15.08.2013 Views

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

Regulation of Health and Social Care Professionals Consultation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

attach to systemic failures to implement a Directive. 11 A similar approach is taken<br />

to state liability to the European Commission <strong>and</strong> other Member States, whereby<br />

only a systemic failure to transpose a Directive would attract liability. 12<br />

Furthermore, in the unlikely event that liability was found, the Government is able<br />

to require the regulators to contribute to any fines which were imposed. 13<br />

13.16 Nonetheless we accept that it is important for the Government to have powers to<br />

intervene at an early stage to avoid any failures. The effects <strong>of</strong> litigation, in which<br />

the Government would be enjoined, are likely to be damaging to international<br />

relations <strong>and</strong> resource intensive. We therefore propose that the default powers <strong>of</strong><br />

the Government (see Part 2) should include the ability to intervene in cases<br />

where there is likely to be or has been a failure to implement the Directive<br />

properly.<br />

Provisional Proposal 13-1: The statute should require the regulators to specify<br />

in rules which qualifications would entitle an applicant to be registered,<br />

including overseas qualifications.<br />

Provisional Proposal 13-2: The default powers <strong>of</strong> the Government should<br />

include the ability to intervene in cases where there is likely to be or has been<br />

a failure to implement the Qualifications Directive properly.<br />

REGISTRANTS ENTERING FROM BEYOND THE EEA<br />

13.17 <strong>Health</strong> <strong>and</strong> social care pr<strong>of</strong>essionals entering the UK from beyond the EEA give<br />

rise to issues similar to those addressed above, although their resolution is<br />

different. These differences arise primarily from a less detailed legal framework to<br />

allow for the recognition <strong>of</strong> qualifications. The main issue for the regulators is<br />

whether an individual satisfies the requirements for registration, which involves<br />

determining whether foreign qualifications can be taken as equivalent to UK<br />

qualifications. Non-EEA applicants are <strong>of</strong>ten required to undertake some form <strong>of</strong><br />

assessment.<br />

13.18 Most <strong>of</strong> the other regulators follow a similar framework <strong>of</strong> assessing individual<br />

applicants <strong>and</strong> then requiring some form <strong>of</strong> additional training to introduce the<br />

applicant to practise in the UK. For instance, at the Nursing <strong>and</strong> Midwifery<br />

Council a non-EEA applicant must supply evidence <strong>of</strong> personal details such as<br />

passport <strong>and</strong> birth certificate, as well as references from employers <strong>and</strong><br />

transcripts <strong>of</strong> training forms. There are language, practice <strong>and</strong> education<br />

requirements as well as specific requirements for both nurses <strong>and</strong> midwives. If an<br />

applicant then satisfies these requirements, they must then take a supplementary<br />

course such as the Overseas Nurses Programme or the Adaptation to Midwifery<br />

11 See particularly, Joined Cases C-46/93 <strong>and</strong> C-48/93 Brasserie du Pêcheur SA v Federal<br />

Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany; R v Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for Transport ex parte Factortame Limited<br />

[1996] I-1131; Carswell v The Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for Transport, The Motor Insurers' Bureau<br />

[2010] EWHC 3230 (QB); <strong>and</strong> Negassi v Secretary <strong>of</strong> State for the Home Department<br />

[2011] EWHC 386 (Admin) at para 25.<br />

12 For example, see Commission <strong>of</strong> the European Communities v Germany (29/84) [1985]<br />

E.C.R. 1661 <strong>and</strong> Commission <strong>of</strong> the European Communities v UK (556/08).<br />

13 Localism Act 2011, ss 48 to 57.<br />

226

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!