07.06.2013 Views

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

Results<br />

11–324 days). There was one discontinuation in<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>prednisone</strong> only group due to toxicity.<br />

CALGB 9182 32<br />

This RCT included 242 men <strong>with</strong> mHRPC; 119<br />

patients were randomised to receive an<br />

intravenous infusion <strong>of</strong> mitoxantrone (14 mg/m 2<br />

every 21 days) plus <strong>or</strong>al hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone (40 mg in<br />

two divided doses every day), herein referred to as<br />

<strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone group, and 123 patients were<br />

randomised to receive <strong>or</strong>al hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone (40 mg<br />

in two divided doses every day) only, herein<br />

referred to as <strong>the</strong> hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone group. Patients<br />

were stratified by baseline disease status<br />

(measurable versus assessable) and ECOG<br />

perf<strong>or</strong>mance status sc<strong>or</strong>e. After <strong>the</strong> accrual <strong>of</strong> 60<br />

patients, a third stratification by number <strong>of</strong> pri<strong>or</strong><br />

endocrine manipulations was added.<br />

The baseline characteristics <strong>of</strong> patients across<br />

<strong>the</strong> groups appear to have been reasonably well<br />

balanced in terms <strong>of</strong> age, race, sites <strong>of</strong><br />

metastases, years since diagnosis, PSA level and<br />

QoL. However, <strong>the</strong>re was a tendency f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

patients in <strong>the</strong> hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone group to have<br />

received m<strong>or</strong>e <strong>treatment</strong>s <strong>with</strong> a progesterone<br />

agent than <strong>the</strong> patients in <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone group<br />

(18% <strong>of</strong> patients in <strong>the</strong> hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone group<br />

compared <strong>with</strong> 7% <strong>of</strong> patients in <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

group).<br />

F<strong>or</strong> inclusion in <strong>the</strong> trial, patients had to have<br />

metastatic adenocarcinoma <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prostate, <strong>with</strong><br />

documented disease progression, and had to have<br />

received no m<strong>or</strong>e than one pri<strong>or</strong> endocrine<br />

manipulation. However, <strong>the</strong> latter criterion was<br />

removed after <strong>the</strong> accrual <strong>of</strong> 60 patients f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

trial, allowing patients <strong>with</strong> potentially po<strong>or</strong>er<br />

prognoses to be eligible f<strong>or</strong> inclusion in <strong>the</strong> trial.<br />

Patients were also required to have adequate<br />

hepatic, renal and bone marrow functions.<br />

Two patients in each <strong>treatment</strong> arm never started<br />

<strong>treatment</strong> and were excluded from <strong>the</strong> analyses.<br />

Four fur<strong>the</strong>r participants, three in <strong>the</strong><br />

hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone group and one in <strong>the</strong><br />

mitoxantrone group, were ruled ineligible f<strong>or</strong><br />

inclusion, but were included in <strong>the</strong> survival<br />

analysis only.<br />

The median number <strong>of</strong> cycles <strong>of</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

administered was five. No crossovers were<br />

permitted, although alternative chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy<br />

regimes were allowed after disease progression.<br />

Hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone <strong>treatment</strong> was continued in all<br />

patients, until disease progression <strong>or</strong> <strong>treatment</strong><br />

failure, and was encouraged until death.<br />

Quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials comparing mitoxantrone plus<br />

a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid <strong>with</strong> a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid<br />

Berry and colleagues 30<br />

This was a small, randomised, open-label,<br />

comparative trial. The methods used to assign<br />

patients to <strong>treatment</strong> groups and concealment <strong>of</strong><br />

allocation were not rep<strong>or</strong>ted, so <strong>the</strong> adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se procedures cannot be assessed. Baseline<br />

comparability between <strong>the</strong> two groups appears to<br />

have been achieved. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial in<br />

relation to study quality is shown in Appendix 7.<br />

CCI-NOV22 31<br />

This was a reasonably small, open-label,<br />

comparative trial. The method used to assign<br />

participants to <strong>treatment</strong> groups was not rep<strong>or</strong>ted,<br />

so <strong>the</strong> randomisation procedure cannot be<br />

assessed f<strong>or</strong> adequacy. The two <strong>treatment</strong> groups<br />

were not completely comparable at baseline. The<br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial in relation to study quality is<br />

shown in Appendix 7.<br />

CALGB 9182 32<br />

This was a randomised, open-label, comparative<br />

trial. The methods <strong>of</strong> randomisation and<br />

concealment <strong>of</strong> allocation were not rep<strong>or</strong>ted and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e cannot be assessed f<strong>or</strong> adequacy, and <strong>the</strong><br />

number <strong>of</strong> pri<strong>or</strong> <strong>treatment</strong>s <strong>with</strong> a progesterone<br />

agent was not comparable at baseline between <strong>the</strong><br />

two groups. The evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trial in relation<br />

to study quality is shown in Appendix 7.<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mitoxantrone plus a<br />

c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid versus a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid<br />

Berry and colleagues 30<br />

Overall survival Among <strong>the</strong> 119 patients analysed<br />

in this trial, 91 (76%) died <strong>with</strong>in 4 years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

start <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study, 43 (77%) in <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

group and 48 (76%) in <strong>the</strong> <strong>prednisone</strong> group. At<br />

12 months, survival was 82% in <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

group and 76% in <strong>the</strong> <strong>prednisone</strong> group. At<br />

24 months, survival was 45% f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

group and 44% f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>prednisone</strong> group.<br />

Estimated overall survival from <strong>the</strong> start <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>treatment</strong> was 23 months (range: 3–49 months) in<br />

<strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone group compared <strong>with</strong> 19 months<br />

(range: 2–50 months) in <strong>the</strong> <strong>prednisone</strong> group.<br />

This difference in overall survival was not<br />

statistically significant, <strong>with</strong> an estimated HR f<strong>or</strong><br />

death (calculated from numbers <strong>of</strong> events and<br />

p-value presented in <strong>the</strong> trial publication) <strong>of</strong> 1.127<br />

(95% CI: 0.747 to 1.7, p = 0.569).<br />

Progression-free survival Time to <strong>treatment</strong> failure<br />

(an aggregate end-point defined by <strong>the</strong> time<br />

between start <strong>of</strong> <strong>treatment</strong> and occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

progression, removal from study <strong>or</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!