Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9.28<br />
9.29<br />
9.30<br />
9.31<br />
New family migration Immigration Rules<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r changes <strong>in</strong> rules and policy will have a negative impact on women with ‘no recourse<br />
to public funds’ and underm<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong> DDV Concession even for those who<br />
qualify for it. New Rules from July 2012 have <strong>in</strong>troduced new family migration requirements<br />
which, especially <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>in</strong>come, will generally be far harder for women to meet than<br />
men consider<strong>in</strong>g women’s reduced <strong>in</strong>comes and <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong>isation of poverty. The new Rules<br />
disproportionately affect British women, whose wages are on average lower than men’s, mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>the</strong>m less able to marry someone from outside <strong>the</strong> EU. In addition 63 foreign-based spousal<br />
<strong>in</strong>come isn’t counted.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ‘probationary period’ before which partners on partner visas must wait<br />
before apply<strong>in</strong>g for ILR has been <strong>in</strong>creased from two years to five years, (See Appendix: 8)<br />
materially <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> time dur<strong>in</strong>g which many women will be prey to partners who use <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
<strong>in</strong>secure immigration status as a weapon of control. From April 2013 legal aid will be withdrawn<br />
for immigration cases 64 mak<strong>in</strong>g it harder for <strong>the</strong>se women to obta<strong>in</strong> advice. 65 (See Appendix: 28)<br />
Recommendations:<br />
• Reform <strong>the</strong> Domestic Violence Rule so that all types of evidence of domestic<br />
violence are accepted, all women subject to immigration control are eligible, and<br />
provide adequate levels of legal aid so that <strong>the</strong>re is access to good quality legal<br />
advice and assistance<br />
• Properly assess and review <strong>the</strong> implications of <strong>the</strong> new family migration<br />
Immigration Rules to ensure <strong>the</strong>y do not disproportionately affect women<br />
Support and accommodation<br />
In March 2011 <strong>the</strong> Home Office cut fund<strong>in</strong>g for advice for newly arrived asylum seekers by more<br />
than 60%. This advice covers apply<strong>in</strong>g for asylum, access<strong>in</strong>g support and hous<strong>in</strong>g and also helps<br />
those suffer<strong>in</strong>g from harassment or DV. 66 There is also limited State support for safe hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and many groups of migrant women do not qualify for hous<strong>in</strong>g support or funded shelter places.<br />
(See Appendix: 8)<br />
Asylum seek<strong>in</strong>g women, women with ‘no recourse to public funds’ and o<strong>the</strong>r vulnerable<br />
groups of migrants such as undocumented migrant women, face serious barriers to access<strong>in</strong>g<br />
adequate hous<strong>in</strong>g. Those who do not qualify for <strong>UK</strong>BA accommodation are often dependent<br />
on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal hous<strong>in</strong>g market; <strong>the</strong>y occupy poor quality and overcrowded hous<strong>in</strong>g, and are<br />
often charged disproportionate rents. Emergency hous<strong>in</strong>g projects are only short-term and<br />
it is extremely difficult for those unable to apply for <strong>the</strong> DDV Concession to access women’s<br />
shelters as <strong>the</strong> State refuses to reimburse <strong>the</strong> organisations that provide this support. Only<br />
8.5% of women with ‘no recourse to public funds’ who request a refuge place <strong>in</strong> London obta<strong>in</strong><br />
63. Magnanti, B. (2012) ‘Brita<strong>in</strong>s migration rules are tear<strong>in</strong>g families apart’, The Telegraph, 20th November 2012 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/<br />
women/mo<strong>the</strong>r-tongue/9688898/Brita<strong>in</strong>s-migration-rules-are-tear<strong>in</strong>g-families-apart.html#<br />
64. Hynes, S. (2012) ‘Legal aid for domestic violence victims should not be decided on luck’, The Guardian, 27th April 2012 http://www.guardian.<br />
co.uk/law/2012/apr/27/legal-aid-lords-domestic-violence-luck<br />
65. This is because, even though legal aid is be<strong>in</strong>g formally reta<strong>in</strong>ed for domestic violence cases, <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> legal aid scheme operates is likely<br />
to make it f<strong>in</strong>ancially unviable for more than a few providers to offer this service. (At <strong>the</strong> time of writ<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> tender<strong>in</strong>g process has just<br />
commenced, and it is too soon to say whe<strong>the</strong>r or to what extent this is happen<strong>in</strong>g).<br />
66. Stephenson, M. (2011) TUC Women and <strong>the</strong> Cuts Toolkit: How to carry out a human rights and <strong>equality</strong> impact assessment of <strong>the</strong> spend<strong>in</strong>g<br />
cuts on women. TUC: London http://www.tuc.org.uk/<strong>equality</strong>/tuc-20286-f0.cfm<br />
67. Fellas, O. (2008) Victims of Domestic violence with no recourse to public funds. No Recourse to Public Funds Network and Isl<strong>in</strong>gton<br />
Council https://www.isl<strong>in</strong>gton.gov.uk/publicrecords/documents/HealthandSocialCare/Pdf/nrpf_victims_dv_nrpf.pdf<br />
<strong>Women’s</strong> <strong>equality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>: CEDAW shadow report 2013 77