15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.50 We do not think it is necessary for the statute to specify matters such as the<br />

format, timeframe <strong>and</strong> requirement to follow up with a formal response. These<br />

<strong>and</strong> other matters are already covered by other legal provisions, such as the<br />

Equality Act 2010 <strong>and</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ards identified in Coughlan set out above.<br />

2.51 As well as duties to consult the public, the statute would also place duties on the<br />

regulators to inform the public about its work. This is discussed in Part 4.<br />

Provisional Proposal 2-7: The statute should require the regulators to consult<br />

whenever issuing or varying anything which is binding, anything which sets a<br />

benchmark or st<strong>and</strong>ard, <strong>and</strong> a competency. The regulators should be required<br />

to consult such persons it considers appropriate, including:<br />

(1) members <strong>of</strong> the public, patients <strong>and</strong> service users;<br />

(2) registrants (including business registrants);<br />

(3) employers <strong>of</strong> registrants;<br />

(4) the other health <strong>and</strong> social care pr<strong>of</strong>essional regulators, the Council for<br />

<strong>Health</strong>care Regulatory Excellence, the health <strong>and</strong> social care inspectorates,<br />

the independent safeguarding authorities <strong>and</strong> any other regulatory bodies;<br />

(5) the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, Northern Irel<strong>and</strong> Executive, Scottish<br />

Government <strong>and</strong> Welsh Government;<br />

(6) pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies that represent registrants;<br />

(7) persons or bodies commissioning or funding the services provided by<br />

registrants or at a registered premises/business.<br />

PARLIAMENTARY ACCOUNTABILITY<br />

2.52 As described in Part 1, the regulators have historically been seen as accountable<br />

to registrants through the system <strong>of</strong> self-regulation. However, in law it has always<br />

been the case that as statutory bodies, the regulators are accountable to the UK<br />

Parliament (<strong>and</strong> in some cases also to the devolved assemblies).<br />

2.53 The Privy Council is theoretically the main accountability mechanism. For<br />

example, the regulators are required to seek the approval <strong>of</strong> the Privy Council in<br />

order to make or amend rules (see above) <strong>and</strong> are required to submit certain<br />

reports to the Privy Council (see below). The role <strong>of</strong> the Privy Council has been<br />

seen by Government as ensuring that there is some distance between the<br />

Government <strong>and</strong> the regulators, thus giving a measure <strong>of</strong> independence from<br />

Government. It is also claimed that the Privy Council ensures wider cross-<br />

Government participation <strong>and</strong> “is an important part <strong>of</strong> ‘joined-up Government’”. 29<br />

29 See, http:www//privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/work-<strong>of</strong>-the-privy-council<strong>of</strong>fice/pr<strong>of</strong>essional-bodies/<br />

(last visited 15 February 2012).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!