13.08.2013 Views

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

110 CRITICAL ISSUES IN SHARED LEADERSHIP<br />

needs of the administrators who administered them. A more recent contribution to the state of<br />

rural special education administration came from Bays (2001). He asserted that in rural school<br />

districts, the supervision of instruction in special education classrooms was assigned to<br />

principals who balanced competing priorities such as management and supervision,<br />

monitoring for legal compliance and supervision of instruction for students with disabilities,<br />

and evaluation of teachers and supervision of instruction. Bays (2001) suggested that this may<br />

be placing compliance and management aspects of IDEA over actual instructional support.<br />

The dearth of research about the role of rural school administrators and the<br />

administration of special education programs limits the understanding about how special<br />

education programs are administered in rural and often isolated schools in states such as<br />

Montana, Wyoming and Alaska. Concurrently, we know little about who does the specific<br />

tasks necessary in administering effective special education programs in rural schools. This<br />

study was designed to establish a descriptive understanding about the tasks associated with<br />

leadership in small rural school districts. From the preliminary descriptive data gathered in<br />

this study, we were able to contribute to baseline information necessary to improve rural<br />

education leadership and leadership preparation.<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

The participants in this study included 30 small school district superintendents,<br />

superintendent/principals, and principals whose districts were members of the Montana Rural<br />

Education Association (MREA). The superintendents of the 150 MREA member districts<br />

received a request to complete the special education functions survey. They were further<br />

asked to forward the survey request to the principals in their districts. Of the 30 respondents<br />

completing surveys, 19 were superintendents, three were superintendent/principals, and eight<br />

were principals. More than 70% of the respondents had more than 7 years of experience and<br />

only 7 % had less than 3 years of experience in their current position. More than half of those<br />

sampled had more than 25 years of experience as educators.<br />

Most (73.3%) of the respondents worked in K-12 school districts, and the remaining<br />

respondents worked in K-8 school districts. The mean enrollment in the districts was 353<br />

students with a range of 56 students to 1200 students.<br />

This study piloted a survey created by the researchers. The 49 survey items listed in<br />

Table 1 collectively described the administrative special education functions in schools that<br />

the participants were asked to answer by indicating one of the following four forced-choice<br />

responses:<br />

1. Not Delegated = You address this task yourself.<br />

2. Partially Delegated to Subordinate = You substantially address this task with some<br />

delegation to a subordinate (a district employee) in your district or school.<br />

3. Substantially Delegated to Subordinate = You delegate this task to someone else (a<br />

district employee) in your district or school.<br />

4. Substantially Delegated Outside District = This task is fully or substantially<br />

addressed by someone (NOT a district employee) in a consortium, cooperative, or<br />

some other entity acting on the district’s behalf.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!