Ethnic Hostility among Ethnic Majority and Minority Groups

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bibliography Buijs, F. J., Demant, F., & Hamdy, A. (2006). Strijders van eigen bodem. Radicale en democratische moslims in Nederland. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. CDA en PvdA willen harde aanpak jongeren; bovengemiddeld vaak werkloos en crimineel. (2008, 19 March). Het Parool. Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion. Developing a defi nition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273-302. Coenders, M. (2001). Nationalistic attitudes and ethnic exclusionism in a comparative perspective. Radboud University, Nijmegen. Coenders, M., Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2005). Majorities’ Attitudes towards Migrants and Minorities. Vienna: European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia. Coenders, M., Lubbers, M., & Scheepers, P. (2007). From a distance. Avoidance of social contacts with immigrants in the European union. In E. Poppe & M. Verkuyten (Eds.), Culture and Confl ict. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers. Coenders, M., Lubbers, M., Scheepers, P., & Verkuyten, M. (2008). More than two decades of changing ethnic attitudes in the Netherlands. Journal of Social Issues, 64(2), 269-285. Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (1998). Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979- 1993: Effects of period, cohort and individual characteristics. European Sociological Review, 14(4), 405-422. Coenders, M., & Scheepers, P. (2003). The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: An international comparison. Political Psychology, 24(2), 313-343. Coffé, H., & Geys, B. (2006). Community heterogeneity: A burden for the creation of social capital? Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1053-1072. Coser, L. A. (1956). The functions of social confl ict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Cox, D. R. (1990). Role of models in statistical analysis. Statistical Science, 5(2), 169-174. Dagevos, J., Gijsberts, M., Kappelhof, J., & Vervoort, M. (2007). Survey Integratie Minderheden 2006. Verantwoording van de opzet en uitvoering van een survey onder Turken, Marokkanen, Surinamers, Antillianen en een autochtone vergelijkingsgroep. Den Haag: Netherlands Institute for Social Research (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau (SCP)). Dagevos, J., Gijsberts, M., & van Praag, C. (2003). Rapportage minderheden 2003. Onderwijs, arbeid en sociaal-culturele integratie. Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau (SCP). Dalhouse, M., & Frideres, J. S. (1996). Intergenerational conqruency, the role of the family in political attitudes of youth. Journal of Family Issues, 17(2), 227-248. Davies, R., Heinesen, E., & Holm, A. (2002). The relative risk aversion hypothesis of educational choice. Journal of Population Economics, 15(4), 683-713. De Graaf, N. D. (1991). Distinction by consumption in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 7(3), 267-290. De Graaf, N. D., Nieuwbeerta, P., & Heath, A. (1995). Class mobility and political preferences: Individual and contextual effects. The American Journal of Sociology, 100(4), 997-1027. De Graaf, P. M., & Luijkx, R. (1995). Paden naar succes: geboorte of diploma? In W. C. Ultee & J. Dronkers (Eds.), Verschuivende ongelijkheid in Nederland: Sociale gelaagdheid en mobiliteit. Assen: Van Gorcum. 237
De Graaf, P. M., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2003). The effects of social background, sex, and ability on the transition to tertiary eduation in the Netherlands. The Netherlands’ Journal of Social Sciences, 39(3), 172-201. De Jong, U., Van Leeuwen, Roeleveld, & Webbing. (1998). Deelname aan hoger onderwijs: Studiekeuze en motieven van eerstejaars 1995/96. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut / SEO. Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2005). Predicting cross-national levels of social trust: Global pattern or Nordic exceptionalism? European Sociological Review, 21(4), 311-327. Driessen, G. (2000). The limits of educational policy and practice? The case of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. Comparative Education, 36(1), 55-72. Dronkers, J., & Ultee, W. C. (1995). Verschuivende ongelijkheid in Nederland: Sociale gelaagdheid en mobiliteit. Assen: Van Gorcum. Durkheim, E. (1987 [1897]). Suicide. A study in sociology. New York: Free Press. Dykstra, P. A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T. C. M., Komter, A. E., Liefbroer, A. C., & Mulder, C. H. (2004). Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a multi-actor, multi-method panel study on solidarity in family relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper No. 1. The Hague: Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. Eisinga, R., Coenders, M., Felling, A., te Grotenhuis, M., Oomens, S., & Scheepers, P. (2002). Religion in Dutch society 2000. Documentation of a national survey on religious and secular attitudes in 2000. Amsterdam: Steinmetz Archive. Eisinga, R., De Graaf, N. D., Levels, M., Need, A., & Scheepers, P. (2008). Religion in Dutch society 2005. Documentation of a national survey on religious and secular attitudes in 2005. The Hague: Dans. Eisinga, R., Felling, A., Konig, R., Peters, J., & Scheepers, P. (1999). Religion in Dutch society 95. Documentation of a national survey on religious and secular attitudes in 1995. Amstersdam: Steinmetz Archive. Emmer, P. (2007, 10 November). ‘Van de Antillen blijf je af.’ Hoezo? NRC Handelsblad. Engelen, E. E. (2008). WRR rapport Identifi catie met Nederland [special issue]. Migrantenstudies, 24(3). Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship (pp. 59-86). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three West European countries: England, France & Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 10(79), 415-441. Evans, G., & Need, A. (2002). Explaining ethnic polarization over attitudes towards minority rights in Eastern Europe: a multilevel analysis. Social Science Research, 31(4), 635-680. Flap, H. (1999). Buurt of gemeenschap: Meeting of mating. In B. Völker & R. Verhoeff (Eds.), Buren en buurten. (pp. 11-33). Amsterdam: SISWO. Fortuyn: grens dicht voor islamiet. (2002, 9 February). de Volkskrant. Ganzeboom, H., & Luijkx, R. (2004). Recent trends in intergenerational occupational class reproduction in the Netherlands 1970-99. In R. Breen (Ed.), Social mobility in Europe 238
Page 1 and 2:
ETHNIC HOSTILITY AMONG ETHNIC MAJOR
Page 3:
Promotores: prof. dr. N. D. de Graa
Page 6 and 7:
Science is so much more fun when yo
Page 8 and 9:
3.4.1 Opposition to ethnic intermar
Page 10:
8.3.1 Theoretical implications for
Page 14 and 15:
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 NEW QUESTIONS 1
Page 16 and 17:
1. Introduction | New questions ski
Page 18 and 19:
1. Introduction | The setting of th
Page 20 and 21:
1. Introduction | Research question
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Table 1.1 Outline of empirical chap
Page 28:
1. Introduction | Notes 27
Page 32 and 33:
2. SOCIAL MOBILITY AND ETHNIC HOSTI
Page 34 and 35:
2. Social Mobility and Ethnic Hosti
Page 36 and 37:
social conformity favour more toler
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
e more important than the infl uenc
Page 42 and 43:
2.4 RESULTS 2. Social Mobility and
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48:
Page 51 and 52:
1987). Assessment of the importance
Page 53 and 54:
The actual ethnic competition withi
Page 55 and 56:
(Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006). Wagner e
Page 57 and 58:
seven categories: no-religion, Roma
Page 59 and 60:
the lower the opposition to ethnic
Page 61 and 62:
Table 3.1 Hierarchical linear inter
Page 63 and 64:
Table 3.2 Hierarchical linear inter
Page 65 and 66:
In model 8 we focus on the characte
Page 67 and 68:
Table 3.3 Comparison of explanatory
Page 69 and 70:
3.5 CONCLUSIONS We observed a weak
Page 71 and 72:
9. The models presented in this cha
Page 74 and 75:
4. THE LOCAL LIVING ENVIRONMENT AND
Page 76 and 77:
unit such as states or countries, w
