Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Women’s equality in the UK – A health check
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.9<br />
6.10<br />
6.11<br />
to <strong>the</strong> protection and enforcement of victims’ rights. 20 That a significant proportion of victims<br />
fail to be identified, are held <strong>in</strong> immigration detention, or are crim<strong>in</strong>alized and held <strong>in</strong> prison, is<br />
quite contrary to <strong>the</strong> spirit and <strong>in</strong>tention of <strong>the</strong> Convention. 21<br />
Much of <strong>the</strong> positive potential and effect of <strong>the</strong> Convention is dim<strong>in</strong>ished by <strong>the</strong> weaknesses<br />
of <strong>the</strong> NRM and <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>re is no appeals process. The only option for victims of<br />
traffick<strong>in</strong>g is to pursue a complex and costly judicial review of <strong>the</strong>ir negative grounds decision<br />
or seek asylum. Moreover, it would appear that a vast majority of <strong>the</strong>se negative decisions<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Competent Authority, when reconsidered, are changed to positive outcomes prior to<br />
<strong>the</strong> commencement of judicial review hear<strong>in</strong>gs, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial decisions were of<br />
poor quality. 22 In relation to <strong>the</strong> quality of decision mak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>BA has developed specific<br />
guidance on gender and traffick<strong>in</strong>g to assist decision makers. However, research 23 on <strong>the</strong> quality<br />
of decision mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> trafficked women’s asylum claims found that despite <strong>the</strong>se policies and<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r improvements made <strong>in</strong> relation to <strong>the</strong> asylum determ<strong>in</strong>ation process, no improvements<br />
<strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g were identified and women were rout<strong>in</strong>ely refused protection by <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>BA<br />
only to be recognised as need<strong>in</strong>g it on appeal. (See Article 9 for more <strong>in</strong>formation) A fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> Anti Traffick<strong>in</strong>g Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Group report, 24 which has cont<strong>in</strong>ued to be borne out<br />
over subsequent years, was that <strong>the</strong>re appeared to be a disproportionate number of conclusive<br />
grounds decisions for victims of European orig<strong>in</strong>. This disproportionality is exacerbated when <strong>in</strong><br />
fact <strong>the</strong> highest proportion of actual cases are from countries such as Nigeria and Vietnam.<br />
Access<strong>in</strong>g protection and justice as envisaged by <strong>the</strong> CoE Convention was already difficult,<br />
stressful and time-consum<strong>in</strong>g, but cuts to legal aid (See Appendix: 28 for fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>formation) are<br />
on such a scale that it is no longer viable for most lawyers to offer legal aid at all. Those few that<br />
still do offer legal aid are heavily over-burdened, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> victims receiv<strong>in</strong>g a reduced service<br />
and delays that such a time sensitive process cannot afford. Although compensation is available<br />
to trafficked women under <strong>the</strong> Crim<strong>in</strong>al Injuries Compensation (CIC) Scheme, very few trafficked<br />
women have been able to apply for or receive compensation because legal aid is not available,<br />
even <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se complex cases. Moreover <strong>the</strong>re is an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g tendency to deter CIC cases by<br />
award<strong>in</strong>g costs aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> claimant if <strong>the</strong>y fail to w<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir claim for compensation. Prostituted<br />
women who are victims of crime can also apply under <strong>the</strong> Scheme; however, <strong>the</strong>ir compensation<br />
will be reduced because of <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> prostitution. Lack of knowledge about <strong>the</strong>se<br />
remedies and limited access to legal aid result <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>m be<strong>in</strong>g significantly under used. 25<br />
The Government’s report expla<strong>in</strong>s that <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g Centre has become part of<br />
<strong>the</strong> Serious Crime Agency. 26 While traffick<strong>in</strong>g must be taken seriously, as <strong>in</strong>dicated above this<br />
approach to address it all as ‘organised crime’ does not represent <strong>the</strong> range of traffick<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
traffickers’ methods. Merg<strong>in</strong>g specialist traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions with o<strong>the</strong>r organised crime<br />
has lost some of <strong>the</strong> dedicated focus that was beneficial. Ano<strong>the</strong>r consequence of <strong>the</strong> focus<br />
on crime is that it is all too common to see victims of traffick<strong>in</strong>g who have been <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong><br />
20. Council of Europe (2005) Council of Europe Convention on Action Aga<strong>in</strong>st Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs: Explanatory note, article 1b http://<br />
www.coe.<strong>in</strong>t/t/e/human_rights/traffick<strong>in</strong>g/PDF_conv_197_traffick<strong>in</strong>g_e.pdf<br />
21. Council of Europe (2005) Council of Europe Convention on Action Aga<strong>in</strong>st Traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Human Be<strong>in</strong>gs: Explanatory note, article 26 http://<br />
www.coe.<strong>in</strong>t/t/e/human_rights/traffick<strong>in</strong>g/PDF_conv_197_traffick<strong>in</strong>g_e.pdf<br />
22. Hove, S. and Montier, S. (2011) ‘Safety and Support of Victims of Traffick<strong>in</strong>g for Sexual Exploitation <strong>in</strong> England and Wales’, p.186 <strong>in</strong> Chandran,<br />
P. (eds) (2011) Human Traffick<strong>in</strong>g Handbook: Recognis<strong>in</strong>g Traffick<strong>in</strong>g and Modern-Day Slavery <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>. London: Lexis Nexis<br />
23. Rights of Women (2010) Measur<strong>in</strong>g up? <strong>UK</strong> compliance with <strong>in</strong>ternational commitments on violence aga<strong>in</strong>st women <strong>in</strong> England and Wales.<br />
ROW: London http://www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/pdfs/Measur<strong>in</strong>g_up_A_report_by_Rights_of_Women.pdf<br />
24. Anti Traffick<strong>in</strong>g Monitor<strong>in</strong>g Group (ATMG) (2012) All Change: Prevent<strong>in</strong>g traffick<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> http://t<strong>in</strong>yurl.com/c6k2uyx<br />
25. Rights of Women (2010) Measur<strong>in</strong>g up? <strong>UK</strong> compliance with <strong>in</strong>ternational commitments on violence aga<strong>in</strong>st women <strong>in</strong> England and Wales.<br />
ROW: London http://www.rightsofwomen.org.uk/pdfs/Measur<strong>in</strong>g_up_A_report_by_Rights_of_Women.pdf<br />
26. Government Equalities Office (2011) CEDAW (Convention on <strong>the</strong> Elim<strong>in</strong>ation of all forms of Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation aga<strong>in</strong>st Women) report. United<br />
K<strong>in</strong>gdom’s Seventh Periodic Report. GEO: London http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/equalities/<strong>in</strong>ternational-<strong>equality</strong>/7thcedaw-report?view=B<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
Paragraph 64<br />
<strong>Women’s</strong> <strong>equality</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong>: CEDAW shadow report 2013 53