdf 11. Government Equalities Office (2011) CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women) report. United Kingdom’s Seventh Periodic Report. GEO: London http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/international-equality/7thcedaw-report?view=Binary Paragraph 134 12. Government Equalities Office (2011) CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination against Women) report. United Kingdom’s Seventh Periodic Report. GEO: London http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/international-equality/7thcedaw-report?view=Binary Paragraph 134 13. Ofsted (2011) Girls’ career aspirations http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/girls-career-aspirations; and Equality and Human Rights Commission (2011) The Equality Duties and Schools: Lessons for the future, Equality and Human Rights Commission Policy paper for England, June 2011. http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/uploaded_files/EqualityAct/PSED/equality_duties_and_schools_policy_paper. pdf Women’s equality in the UK: CEDAW shadow report 2013 85
Page 1 and 2:
Women’s equality in the UK - A he
Page 3 and 4:
Women’s equality in the UK - A he
Page 5 and 6:
Appendices (online only) Appendix 1
Page 7 and 8:
• the continued discrimination ag
Page 9 and 10:
• Develop a common model of analy
Page 11 and 12:
Article 9 - Nationality: One third
Page 13 and 14:
investment in social infrastructure
Page 15 and 16:
and increase the marginalisation of
Page 17 and 18:
have been no prosecutions in Englan
Page 19 and 20:
1 2 3 4 5 Introduction This is a Un
Page 21 and 22:
10 11 12 13 housing crisis, a ‘lo
Page 23 and 24:
1.1 1.2 1.3 Article 1 - Overarching
Page 25 and 26:
1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 Women’
Page 27 and 28:
1.17 1.18 1.19 Young women We are a
Page 29 and 30:
2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 consult to “remov
Page 31 and 32:
2.12 2.13 discrimination”. Howeve
Page 33 and 34: 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 worsen gen
Page 35 and 36: 2.26 2.27 2.28 2.29 CEDAW and the l
Page 37 and 38: 3.7 3.8 3.9 3.10 would “increase
Page 39 and 40: 3.15 3.16 3.17 and accountable EHRC
Page 41 and 42: 3.22 3.23 3.24 report is was partic
Page 43 and 44: classes, migrants, and Gypsy, Trave
Page 45 and 46: the institutional discrimination an
Page 47 and 48: 5.5 5.6 5.7 Case study: 8 Sandra li
Page 49 and 50: 5.12 5.13 5.14 issue. A more approp
Page 51 and 52: 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Article 6 - Exploit
Page 53 and 54: 6.9 6.10 6.11 to the protection and
Page 55 and 56: 6.15 6.16 6.17 6.18 Office’s own
Page 57 and 58: 6.24 6.25 6.26 women and increase t
Page 59 and 60: 6.31 6.32 6.33 6.34 infrequent lap
Page 61 and 62: 7.1 7.2 Article 7 - Political and p
Page 63 and 64: 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.10 The House of Lords
Page 65 and 66: 7.13 7.14 7.15 7.16 7.17 Recommenda
Page 67 and 68: 7.21 7.22 7.23 Political representa
Page 69 and 70: 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 Article
Page 71 and 72: 9.9 9.10 Mainstreaming gender in th
Page 73 and 74: 9.15 9.16 9.17 biased views towards
Page 75 and 76: 9.21 9.22 9.23 9.24 women. 47 (See
Page 77 and 78: 9.28 9.29 9.30 9.31 New family migr
Page 79 and 80: 9.35 9.36 UKBA, where men and women
Page 81 and 82: 9.39 9.40 9.41 9.42 • Do not redu
Page 83: 9.46 Research on immigration case m
