Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Blazing New Trails - Connexions
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Creating Shared Meaning in High Performing, Low Socioeconomic Urban Elementary Schools 153<br />
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION<br />
The purpose of this study was to discover what leaders in two high-achieving, low-<br />
SES schools were doing to raise achievement scores. Analyzed data from principal and<br />
teacher interviews, observations, and artifacts revealed findings that are consistent with the<br />
literature about effective principal leadership behaviors in high performing schools. These<br />
leaders inspired their staffs and collaborated with them in a variety of ways. Principals Alpha<br />
and Beta demonstrated faith and trust in their teachers and helped teachers focus more on<br />
students by espousing teacher autonomy, sharing leadership responsibilities, clearly<br />
communicating goals and expectations, becoming very involved in instructional matters, and<br />
keeping consistent the classroom instructions regarding curriculum and lesson plans.<br />
While both principals were actively involved in classroom instruction and believed<br />
this involvement is their most important duty, Principals Alpha and Beta promoted teacher<br />
autonomy when new teachers have proven that they can produce good results with students.<br />
The principals first hired capable, willing, and caring teachers. Starting with a capable set of<br />
educators, the principals built trust and initiative in the teachers by encouraging individual<br />
and group decision making to solve problems or create solutions to improve students’<br />
performance.<br />
While both principals promoted autonomy for their teachers, each principal<br />
accomplished the task differently. For Principal Alpha, autonomy was tied to accountability.<br />
The teachers in Alpha’s school were expected to create solutions to their problems, and each<br />
teacher was accountable to every student in his or her classroom. For Principal Beta,<br />
autonomy was more related to each teacher having the freedom to find a better way to teach<br />
children and prove that the new method, procedure, or policy was beneficial to the students.<br />
In school B, responsibility for helping a student pass the state exam was not a burden to one<br />
teacher; everyone was responsible. As Beta stated, “I do not hold anyone responsible when<br />
students don’t pass [the state exam] because I know we know our students …. The students<br />
that didn’t pass in third grade are students that we had concerns about since kinder.”<br />
There is a strong element of shared decision making on both campuses. Both<br />
principals, accordingly, provided leadership opportunities for their teachers; they encouraged<br />
teachers who showed leadership potential to volunteer in various leadership capacities; and<br />
there was active principal-teacher collaboration and collaboration within teacher teams.<br />
With teachers handling classroom matters or solving curricular issues, the principals<br />
were able to focus on organizational, inspirational or transformational issues needed for<br />
developing a high performing school. The two principals had tremendous energy and stamina,<br />
contagious to everyone around them. Alpha and Beta were risk takers who were willing to try<br />
new ways suggested by staffs to help school performance. Both principals had high<br />
performance expectations for their faculty and students, and provided extra effort, “go the<br />
extra miles” to support their teachers and staff with material needs as well as moral care and<br />
encouragement.<br />
Students were comfortable interacting with each principal and seemed to look up to<br />
the principals, approaching them with concerns and updates about their lives trusting that<br />
these women believed in them. Common to the two principals in this study, the sine qua non<br />
of their life’s work, was the core belief that the students are the most important people in their<br />
schools, the reason for principals’ efforts to continue school improvement; both principals<br />
would have no second thoughts about releasing teachers who do not share this belief.<br />
The principals used a variety of means of communication to help build an effective<br />
and cohesive group of educators dedicated to do what it takes to help children in their schools