13.08.2013 Views

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

Blazing New Trails - Connexions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Service to the Profession: The Forgotten Element of Tenure and the Importance of Faculty Mentoring 327<br />

Fifty-seven professors (82.6%) collectively agreed with the statement that asked them<br />

if they had been made aware of their university’s tenure policy when hired. While they may<br />

have been made aware of the tenure policy, they may not have received detailed information<br />

regarding the quantitative requirements placed on each area. This was evident in the response<br />

rate when professors were asked if there had been a department mentor provided to them to<br />

help them understand how service was related to the tenure process. Thirty-five (50.7%)<br />

disagreed with this statement signifying they did not have a clear understanding of the service<br />

requirement for tenure. These results supported the need for additional mentoring and<br />

guidance for novice assistant professors on the tenure track.<br />

In regards to the opportunities for service at the various levels of the profession, it<br />

appeared that as the levels moved from department to international, the opportunities for the<br />

eight identified areas decreased in involvement. The majority of committee service was<br />

completed at the department (94.0%) and university levels (77.6%). This suggested that there<br />

are several opportunities at these levels for junior faculty for their consideration. The most<br />

common service opportunity at the state level was guest speaking (70.2%) which could also<br />

help to support a professor’s teaching and scholarly efforts by presenting research projects<br />

and teaching effectiveness at conferences and scholarly meetings.<br />

The possibilities for service venues at the national level showed the highest level of<br />

involvement by serving as a reviewer (87.3%), editor (66.7%), an assistant editor (64.3%), a<br />

board member (57.1%), and involvement in organizational activities (49.1%). National level<br />

of service could occur with the help of a tenured mentor who encourages networking and<br />

collaboration with junior faculty. The least involvement regarding service activity was seen at<br />

the international level which may be a result of limited opportunities, travel costs, and the<br />

time that would be taken away from teaching responsibilities. This is clearly an area of<br />

service that requires more discussion regarding possible endeavors.<br />

The tenure process is a journey that no junior faculty member should take alone. A<br />

mentor from the members of the existing faculty would provide a novice assistant professor<br />

with a guide through the formalities of the tenure process, a mentor that could lead them to<br />

service opportunities, and an advisor to help them understand the responsibilities of their new<br />

profession. The results of the qualitative data supported these suggestions on how to assist<br />

novice faculty by recognizing the importance of mentoring, sharing, and modeling. Boreen et<br />

al. (2000) emphasized that having a mentor in any situation that listens and shares experiences<br />

for the growth of another individual will certainly help in resolving “potential difficulties” (p.<br />

21). The potential difficulty that could face junior faculty is the inability to meet the tenure<br />

requirements for scholarship, teaching, and the forgotten area of service.<br />

With the uncertainty of the amount of or the opportunity for service activities, some<br />

junior faculty during their first years in higher education could become overwhelmed with the<br />

requirements of tenure and the expectations of their new position. To prevent this from<br />

happening, the assistance provided by a caring and concerned mentor is suggested. Mentors<br />

should be willing to help guide and nurture junior faculty by opening honest lines of<br />

communication, developing trusting relationships, and involving their charges in the daily<br />

operation procedures of university life. By taking these small efforts, junior faculty may be<br />

more inclined to use their time more effectively in the areas of scholarly and service-oriented<br />

projects.<br />

Supporting this thought, especially in regard to service, one of the professors shared<br />

he/she was able to help new faculty by "[identifying] those service opportunities that<br />

contribute to other parts of the work agendas, as opposed to those that are only time drains<br />

and do not further those agendas.” A mentor, according to another professor, leads junior

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!