Page 87 and 88: 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 boys and on
Page 89 and 90: 10.22 10.23 allow speakers to promo
Page 91 and 92: 10.29 10.30 10.31 10.32 Case study:
Page 93 and 94: 10.37 10.38 10.39 10.40 • Many wo
Page 95 and 96: 10.46 10.47 10.48 applications (fig
Page 97 and 98: 11.1 11.2 11.3 11.4 Article 11 - Em
Page 99 and 100: 11.8 11.9 are 754,000 women working
Page 101 and 102: 11.14 11.15 11.16 11.17 11.18 The g
Page 103 and 104: 11.24 11.25 11.26 per week or they
Page 105 and 106: 11.31 11.32 11.33 Introducing more
Page 107 and 108: 11.37 11.38 Case study: 83 Jasmine
Page 109 and 110: 11.42 11.43 11.44 11.45 At the 2012
Page 111 and 112: 12.3 12.4 12.5 12.6 of women and en
Page 113 and 114: 12.12 12.13 12.14 12.15 Translators
Page 115 and 116: 12.19 12.20 12.21 12.22 Barriers to
Page 117 and 118: 12.25 12.26 12.27 12.28 Gypsy and T
Page 119 and 120: 12.34 12.35 12.36 12.37 Older women
Page 121 and 122: 12.41 12.42 Recommendations: • Th
Page 123 and 124: 12.47 12.48 12.49 12.50 they are at
Page 125 and 126: 12.55 12.56 12.57 Case studies: 128
Page 127 and 128: 12.60 12.61 12.62 12.63 12.64 hospi
Page 129 and 130: 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 13.5 Article 13
Page 131 and 132: 13.11 13.12 13.13 13.14 children ne
Page 133 and 134: 13.17 13.18 13.19 13.20 Welfare ref
Page 135 and 136:
13.25 13.26 13.27 13.28 because in
Page 137 and 138:
13.32 13.33 Case study: 57 “As a
Page 139 and 140:
13.36 13.37 allocation of resources
Page 141 and 142:
13.41 13.42 Homelessness, including
Page 143 and 144:
13.47 13.48 BME women would be left
Page 145 and 146:
13.52 13.53 13.54 13.55 with some l
Page 147 and 148:
13.60 13.61 13.62 effect to their p
Page 149 and 150:
14.6 14.7 14.8 disabled and lesbian
Page 151 and 152:
14.14 Gypsy and Traveller women suf
Page 153 and 154:
15.6 15.7 15.8 15.9 15.10 15.11 The
Page 155 and 156:
15.14 15.15 15.16 purport to be vic
Page 157 and 158:
15.21 15.22 15.23 Case study: 35
Page 159 and 160:
15.28 15.29 15.30 15.31 has not pro
Page 161 and 162:
15.35 15.36 behaviour by male priso
Page 163 and 164:
16.5 16.6 people being forced into
Page 165 and 166:
16.10 16.11 16.12 16.13 16.14 16.15
Page 167 and 168:
16.21 16.22 frequently women’s ac
Page 169 and 170:
Recommendations: • Parents with c
Page 171 and 172:
19.6 19.7 19.8 as well as for our c
Page 173 and 174:
19.13 19.14 19.15 19.16 The Governm
Page 175 and 176:
19.22 19.23 19.24 19.25 VAWG is a c
Page 177 and 178:
19.30 19.31 19.32 19.33 DV is still
Page 179 and 180:
19.38 19.39 19.40 perpetrators thro
Page 181 and 182:
19.43 19.44 19.45 Support for victi
Page 183 and 184:
19.49 19.50 19.51 19.52 Recommendat
Page 185 and 186:
19.57 19.58 19.59 19.60 BMER VAWG p
Page 187 and 188:
19.62 19.63 19.64 19.65 VAWG in hea
Page 189 and 190:
19.70 19.71 19.72 Invisibility of s
Page 191 and 192:
19.77 19.78 19.79 A number of repor
Page 193 and 194:
19.85 19.86 means more provision. T
Page 195 and 196:
Annex 1: The Devolved Administratio
Page 197 and 198:
to 41.8% of rural men. 16 Rural are
Page 199 and 200:
Annex 2: The UK’s relationship wi
Page 201 and 202:
Annex 3: UK reservations and declar
Page 203 and 204:
ESA - Employment and Support Allowa
Page 205 and 206:
Annex 5: Acknowledgements Many than
Page 207:
Women’s Resource Centre is suppor
show all

Women’s equality in the UK – A health check

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?