15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

9.50 For most regulators the fitness to practise rules specify that the st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong><br />

is the civil st<strong>and</strong>ard, on the balance <strong>of</strong> probabilities. For some regulators the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard is not specified. However, section 112 <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Social</strong> <strong>Care</strong> Act<br />

2008 inserted section 60A into the <strong>Health</strong> Act 1999 which imposed a requirement<br />

for all the health regulators to use the civil st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>. This st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

applies only to findings <strong>of</strong> fact. Whether those facts amount to the statutory<br />

ground <strong>of</strong> the allegation <strong>and</strong> constitute impairment is not a matter which needs to<br />

be proved but is a matter <strong>of</strong> judgment for the Panel. 42 Case law has confirmed<br />

that there is no flexible civil st<strong>and</strong>ard <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>and</strong> the seriousness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

allegation has no special significance. 43<br />

Hearings in public<br />

9.51 The default position for most <strong>of</strong> the regulators is that hearings should be in public,<br />

meaning that non-parties can attend. This can apply to all or part <strong>of</strong> the hearing.<br />

However, the default position can be reversed in certain cases. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

regulators have a broad provision that hearings can be held in private where this<br />

is in the interests <strong>of</strong> any person, or the person concerned <strong>and</strong> any third party. At<br />

other regulators the Panels are required to consider matters <strong>of</strong> principle such as<br />

whether the circumstances <strong>of</strong> the case outweigh the public interest <strong>of</strong> a public<br />

hearing, or whether the interests <strong>of</strong> justice dem<strong>and</strong> a private hearing. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

the rules require that before holding a private hearing the Panel must invite<br />

representations from parties <strong>and</strong>/or obtain advice from the legal adviser.<br />

9.52 Most <strong>of</strong> the regulators have rules which specify that health cases must be in<br />

private except if a public hearing is appropriate or in other cases similar to those<br />

described above. Some fitness to practise rules also extend to interim order<br />

cases the default position <strong>of</strong> a private hearing.<br />

Location <strong>of</strong> hearings<br />

9.53 Most regulators have discretion about where Panel hearings can take place.<br />

However, the <strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Council is required to hold hearings in the UK<br />

country in which the registrant is situated or resides. 44<br />

Vulnerable witnesses<br />

9.54 Where a person is classified as being a “vulnerable witness”, special measures<br />

can be introduced to assist the giving <strong>of</strong> evidence. Most regulators’ rules define<br />

who is a vulnerable witness by reference to whether the person has a mental<br />

disorder, impaired intelligence or physical disabilities, the allegations are <strong>of</strong> a<br />

sexual nature or the witness has been intimidated. Some regulators are required<br />

to treat any witness under 18 as being a vulnerable witness, whilst for others the<br />

age is under 17. At the General Chiropractic Council <strong>and</strong> General Osteopathic<br />

Council there are no express provisions for vulnerable witnesses.<br />

42<br />

Council for the <strong>Regulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>care Pr<strong>of</strong>essionals v General Medical Council [2006]<br />

EWHC 464 (Admin).<br />

43<br />

Re B [2008] UKHL 35 at [13] to [16] <strong>and</strong> [69] to [73] <strong>and</strong> Re Doherty [2008] UKHL 33 at<br />

[27] to [29] <strong>and</strong> [44] to 52].<br />

44 <strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>essions Order 2001, SI 2002 No 254, art 22(7).<br />

170

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!