15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Adjudicator to take over adjudication <strong>of</strong> fitness to practise hearings in<br />

relation to General Medical Council <strong>and</strong> General Optical Council cases, subject to<br />

provision for review by the higher courts on issues <strong>of</strong> fact <strong>and</strong> law. That Act also<br />

made provision to enable its jurisdiction to be extended to other regulators by<br />

means <strong>of</strong> an order under section 60 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Health</strong> Act 1999.<br />

9.13 The Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Adjudicator became a legal entity in January<br />

2010 but did not commence any adjudication functions. Following the General<br />

Election, the Coalition Government reviewed the case for an independent<br />

adjudicator. The Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> consulted on the matter, indicating that its<br />

preferred option was to abolish the Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Adjudicator<br />

<strong>and</strong> take steps to enhance the General Medical Council’s processes. The<br />

rationale for this was that such steps would deliver substantially the same<br />

benefits that an independent adjudicator would have delivered, but in a more cost<br />

effective manner. Following consultation, the Government confirmed that it would<br />

proceed with its preferred option <strong>and</strong> repeal the relevant statutory provisions<br />

through the <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Bill 2011.<br />

9.14 The effect <strong>of</strong> the Office <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Adjudicator’s abolition is that<br />

the regulators will continue to carry out adjudication at the first instance in fitness<br />

to practise hearings, subject to existing provisions in their governing legislation<br />

for review by the higher courts on issues <strong>of</strong> both fact <strong>and</strong> law.<br />

General Medical Council Reforms<br />

9.15 In 2011 the General Medical Council published proposals for the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service to assume responsibility for<br />

adjudication, including hearing cases that are currently heard by interim orders<br />

panels <strong>and</strong> fitness to practise panels. It is stated that the Tribunal Service would<br />

be operationally separate from the rest <strong>of</strong> the General Medical Council <strong>and</strong> would<br />

be responsible for the appointment <strong>and</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> tribunal members <strong>and</strong> case<br />

managers, the appointment <strong>of</strong> special advisers, <strong>and</strong> the appointment, training<br />

<strong>and</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> legal advisers. The Council have proposed a right <strong>of</strong> appeal<br />

against tribunal decisions where it is desirable for the protection <strong>of</strong> the public. The<br />

Tribunal Service would be required to report directly to Parliament on an annual<br />

basis. 11 It is expected that the Tribunal Service will be set up in shadow form by<br />

the summer <strong>of</strong> 2012 pending the introduction <strong>of</strong> new legislation in 2013. 12<br />

Provisional view<br />

9.16 In our view, Article 6 does not require a separate fitness to practise adjudicator.<br />

The test is whether sufficient guarantees exist to exclude any legitimate doubt <strong>of</strong><br />

impartiality, applying an objective st<strong>and</strong>ard. 13 This test enables the fitness to<br />

11 General Medical Council, Reform <strong>of</strong> the Fitness to Practise Procedures at the GMC: The<br />

Future <strong>of</strong> Adjudication <strong>and</strong> the Establishment <strong>of</strong> the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service:<br />

A Paper For <strong>Consultation</strong> (2011).<br />

12 General Medical Council, Summary <strong>of</strong> responses to our <strong>Consultation</strong>: The Future <strong>of</strong><br />

Adjudication <strong>and</strong> the Establishment <strong>of</strong> the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (2011),<br />

para 49.<br />

13 Findlay v UK (1997) 24 EHRR 221, 245.<br />

161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!