£*•

204 ESOTERIC ANTHROPOLOGY.
had a thin beard, and a voice like a delicate youth. She
dressed like a woman at times, but often like a man.
As a woman, there was something masculine in her
gait and manners ; as a man, she was effeminate, and
had a womanish love for ribbons and ornaments. Her
soul seemed even more bi-sexual than her bodily or
gans. If, as is supposed, the masculine gender
is the
fullest development, nature, in her case, went too far
for a woman, and not far enough for a man.
SEX IN MIND.
The last case proves, what is apparent to every ob
server, that the influence of sex runs through the
whole mental and moral character. Men differ from
women as much in brain as in body. They have cer
tain organs relatively larger, and others relatively
Bmaller, than women. The moral organs correspond
intimately with all physical differences. There is a
vast number of traits of character connected with the
testes and its secretion in the male, as well as in the
ovaries, uterus, clitoris, and mammary glands of the fe
male. No man can know what a world of delicate
tenderness finds its seat in a woman's swelling bosom;
so no woman can know all the nobility
centers in the virile organs of the man.
of manhood that
If we could compare the most masculine woman
with the most feminine man, there would still be a
wide difference. But this wide difference does not
prove that woman was intended to be the slave, the
tool, and the victim of man, as she is and has been.
In making her such, man wrongs his own nature as
much as he
wrongs hers, and he wrongs the whole hu-