13.08.2013 Views

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182 CRITICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT<br />

viewed as an evolving long-term change at the deepest levels of belief about how humans<br />

learn” (p. 17).<br />

Too often, multiage classrooms have been implemented for the wrong reason and<br />

without proper planning, training, or commitment. The professional development of teachers<br />

who were implementing the multiage educational programs needs to be reviewed, planned,<br />

and disciplined in a way that provides the support and resources necessary for the<br />

implementation of a second order change which is perceived as a break from the past (Waters<br />

& Grubb, 2005). Second order changes are complex; new knowledge and skills are required<br />

for implementation; and the change conflicts with current values and norms and is outside the<br />

existing paradigms (Marzano, Waters, & McNulty, 2005). First order change is perceived as<br />

an extension of the past, which fits within existing paradigms. It is consistent with prevailing<br />

values and norms and can be implemented with existing knowledge and skills (Marzano,<br />

Waters, & McNulty, 2005).<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

This mixed methods study was designed to examine principals’ and teachers’<br />

knowledge and beliefs of multiage programming. A survey was provided to 91 participants to<br />

discover the factors which principals and teachers believed contributed to the successful or the<br />

limited implementation of multiage programs in their schools. After analyzing the data from<br />

the survey and discovering areas where the participant did not agree with the beliefs, the<br />

researcher utilized the Sequential Explanatory Design (Clark & Creswell, 2007) to determine<br />

additional interview questions. The Sequential Explanatory Design is a logic model which<br />

uses information from the quantitative data collection in the first phase of the research and<br />

after analysis, the researchers discover areas where the subjects did not agree with the stated<br />

assumptions and connect that data to the second phase through the development of interview<br />

questions to clarify those areas.<br />

Sample and Procedures<br />

The states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri do not require<br />

schools to register their schools as multiage. The multiage schools were identified on their<br />

web sites; therefore, the researcher used a search engine, Google, to identify the number of<br />

schools in these states which had multiage classrooms. Once this population was identified, a<br />

snowball sampling method was used. This strategy involved asking each participant to refer<br />

the researchers to other participants (Merriam, 1988). Principals were asked to provide the<br />

survey to staff members who were willing to take the survey. This population was used in<br />

conjunction with the online survey for the quantitative portion of this mixed method research.<br />

Introductory e-mail invitations were sent to the 60 identified schools in Minnesota,<br />

Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri with a response by 19 principals and 72 teachers.<br />

An introductory e-mail was sent to the elementary principals of multiage schools in<br />

the Midwest. Included in the letter was (a) an overview of the study, (b) the importance of the<br />

study, (c) an invitation to participate in the survey, (d) the process and timelines for<br />

completing the survey, (e) safeguards for confidentiality and privacy, and (f) notice of<br />

informed consent. A link to the survey was included in the e-mail and the informed consent<br />

was addressed in the introduction to the survey. Anonymity, confidentiality, and privacy of<br />

responses were ensured through online participation. Participants provided consent to<br />

participate in the study by completing the survey. Once the principals received the e-mail and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!