20.05.2013 Views

PROGRAMME AND ABSTRACTS - Università degli Studi di Messina

PROGRAMME AND ABSTRACTS - Università degli Studi di Messina

PROGRAMME AND ABSTRACTS - Università degli Studi di Messina

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PANEL 6<br />

Tue 15 th , 9.00-12.20 / 15.00-17.00, Classroom 9<br />

Fabio Mora, University of <strong>Messina</strong>, Italy<br />

La ricezione del testo sacro<br />

The Circulated Sacred Text<br />

The study of sacred, canonical texts may not substitute the empirical observation of the<br />

religious communities which are founded on them. But their reception and regular use of these<br />

texts is very important in their religious identities. The circulated text, i.e. the sacred text not as<br />

it was written, but as it is (collectively) read, rewritten, quoted should remain central in the<br />

study of a “written” religion. This is true for every religion with sacred text(s), but develops<br />

some special sense, in those religions who do not have only a single sacred text by a single<br />

human author (as Islam does), but rather a collection of texts by <strong>di</strong>fferents authors over time, or<br />

do share part of their sacred texts with other religious communities, as the Christians do with<br />

the Jews, the Mormons with both Christians and Jews, the Bahais with the Moslems. Here<br />

praxis and theory should carefully be compared – theory often simplifies and does not express<br />

the real religious dynamics. All Christians do accept the Old Testament as sacred text and<br />

postpone it to the New, but Christian confessions could be usefully be classified, and besser<br />

understood, by analyzing how much they do istitutionally read and quote the two Testaments,<br />

by their respective Anthologized Bibles – such an analysis would however show that not the<br />

two corpora, but every single book, group of books or section of book polarizes the attention of<br />

<strong>di</strong>fferent confessions. Historically Christianity as a whole is as much defined by respect for<br />

New Testament as by selective lack of interest for Torah and practical oblivion of its legal<br />

parts, but every single confession show <strong>di</strong>fferent attitudes to every single book of both<br />

Testaments. Judaism acknowledges theoretically three levels of sacredness to its Bible: Torah<br />

must be read completely in liturgical assemblies, Prophets are read only selectively, Writings<br />

are not to be read liturgically, with the (late) exception of the five Megillot; but in the detail<br />

how much is the Hebrew anthology of Bible (other than Torah) dominated by the Christian<br />

interference? Outside the Christian-Jew schisma, which is the respective role of the Christian<br />

Testaments and their own Scripture among the Latter Day Saints? Papers may be submitted in<br />

any of the official languages of the Congress and should either deal with comparative issues in<br />

the experience of sacred texts or with the empirical reshaping of the sacred text in any single<br />

religious confession.<br />

Cohen Naomi<br />

16<br />

The Haftarot (the lections froms Prophets) chosen to be read in the<br />

Synagogue Service<br />

Ibba Giovanni Gli scritti mosaici ed enochici nel giudaismo tra il II secolo a.C. ed il I d.C.<br />

Morgenstern Matthias Anmerkungen zur talmu<strong>di</strong>schen Bibelhermeneutik

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!