15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

power to make cost orders. 23<br />

9.30 The use <strong>of</strong> cost orders, which can be used to enforce case management<br />

directions, is discussed later in this Part.<br />

Provisional view<br />

9.31 Case management can help to ensure an effective <strong>and</strong> efficient hearing, as well<br />

as securing the right to a hearing within a reasonable time provided for in Article<br />

6(1). However, only some <strong>of</strong> the regulators currently have powers <strong>of</strong> case<br />

management. We provisionally propose that the statute should give all the<br />

regulators a broad power to establish rules for case management. The power<br />

could be used, for example, to allow the panels or case managers to give<br />

directions for the conduct <strong>of</strong> cases <strong>and</strong> for the consequences <strong>of</strong> failure to comply<br />

with such directions (such as making an order or the refusal <strong>of</strong> an application). It<br />

would also allow for st<strong>and</strong>ard directions to be issued.<br />

9.32 We welcome views on whether the statute should include a requirement that the<br />

regulators must conduct their fitness to practise proceedings expeditiously. We<br />

think that a better approach would be to provide that the overriding objective <strong>of</strong><br />

the Civil Procedure Rules is made part <strong>of</strong> the regulators’ fitness to practise<br />

procedures. This objective provides that courts must deal with cases justly, which<br />

includes amongst other matters ensuring that cases are dealt with expeditiously<br />

<strong>and</strong> fairly <strong>and</strong> in ways which are proportionate to for example the costs <strong>and</strong><br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> the case. 24 The overriding objective has already been incorporated<br />

in various forms in almost all court rules.<br />

Provisional Proposal 9-4: The statute should give all the regulators a broad<br />

power to establish rules for case management.<br />

Provisional Proposal 9-5: The statute should provide that the overriding<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> the Civil Procedure Rules – that cases must be dealt with justly –<br />

is made part <strong>of</strong> the regulators’ fitness to practise procedures.<br />

COMPOSITION OF PANELS<br />

9.33 All <strong>of</strong> the regulators are required to constitute <strong>and</strong> make rules governing the size<br />

<strong>and</strong> membership <strong>of</strong> Fitness to Practise Panels. At some regulators Panel<br />

appointments are undertaken by a separate appointments committee. Although<br />

these committees are appointed by the regulator, they <strong>of</strong>ten cannot include a<br />

Council member, member <strong>of</strong> a Committee or a Council employee. 25 Other<br />

regulators have entered into arrangements with the Appointments Commission to<br />

23 General Medical Council, Reform <strong>of</strong> the Fitness to Practise Procedures at the GMC: The<br />

Future <strong>of</strong> Adjudication <strong>and</strong> the Establishment <strong>of</strong> the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service:<br />

A Paper For <strong>Consultation</strong> (2011) paras 79 to 91.<br />

24 Civil Procedure Rules, rr 1.1 <strong>and</strong> 1.2.<br />

25 See, for example, General Pharmaceutical Council (Statutory Committees <strong>and</strong> their<br />

Advisers Rules) Order <strong>of</strong> Council 2010, SI 2010 No 1616.<br />

165

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!