15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

workers), some are largely self-employed <strong>and</strong> work in the private sector (such as<br />

chiropractors <strong>and</strong> osteopaths), <strong>and</strong> other pr<strong>of</strong>essional groups work in private<br />

commercial firms (such as high street opticians <strong>and</strong> pharmacists).<br />

2.8 These differences impact on how each regulator approaches its core functions.<br />

For some pr<strong>of</strong>essions (such as doctors) the costs <strong>of</strong> regulatory failure are<br />

potentially considerable <strong>and</strong> consequently the approach <strong>of</strong> the regulator may be<br />

less flexible than for a pr<strong>of</strong>ession whose core tasks represent a lower negative<br />

impact in the case <strong>of</strong> regulatory failure. Furthermore, differences in the<br />

marketplace mean that some regulators undertake premises regulation, as well<br />

as regulating individual practitioners (see Part 11).<br />

2.9 There are also significant differences between the regulators in terms <strong>of</strong> their size<br />

<strong>and</strong> resources. The size <strong>of</strong> the regulators varies from the Pharmaceutical Society<br />

<strong>of</strong> Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> which has just over 2,000 individual registrants, to the Nursing<br />

<strong>and</strong> Midwifery Council which is the largest regulator with 665,599 registrants. 6<br />

Several regulators are responsible for one group <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essionals, whereas the<br />

<strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Council regulates 15 pr<strong>of</strong>essions (soon to increase to 17<br />

when they take over the regulation <strong>of</strong> herbal medicine practitioners <strong>and</strong> in<br />

Engl<strong>and</strong>, social workers). Some <strong>of</strong> the larger regulators may hear several<br />

hundred fitness to practise cases a year, while smaller regulators may hold less<br />

than ten hearings. As is clear from table 3 below, there is also variation in the<br />

fees charged, expenditure <strong>and</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> registrants.<br />

.<br />

Fee Expenditure (£M) Registrants<br />

GCC £1000 £2.9 2,918<br />

GDC £575 £26.8 95,583<br />

GMC £420 £87.3 248,287<br />

GOC £270 £5.1 24,628<br />

GOsC £750 £2.8 4,440<br />

GPhC £262 £8.3 68,590<br />

GSCC £30 £48.7 7 104,469<br />

HPC £76 £16.2 215,476<br />

NMC £76 £44.7 668,084<br />

PSNI £345 £0.86 2,060<br />

Table 3: Registration fees, expenditure <strong>and</strong> registrants <strong>of</strong> the regulators 8<br />

6 Enabling Excellence: Autonomy <strong>and</strong> Accountability for <strong>Health</strong>care Workers, <strong>Social</strong><br />

Workers <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Workers (2011) Cm 8008, p 27.<br />

7 Includes the Education Support Grant.<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!