Page 78 and 79:
4. The Local Living Environment and
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
4.4 RESULTS 4. The Local Living Env
Page 86 and 87:
Table 4.2 continued Household compo
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92:
Page 96 and 97:
5. TRENDS IN ETHNIC EDUCATIONAL INE
Page 98 and 99:
5. Trends in Ethnic Educational Ine
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
the worsening economic conditions o
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Table 5.3 continued Male (Female=re
Page 112 and 113:
Table 5.4 continued Male (Female= r
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
6. EXPLANATIONS FOR ETHNIC EDUCATIO
Page 120 and 121:
To answer our research questions, w
Page 122 and 123:
6. Explanations for Ethnic Educatio
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Table 6.1 continued Pre-university
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Table 6.2 continued Lower general t
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Model 4 includes both the ability m
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
7. EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT AND ETHNI
Page 146 and 147:
among four ethnic minority groups i
Page 148 and 149:
7. Educational Attainment and Ethni
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Table 7.1 Summary of hypotheses Cor
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Table 7.2 continued Control variabl
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Table 7.3 continued 2nd gen. Turks
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Table 7.4 continued 2nd gen. Turks
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168:
Page 172 and 173:
8. CONCLUSION 8.1 INTRODUCTION 8. C
Page 174 and 175:
8.2 QUESTIONS, RESULTS AND CONCLUSI
Page 176 and 177:
8. Conclusion | Questions, results
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
local living environments (on ethni
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189: 8. Conclusion | Questions, results
Page 190 and 191: 8. Conclusion | Theoretical implica
Page 192 and 193: ethnic hosting threat contact / res
Page 194 and 195: 8. Conclusion | Retrospect and pros
Page 196 and 197: 8. Conclusion | Notes 195
Page 198 and 199: APPENDIX Appendix 197
Page 200 and 201: APPENDIX 2.2 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS
Page 202 and 203: Appendix 2.3 continued Mobility typ
Page 204 and 205: APPENDIX 2.4 TUTORIAL DIAGONAL MOBI
Page 206 and 207: *********MEANS and OLS***********.
Page 208 and 209: impact on depY. *The relative impac
Page 210 and 211: Appendix *The impact of the destina
Page 212 and 213: vector d = d1 to d6. vector p = p1
Page 214 and 215: *and with constraints our model wou
Page 216 and 217: Appendix 215
Page 218 and 219: Appendix 3.1 continued father’s s
Page 220 and 221: APPENDIX 3.3 OPPOSITION TO ETHNIC I
Page 222 and 223: Appendix Appendix 4.1 continued Eco
Page 224 and 225: Appendix APPENDIX 4.3 VARIANCE COMP
Page 226 and 227: Appendix 5.1 continued Ethnicity N
Page 228 and 229: APPENDIX 5.3 ROBUSTNESS OF ES ASSOC
Page 230 and 231: Appendix APPENDIX 5.5 MULTI-NOMINAL
Page 232 and 233: Appendix 7.1 continued 2nd gen. 2nd
Page 234 and 235: Appendix 233
Page 236 and 237: BIBLIOGRAPHY Bibliography Abu-Rayya
Page 240 and 241: Bibliography (pp. 345-383). Oxford:
Page 242 and 243: Bibliography euthanasia, homosexual
Page 244 and 245: Bibliography Onderzoek (ISEO). Mart
Page 246 and 247: Bibliography Politics, 58(1), 41-72
Page 248 and 249: Bibliography Worchel (Eds.), The so
Page 250 and 251: Bibliography 249
Page 252 and 253: Summary in Dutch / Nederlandstalige
Page 264 and 265: CURRICULUM VITAE Curriculum Vitae J
Page 266 and 267: ICS DISSERTATION SERIES ICS dissert
Page 268 and 269: ICS dissertation series 37) Andreas
Page 270 and 271: ICS dissertation series 76) Inge Si
Page 272 and 273: ICS dissertation series 115) Martin
Page 274: Why do some individuals express mor
show all

Ethnic Hostility among Ethnic Majority and Minority Groups

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?