Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

88 Publications: (generated by previous project members while supported by AMBA) Edwards, MC; Fetch, TG; Schwarz, PB; Steffenson, BJ 2001 Effect of Barley yellow dwarf virus infection on yield and malting quality of barley. PLANT-DISEASE. 85: 202- 207. Schwarz, PB; Schwarz. JG; Zhou, A; Prom, LK; Steffenson, BJ 2001 Effect of Fusarium graminearum and F. poae infection on barley and malt quality. MONATSSCHRIFT- FUR-BRAUWISSENSCHAFT. 54: 55-63. Zhong, SB; Steffenson, BJ 2001 Genetic and molecular characterization of mating type genes in Cochliobolus sativus. MYCOLOGIA. 93: 852-863. Zhong, SB; Steffenson, BJ 2001 Virulence and molecular diversity in Cochliobolus sativus. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 91: 469-476.
89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF BARLEY Paul Schwarz Department of Cereal Science North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105 OBJECTIVES AND JUSTIFICATION A primary objective of the barley quality program at North Dakota State University is to provide individuals in the barley improvement program with barley and malt quality data that is required for the development and release of acceptable malting varieties. Prediction tests are performed on early generation lines to aid in selection for improved malting quality. Micro-malting and malt quality analyses are performed on materials from barley genetics studies and other special cooperative projects. Basic research efforts are directed toward the biochemical components of barley and malt, in order to aid in the understanding and definition of malt quality. A survey of the regional barley crop is conducted on an annual basis. This information is provided to the sponsors in the form of weekly and annual reports. BARLEY VARIETY DEVELOPMENT 1. Early Generation Quality Testing Program. Approximately 3,125 early generation two- and six-rowed lines and cultivars, grown in 2001, were submitted for preliminary screening by near infrared reflectance (NIR) for protein. The potential diastatic power of 1,135 of the breeder’s lines were analyzed. An additional 1,300-1,750 six-rowed samples were screened for kernel assortment, test weight and/or color. Lines and varieties (120) from the 2001 NDSU variety plot trials were micro-malted and are awaiting analysis for standard quality parameters. 2. Deoxynivalenol Testing Program. The overall goal of the DON testing program in Cereal Science is to expedite the development of scab resistant malting barley cultivars for the upper Midwest. DON analysis services are provided to barley breeders and pathologists at NDSU, University of Minnesota, and Busch Agricultural Resources, Inc. The service is provided to all cooperators at a minimal charge, which includes only the cost of expendable supplies, chemicals, and sample grinding labor. Approximately 7,500 barley samples from the 2001 crop were analyzed for DON by gas chromatography with electron capture detection (GC-ECD) (Table I). Samples included breeder’s lines, crop survey samples, and samples from research studies. This is 2,500 more samples than analyzed in 2000, and does not include the analysis of 1,350 standards. The 2001 crop samples were analyzed beginning September 1, 2001 and are to complete in March, 2002. A barley DON check sample service is operated as a service to 13 academic and industry labs. Two samples are shipped to each participant on a monthly basis. Results of this check service have indicated that precision of DON analysis in our laboratory improved during 2001. While our results average slightly below the grand mean, the standard deviation was the lowest of any of the 13 participating laboratories.
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
Page 6 and 7:
Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
Page 9 and 10:
1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
Page 11 and 12:
3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
Page 13 and 14:
5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
Page 15 and 16:
7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
Page 17 and 18:
9 This project is supported by the
Page 19 and 20:
11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
Page 21 and 22:
13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
Page 23 and 24:
15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
Page 25 and 26:
17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
Page 27 and 28:
19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
Page 29 and 30:
21 Table 14. Agronomic data for sel
Page 31 and 32:
23 Table 16. Agronomic data for win
Page 33 and 34:
25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
Page 35 and 36:
Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
Page 37 and 38:
29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
Page 39 and 40:
31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
Page 41 and 42:
33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
Page 43 and 44:
35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 45 and 46: 37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
Page 47 and 48: 39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
Page 49 and 50: 41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
Page 51 and 52: 43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
Page 53 and 54: 45 assessments were made by countin
Page 55 and 56: 47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE
Page 57 and 58: 49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
Page 59 and 60: 51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
Page 61 and 62: 53 We have available the sugarcane
Page 63 and 64: 55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
Page 65 and 66: 57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
Page 67 and 68: 59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
Page 69 and 70: 61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
Page 71 and 72: 63 performance for Montana farmers.
Page 73 and 74: 65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D.
Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
Page 79 and 80: 71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
Page 83 and 84: 75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
Page 85 and 86: 77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 87 and 88: 79 this variety has decreased over
Page 89 and 90: Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
Page 91 and 92: 83 • Management studies for malt
Page 93 and 94: 85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
Page 95: 87 With funding from the US Wheat a
Page 99 and 100: 91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
Page 101 and 102: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
Page 103 and 104: 95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
Page 105 and 106: 97 Results Results from field and g
Page 107 and 108: 99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
Page 109 and 110: 101 trials of plants regenerated fr
Page 111 and 112: 103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
Page 113 and 114: 105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
Page 115 and 116: 107 involving two susceptible backg
Page 117 and 118: 109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
Page 119 and 120: 111 for traits that are difficult/e
Page 121 and 122: Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
Page 123 and 124: 115 • All lines in spring yield t
Page 125 and 126: 117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Ore
Page 127 and 128: 119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
Page 129 and 130: 121 Table 7. Across location summar
Page 131 and 132: 123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
Page 133 and 134: 125
Page 135 and 136: 127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
Page 137 and 138: 129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
Page 139 and 140: 131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
Page 141 and 142: 133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
Page 143 and 144: 135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
Page 145 and 146: 137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
Page 147 and 148:
139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
Page 149 and 150:
141 modification measures indicated
Page 151 and 152:
143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
Page 153 and 154:
145 Purification of a serine endope
Page 155 and 156:
147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
Page 157 and 158:
149 with the proteinase T will be s
Page 159 and 160:
151 10°C increase in thermostabili
Page 161 and 162:
153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
Page 163 and 164:
µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
Page 165 and 166:
157 Tissue-specific gene products f
Page 167 and 168:
159 The promoters were subcloned fr
Page 169:
161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?