07.06.2013 Views

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

Docetaxel with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Clinical evaluation<br />

We identified one trial that directly assessed <strong>the</strong><br />

intervention under consideration: docetaxel plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong>; this was in comparison <strong>with</strong><br />

mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong> (TAX 327). No<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r trials were found that assessed <strong>the</strong> clinical<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> docetaxel plus <strong>prednisone</strong>.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> this trial showed statistically<br />

significant improvements <strong>with</strong> 3-weekly docetaxel<br />

plus <strong>prednisone</strong> compared <strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong>, in terms <strong>of</strong> overall survival, QoL, pain<br />

response and PSA decline. The response rate was<br />

higher f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong> 3-weekly docetaxel plus <strong>prednisone</strong><br />

group than <strong>the</strong> mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong><br />

group, but this difference was not statistically<br />

significant. The improved outcomes f<strong>or</strong> docetaxel<br />

plus <strong>prednisone</strong> were associated <strong>with</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e grade<br />

3–4 adverse events; however, this had no<br />

detrimental effect on QoL, which was also<br />

significantly improved in <strong>the</strong> 3-weekly docetaxel<br />

group. Progression-free survival was not assessed<br />

in this trial. This was a large, well-conducted RCT<br />

and <strong>the</strong> results are likely to be reliable; however,<br />

<strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r studies available f<strong>or</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

evaluation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> docetaxel plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong> is a limitation <strong>of</strong> this review.<br />

Since docetaxel plus <strong>prednisone</strong> has only been<br />

directly compared <strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong>, we considered additional evidence<br />

which would permit a comparison <strong>of</strong> docetaxel<br />

plus <strong>prednisone</strong> <strong>with</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy-based<br />

<strong>treatment</strong>s and best supp<strong>or</strong>tive care. Theref<strong>or</strong>e, we<br />

searched f<strong>or</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>treatment</strong>s that were compared<br />

<strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone plus a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid, in <strong>or</strong>der<br />

to allow a comparison across <strong>the</strong> full range <strong>of</strong><br />

relevant <strong>treatment</strong> options. We found three trials<br />

that compared o<strong>the</strong>r chemo<strong>the</strong>rapy regimens <strong>with</strong><br />

mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong>: one trial that<br />

compared mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong> <strong>with</strong><br />

docetaxel plus <strong>prednisone</strong> plus estramustine, one<br />

trial that compared mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong><br />

<strong>with</strong> docetaxel plus estramustine and one trial that<br />

compared mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong> <strong>with</strong><br />

mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong> plus clodronate.<br />

Both <strong>treatment</strong>s that included docetaxel were<br />

superi<strong>or</strong> to mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong> in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> overall survival (although <strong>the</strong> difference was not<br />

Chapter 7<br />

Discussion<br />

© Queen’s Printer and Controller <strong>of</strong> HMSO 2007. All rights reserved.<br />

Health Technology Assessment 2007; Vol. 11: No. 2<br />

statistically significant f<strong>or</strong> docetaxel plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong> plus estramustine), response rate<br />

(although <strong>the</strong> difference was not statistically<br />

significant f<strong>or</strong> docetaxel plus estramustine), and<br />

progression-free survival (although this was only<br />

assessed f<strong>or</strong> docetaxel plus estramustine in<br />

comparison <strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong>).<br />

<strong>Docetaxel</strong> plus estramustine was associated <strong>with</strong><br />

m<strong>or</strong>e adverse events compared <strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone<br />

plus <strong>prednisone</strong>. No significant differences were<br />

found between mitoxantrone plus <strong>prednisone</strong><br />

plus clodronate and mitoxantrone plus<br />

<strong>prednisone</strong> <strong>with</strong>out clodronate. A mixed<br />

<strong>treatment</strong> comparison has been presented<br />

inc<strong>or</strong>p<strong>or</strong>ating <strong>the</strong>se drug combinations. However,<br />

since we only searched f<strong>or</strong> trials which included<br />

docetaxel plus <strong>prednisone</strong>/<strong>prednisolone</strong> <strong>or</strong><br />

mitoxantrone plus a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>treatment</strong> arms, this should be interpreted <strong>with</strong><br />

caution as <strong>the</strong> search strategy did not include<br />

searches f<strong>or</strong> all available evidence that could<br />

inf<strong>or</strong>m this comparison. It is possible that o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

trials may exist that could inf<strong>or</strong>m this comparison<br />

but which did not meet our review inclusion<br />

criteria. Only <strong>the</strong> results f<strong>or</strong> overall survival were<br />

presented in <strong>the</strong> mixed <strong>treatment</strong> comparison,<br />

because <strong>the</strong> definitions and measurements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r outcomes varied across <strong>the</strong> trials and<br />

<strong>the</strong>ref<strong>or</strong>e it is impossible to make any comparisons<br />

between trials f<strong>or</strong> any o<strong>the</strong>r outcome, as discussed<br />

previously.<br />

In addition, three trials were found that compared<br />

mitoxantrone plus a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid <strong>with</strong> best<br />

supp<strong>or</strong>tive care, in <strong>the</strong> f<strong>or</strong>m <strong>of</strong> c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroids. No<br />

trials were identified that compared o<strong>the</strong>r f<strong>or</strong>ms <strong>of</strong><br />

best supp<strong>or</strong>tive care <strong>with</strong> mitoxantrone plus a<br />

c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid. Two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials used <strong>prednisone</strong><br />

(5 mg twice daily) as <strong>the</strong> comparat<strong>or</strong> and one<br />

compared mitoxantrone plus hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone <strong>with</strong><br />

hydroc<strong>or</strong>tisone (40 mg given in two divided doses<br />

daily). One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trials comparing mitoxantrone<br />

plus a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid <strong>with</strong> a c<strong>or</strong>ticosteroid included<br />

men <strong>with</strong> asymptomatic mHRPC, ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

included men <strong>with</strong> symptomatic mHRPC and <strong>the</strong><br />

third included all men <strong>with</strong> progressive mHRPC.<br />

This difference in disease severity between<br />

patients included in <strong>the</strong> trials may have affected<br />

<strong>the</strong> results, as mitoxantrone was m<strong>or</strong>e effective in<br />

<strong>the</strong> trial <strong>of</strong> patients <strong>with</strong> symptoms <strong>of</strong> pain<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!