Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

20 Table 12. Agronomic data for selected six-rowed varieties and selections grown in trial B on dryland at Tetonia, Idaho, 1999-2001. Test Plump Heading Yield (bu/A) Weight* Barley* Date* Entry 1999 2000 2001 Average (lbs/bu) (%) (Julian) No. Trials 3 1 1 1 Legacy 78.4 57.7 63.1 66.4 50.2 87 189 Steptoe 81.4 58.6 71.9 70.6 49.0 97 185 UT4087 92.0 71.1 84.2 82.4 51.7 95 188 UT5828 76.8 54.6 71.2 67.5 48.5 86 185 6B95-2482 ---- 57.9 65.3 ---- 50.3 90 190 93Ab688 77.2 59.5 76.7 71.1 50.5 94 186 *2001 data only. Table 13. Agronomic summary of varieties and selections grown in the Mississippi Valley Barley Nursery under irrigation at Aberdeen, Idaho, 1999-2001. Test Plump Heading Yield Weight Barley Date Height Lodging Protein Oil Entry (bu/A) (lbs/bu) (%) (Julian) (in) (%) (%) (%) No. Trials 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 6B95-2482 161.0 54.7 96 172 37 9 12.9 2.2 6B96-3733 172.4 54.4 98 173 40 18 12.1 2.3 Barbless 112.4 48.9 80 181 41 58 14.3 2.3 Colter 177.9 51.8 88 171 36 6 9.6 2.2 Drummond 162.4 53.9 96 172 39 12 12.4 2.1 Foster 173.0 52.8 95 172 38 11 12.5 2.1 Lacey 165.6 53.9 95 171 38 20 11.6 2.1 Larker 138.5 52.2 88 172 39 47 12.5 2.2 Legacy 153.7 53.4 90 174 39 43 12.2 2.0 M103 170.9 53.6 97 172 38 25 12.5 2.2 M104 174.4 53.6 95 171 35 11 11.7 2.1 MNBrite 144.4 53.6 94 173 41 34 14.4 2.1 Morex 131.4 51.8 88 171 40 53 13.2 2.2 ND16301 169.1 53.2 98 172 37 2 11.0 2.4 Robust 144.7 53.7 92 173 41 27 13.1 2.1 Stander 158.6 53.6 92 174 39 24 12.7 2.2
21 Table 14. Agronomic data for selected six-rowed varieties and selections grown under irrigation at Aberdeen, Idaho, 2000-01. Test Plump Heading Yield Weight Barley Date Height Lodging Entry (bu/A) (lbs/bu) (%) (Julian) (in) (%) No. Trials 2 2 2 2 2 2 93Ab688 178.9 52.9 90 169 37 41 94Ab13449 171.0 54.0 94 167 35 11 98Ab12905 173.4 54.0 92 167 36 35 Colter 192.2 52.8 91 168 36 13 Drummond 150.3 52.8 96 170 38 8 Foster 161.5 52.9 97 168 38 19 Legacy 156.8 53.7 95 170 39 53 Millenium 194.6 51.7 90 165 33 0 Nebula 168.1 53.2 97 173 28 2 Stander 160.1 54.0 95 169 37 9 Steptoe 162.2 51.4 94 168 36 48 Table 15. Malting quality data* for selected six-rowed barley varieties and selections grown in two irrigated trials at Aberdeen, Idaho, 1999-2000. Plump Malt Barley Wort Alpha- Beta Variety or Barley Extract Protein Protein S/T DP amylase glucan Selection (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (°ASBC) (20°DU) (ppm) B 2601 90 80.1 12.4 4.97 41.7 129 60.5 414 Colter 92 81.0 10.1 5.24 53.5 90 49.6 332 Foster 97 79.1 12.5 4.95 40.7 140 60.3 368 Sisler 87 79.8 12.7 4.98 39.9 163 70.2 333 Stander 94 79.8 12.7 6.11 50.0 140 65.9 343 92Ab5180 90 79.9 11.3 4.58 42.6 127 55.6 268 94Ab13449 95 81.9 10.8 4.72 44.6 102 53.3 163 96Ab10452 97 80.2 13.5 5.40 41.1 127 65.6 376 96Ab10468 91 80.1 10.8 5.01 49.5 109 43.2 400 97Ab8333 93 81.2 11.0 4.50 42.6 109 55.1 269 98Ab12362 97 80.2 12.8 5.17 41.8 156 58.2 242 98Ab12904 92 80.1 12.1 4.58 38.3 108 54.3 333 98Ab12905 95 82.6 11.0 5.31 51.6 76 73.3 425 * Malting quality data courtesy of USDA-ARS Cereal Crops Research Unit, Madison Wisconsin.
