Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Complexities in the Workload of Principals:<br />
Implications for Teacher Leadership<br />
29<br />
CRITICAL ISSUES IN SHARED LEADERSHIP<br />
Caryn M. Wells<br />
C. Robert Maxfield<br />
Barbara A. Klocko<br />
Across America, school districts are facing profound challenges, casting the bright<br />
light of attention on its leaders. Principals are listed as central to the increased improvement,<br />
development of learning communities, and teacher leadership for their schools (Capers, 2004;<br />
Fleming, 2004; Fullan, 2001, 2008; Hess & Kelly, 2007; Hord, 2004; Hord & Sommers,<br />
2008; Smylie & Denny, 1990; York-Barr, 2004). While principals are engaged in the<br />
managerial tasks of the school, securing the building for safety, ensuring bus routes, student<br />
schedules, and the day-to-day management tasks, the instructional needs of the faculty and<br />
students compete for attention. In the era of No Child Left Behind (2001) Public Law 107-110,<br />
accountability for test scores, improved student achievement, and public outcry for teacher<br />
improvements, the expectation for instructional leadership results in demands that building<br />
principals take on new and demanding roles (Ash, & Pearsall, 2000; Cooley & Shen, 2003;<br />
Hess & Kelly, 2007, Schoen & Fusarelli, 2008).<br />
It has long been recognized that principals are involved with expectations that make<br />
their jobs ones that are full of interactions that are fragmented, brief, and unrelenting<br />
(Hallinger, 1992, Kafka, 2009, Louis et al., 2010). A review of recent research revealed that<br />
principals are under new pressures and enormous stress as they juggle demands for quality<br />
while responding to changes in demographics, parental involvement, curricular and<br />
technological changes, and instructional improvements (Browne-Ferrigno, 2003; Cooley &<br />
Shen, 2003; Griffith, 1999; Marks & Printy, 2003; Petzko, 2008; Pounder & Merrill, 2001).<br />
Kafka (2009) indicated that the role of the principal has always been complex and<br />
multifaceted, and she concluded, “What is new is the degree to which schools are expected to<br />
resolve society’s social and educational inequities in a market-based environment” (p.328).<br />
While principals deal with the increased and continued pressures, teacher leadership<br />
offers possibilities for growth and change in schools. Teacher leadership shows promise for<br />
the potential contributions to teacher effectiveness and student achievement (Cochran-Smith<br />
& Lytle, 2000; Silva, Gimbert, & Nolan, 2000; Smylie & Denny, 1990; York-Barr & Duke,<br />
2004). As teachers expand their leadership in the schools, the balance of leadership with the<br />
principal undergoes change (York-Barr & Duke, 2004). Teacher leadership includes the use<br />
of teacher talent to bring about improvements in teaching effectiveness and student<br />
achievement (Mullen & Hutinger, 2008; Ogawa & Bossert, 1995; Smylie & Denny, 1990;<br />
Spillane, 2006). In this chapter, we investigate the relationship of contemporary principal<br />
workload pressures with the intricacies involved with teacher leadership. It is a story told<br />
through the eyes of principals who are busy completing the tasks that have been delineated in<br />
this introduction.<br />
________________________<br />
Caryn M. Wells, Oakland University<br />
C. Robert Maxfield, Oakland University<br />
Barbara A. Klocko, Central Michigan University