Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
182 CRITICAL ISSUES IN PROMOTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT<br />
viewed as an evolving long-term change at the deepest levels of belief about how humans<br />
learn” (p. 17).<br />
Too often, multiage classrooms have been implemented for the wrong reason and<br />
without proper planning, training, or commitment. The professional development of teachers<br />
who were implementing the multiage educational programs needs to be reviewed, planned,<br />
and disciplined in a way that provides the support and resources necessary for the<br />
implementation of a second order change which is perceived as a break from the past (Waters<br />
& Grubb, 2005). Second order changes are complex; new knowledge and skills are required<br />
for implementation; and the change conflicts with current values and norms and is outside the<br />
existing paradigms (Marzano, Waters, & McNulty, 2005). First order change is perceived as<br />
an extension of the past, which fits within existing paradigms. It is consistent with prevailing<br />
values and norms and can be implemented with existing knowledge and skills (Marzano,<br />
Waters, & McNulty, 2005).<br />
METHODOLOGY<br />
This mixed methods study was designed to examine principals’ and teachers’<br />
knowledge and beliefs of multiage programming. A survey was provided to 91 participants to<br />
discover the factors which principals and teachers believed contributed to the successful or the<br />
limited implementation of multiage programs in their schools. After analyzing the data from<br />
the survey and discovering areas where the participant did not agree with the beliefs, the<br />
researcher utilized the Sequential Explanatory Design (Clark & Creswell, 2007) to determine<br />
additional interview questions. The Sequential Explanatory Design is a logic model which<br />
uses information from the quantitative data collection in the first phase of the research and<br />
after analysis, the researchers discover areas where the subjects did not agree with the stated<br />
assumptions and connect that data to the second phase through the development of interview<br />
questions to clarify those areas.<br />
Sample and Procedures<br />
The states of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri do not require<br />
schools to register their schools as multiage. The multiage schools were identified on their<br />
web sites; therefore, the researcher used a search engine, Google, to identify the number of<br />
schools in these states which had multiage classrooms. Once this population was identified, a<br />
snowball sampling method was used. This strategy involved asking each participant to refer<br />
the researchers to other participants (Merriam, 1988). Principals were asked to provide the<br />
survey to staff members who were willing to take the survey. This population was used in<br />
conjunction with the online survey for the quantitative portion of this mixed method research.<br />
Introductory e-mail invitations were sent to the 60 identified schools in Minnesota,<br />
Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Missouri with a response by 19 principals and 72 teachers.<br />
An introductory e-mail was sent to the elementary principals of multiage schools in<br />
the Midwest. Included in the letter was (a) an overview of the study, (b) the importance of the<br />
study, (c) an invitation to participate in the survey, (d) the process and timelines for<br />
completing the survey, (e) safeguards for confidentiality and privacy, and (f) notice of<br />
informed consent. A link to the survey was included in the e-mail and the informed consent<br />
was addressed in the introduction to the survey. Anonymity, confidentiality, and privacy of<br />
responses were ensured through online participation. Participants provided consent to<br />
participate in the study by completing the survey. Once the principals received the e-mail and