13.08.2013 Views

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Creating Shared Meaning in High Performing, Low Socioeconomic Urban Elementary Schools 153<br />

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION<br />

The purpose of this study was to discover what leaders in two high-achieving, low-<br />

SES schools were doing to raise achievement scores. Analyzed data from principal and<br />

teacher interviews, observations, and artifacts revealed findings that are consistent with the<br />

literature about effective principal leadership behaviors in high performing schools. These<br />

leaders inspired their staffs and collaborated with them in a variety of ways. Principals Alpha<br />

and Beta demonstrated faith and trust in their teachers and helped teachers focus more on<br />

students by espousing teacher autonomy, sharing leadership responsibilities, clearly<br />

communicating goals and expectations, becoming very involved in instructional matters, and<br />

keeping consistent the classroom instructions regarding curriculum and lesson plans.<br />

While both principals were actively involved in classroom instruction and believed<br />

this involvement is their most important duty, Principals Alpha and Beta promoted teacher<br />

autonomy when new teachers have proven that they can produce good results with students.<br />

The principals first hired capable, willing, and caring teachers. Starting with a capable set of<br />

educators, the principals built trust and initiative in the teachers by encouraging individual<br />

and group decision making to solve problems or create solutions to improve students’<br />

performance.<br />

While both principals promoted autonomy for their teachers, each principal<br />

accomplished the task differently. For Principal Alpha, autonomy was tied to accountability.<br />

The teachers in Alpha’s school were expected to create solutions to their problems, and each<br />

teacher was accountable to every student in his or her classroom. For Principal Beta,<br />

autonomy was more related to each teacher having the freedom to find a better way to teach<br />

children and prove that the new method, procedure, or policy was beneficial to the students.<br />

In school B, responsibility for helping a student pass the state exam was not a burden to one<br />

teacher; everyone was responsible. As Beta stated, “I do not hold anyone responsible when<br />

students don’t pass [the state exam] because I know we know our students …. The students<br />

that didn’t pass in third grade are students that we had concerns about since kinder.”<br />

There is a strong element of shared decision making on both campuses. Both<br />

principals, accordingly, provided leadership opportunities for their teachers; they encouraged<br />

teachers who showed leadership potential to volunteer in various leadership capacities; and<br />

there was active principal-teacher collaboration and collaboration within teacher teams.<br />

With teachers handling classroom matters or solving curricular issues, the principals<br />

were able to focus on organizational, inspirational or transformational issues needed for<br />

developing a high performing school. The two principals had tremendous energy and stamina,<br />

contagious to everyone around them. Alpha and Beta were risk takers who were willing to try<br />

new ways suggested by staffs to help school performance. Both principals had high<br />

performance expectations for their faculty and students, and provided extra effort, “go the<br />

extra miles” to support their teachers and staff with material needs as well as moral care and<br />

encouragement.<br />

Students were comfortable interacting with each principal and seemed to look up to<br />

the principals, approaching them with concerns and updates about their lives trusting that<br />

these women believed in them. Common to the two principals in this study, the sine qua non<br />

of their life’s work, was the core belief that the students are the most important people in their<br />

schools, the reason for principals’ efforts to continue school improvement; both principals<br />

would have no second thoughts about releasing teachers who do not share this belief.<br />

The principals used a variety of means of communication to help build an effective<br />

and cohesive group of educators dedicated to do what it takes to help children in their schools

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!