Page 1 and 2: Annual Pro
Page 3: -i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
Page 6 and 7: Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
Page 9 and 10: 1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
Page 11 and 12: 3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
Page 13 and 14: 5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
Page 15 and 16: 7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
Page 17 and 18: 9 This project is supported by the
Page 19 and 20: 11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
Page 21 and 22: 13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
Page 23 and 24: 15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
Page 25 and 26: 17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
Page 27: 19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
Page 31 and 32: 23 Table 16. Agronomic data for win
Page 33 and 34: 25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
Page 35 and 36: Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
Page 37 and 38: 29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
Page 39 and 40: 31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
Page 41 and 42: 33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
Page 43 and 44: 35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 45 and 46: 37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
Page 47 and 48: 39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
Page 49 and 50: 41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
Page 51 and 52: 43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
Page 53 and 54: 45 assessments were made by countin
Page 55 and 56: 47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE
Page 57 and 58: 49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
Page 59 and 60: 51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
Page 61 and 62: 53 We have available the sugarcane
Page 63 and 64: 55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
Page 65 and 66: 57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
Page 67 and 68: 59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
Page 69 and 70: 61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
Page 71 and 72: 63 performance for Montana farmers.
Page 73 and 74: 65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D.
Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
Page 79 and 80:
71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 81 and 82:
Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
Page 83 and 84:
75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
Page 85 and 86:
77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 87 and 88:
79 this variety has decreased over
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
Page 91 and 92:
83 • Management studies for malt
Page 93 and 94:
85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
Page 95 and 96:
87 With funding from the US Wheat a
Page 97 and 98:
89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF B
Page 99 and 100:
91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
Page 101 and 102:
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
Page 103 and 104:
95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
Page 105 and 106:
97 Results Results from field and g
Page 107 and 108:
99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
Page 109 and 110:
101 trials of plants regenerated fr
Page 111 and 112:
103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
Page 113 and 114:
105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
Page 115 and 116:
107 involving two susceptible backg
Page 117 and 118:
109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
Page 119 and 120:
111 for traits that are difficult/e
Page 121 and 122:
Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
Page 123 and 124:
115 • All lines in spring yield t
Page 125 and 126:
117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Ore
Page 127 and 128:
119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
Page 129 and 130:
121 Table 7. Across location summar
Page 131 and 132:
123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
Page 133 and 134:
125
Page 135 and 136:
127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
Page 137 and 138:
129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
Page 139 and 140:
131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
Page 141 and 142:
133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
Page 143 and 144:
135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
Page 145 and 146:
137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
Page 147 and 148:
139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
Page 149 and 150:
141 modification measures indicated
Page 151 and 152:
143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
Page 153 and 154:
145 Purification of a serine endope
Page 155 and 156:
147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
Page 157 and 158:
149 with the proteinase T will be s
Page 159 and 160:
151 10°C increase in thermostabili
Page 161 and 162:
153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
Page 163 and 164:
µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
Page 165 and 166:
157 Tissue-specific gene products f
Page 167 and 168:
159 The promoters were subcloned fr
Page 169:
161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?