Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

116 Karsai, I., K. Meszaros, L. Lang, P.M. Hayes, and Z. Bedo. 2001. Multivariate analysis of traits determining adaptation in cultivated barley. Plant Breeding 120:217-222. Marquez-Cedillo, L.A., P.M. Hayes, A. Kleinhofs, W.G. Legge, B.G. Rossnagel, K. Sato, S.E. Ullrich, D.M. Wesenberg, and the NABGMP. 2001. QTL analysis of agronomic traits in barley based on the doubled haploid progeny of two elite North American varieties representing different germplasm groups. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:625-637. Costa, J.M., S. Kramer, C. Jobet, R. Wolfe, A. Kleinhofs, D. Kudrna, A. Corey, S. McCoy, O. Riera-Lizarazu, K. Sato, T. Toojinda, I. Vales, P. Szucs, and P. M. Hayes. 2001. Molecular mapping of the Oregon Wolfe Barleys: an exceptionally polymorphic doubled-haploid population. Theor. Appl. Genet.103:415-424. Germplasm registrations Wesenberg, D.M.., D.E. Burrup, W.M. Brown, V.R. Velasco, J.P. Hill, J.C. Whitmore, R.S. Karow, P.M. Hayes, S.E. Ullrich, and C.T. Liu. 2001. Registration of Bancroft barley. Crop Sci. 41:265-266. Book Chapters P.M. Hayes, A. Castro, L. Marquez-Cedillo, A. Corey, C. Henson, B.L. Jones, J. Kling, D. Mather, I. Matus, C. Rossi, and K. Sato. Genetic Diversity for Quantitatively Inherited Agronomic and Malting Quality Traits. In R. Von Bothmer, H. Knupffer, T. van Hintum, and K. Sato (ed.). Diversity in Barley. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. in press Table 1. Agronomic data for Oregon winter barley selections compared to check varieties, averaged across three locations (Pendleton, Pullman, and Aberdeen; 2001). Yield Test weight Plump seed Variety/selection (lbs/acre) (lbs/bu) (on 6/64) 88Ab536 5366 51 78 Strider 6912 50 82 Hundred 6132 48 49 812 6474 50 74 STAB 7 5439 51 68 STAB 47 5053 51 83 STAB 113 5752 52 80 KAB37 6068 51 68 KAB47 4988 50 67 KAB51 5473 52 85
117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Oregon winter barley selections compared to check varieties, averaged across three locations (Pendleton, Pullman, and Aberdeen; 2000 - 2001). Yield Test weight Plump seed Variety/selection (lbs/acre) (lbs/bu) (on 6/64) 88Ab536 5278 52 82 Strider 7408 51 88 Hundred 6666 50 61 812 6756 51 80 STAB 7 5920 52 76 STAB 47 5187 52 87 STAB 113 6419 53 79 KAB37 6668 53 76 KAB47 5532 52 74 KAB51 5686 53 89 Table 3. Agronomic data for Oregon winter barley selections compared to check varieties (2001). Yield Test weight Plump seed Location /Year Variety/selection (lbs/acre) (lbs/bu) (on 6/64) Pendleton 2001 88Ab536 4483 49 61 Strider 6811 48 78 Hundred 6341 49 35 812 5785 49 61 STAB 7 5532 49 56 STAB 47 5384 52 81 STAB 113 5453 52 75 KAB37 6007 51 61 KAB47 5728 49 50 KAB51 4998 52 86 Pullman 2001 88Ab536 4761 50 83 Strider 6638 48 86 Hundred 5353 43 51 812 6040 48 78 STAB 7 5136 49 75 STAB 47 4342 49 87 STAB 113 5756 50 85 KAB37 5454 49 70 KAB47 5261 50 78 KAB51 5190 49 91 Aberdeen 2001 88Ab536 6854 54 91 Strider 7286 54 83 Hundred 6701 52 61 812 7598 53 82 STAB 7 5650 54 74 STAB 47 5424 53 82 STAB 113 6048 54 79 KAB37 6744 54 73 KAB47 3947 51 73 KAB51 6230 54 77
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
Page 6 and 7:
Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
Page 9 and 10:
1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
Page 11 and 12:
3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
Page 13 and 14:
5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
Page 15 and 16:
7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
Page 17 and 18:
9 This project is supported by the
Page 19 and 20:
11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
Page 21 and 22:
13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
Page 23 and 24:
15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
Page 25 and 26:
17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
Page 27 and 28:
19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
Page 29 and 30:
21 Table 14. Agronomic data for sel
Page 31 and 32:
23 Table 16. Agronomic data for win
Page 33 and 34:
25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
Page 35 and 36:
Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
Page 37 and 38:
29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
Page 39 and 40:
31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
Page 41 and 42:
33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
Page 43 and 44:
35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 45 and 46:
37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
Page 47 and 48:
39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
Page 49 and 50:
41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
Page 51 and 52:
43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
Page 53 and 54:
45 assessments were made by countin
Page 55 and 56:
47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE
Page 57 and 58:
49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
Page 59 and 60:
51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
Page 61 and 62:
53 We have available the sugarcane
Page 63 and 64:
55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
Page 65 and 66:
57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
Page 67 and 68:
59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
Page 69 and 70:
61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
Page 71 and 72:
63 performance for Montana farmers.
Page 73 and 74: 65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D.
Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
Page 79 and 80: 71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
Page 83 and 84: 75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
Page 85 and 86: 77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 87 and 88: 79 this variety has decreased over
Page 89 and 90: Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
Page 91 and 92: 83 • Management studies for malt
Page 93 and 94: 85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
Page 95 and 96: 87 With funding from the US Wheat a
Page 97 and 98: 89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF B
Page 99 and 100: 91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
Page 101 and 102: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
Page 103 and 104: 95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
Page 105 and 106: 97 Results Results from field and g
Page 107 and 108: 99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
Page 109 and 110: 101 trials of plants regenerated fr
Page 111 and 112: 103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
Page 113 and 114: 105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
Page 115 and 116: 107 involving two susceptible backg
Page 117 and 118: 109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
Page 119 and 120: 111 for traits that are difficult/e
Page 121 and 122: Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
Page 123: 115 • All lines in spring yield t
Page 127 and 128: 119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
Page 129 and 130: 121 Table 7. Across location summar
Page 131 and 132: 123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
Page 133 and 134: 125
Page 135 and 136: 127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
Page 137 and 138: 129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
Page 139 and 140: 131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
Page 141 and 142: 133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
Page 143 and 144: 135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
Page 145 and 146: 137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
Page 147 and 148: 139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
Page 149 and 150: 141 modification measures indicated
Page 151 and 152: 143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
Page 153 and 154: 145 Purification of a serine endope
Page 155 and 156: 147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
Page 157 and 158: 149 with the proteinase T will be s
Page 159 and 160: 151 10°C increase in thermostabili
Page 161 and 162: 153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
Page 163 and 164: µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
Page 165 and 166: 157 Tissue-specific gene products f
Page 167 and 168: 159 The promoters were subcloned fr
Page 169: 161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?