16.08.2013 Views

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

140<br />

Table 1. A comparis<strong>on</strong> of the malting quality of barley samples germinated with 0% or<br />

100% air recirculati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Fine<br />

Wort<br />

Variety or Percent Moisture Extract Wort Wort Protein S/T DP<br />

AlphaBetaamylaseglucan Quality<br />

Selecti<strong>on</strong> recirc'n adjusted (%) Color Clarity (%) (%) (ASBC) (20ºDU) (ppm) Score<br />

C<strong>on</strong>l<strong>on</strong> 0 OS,d1,d2 81.6 1.8 1 5.37 49.1 88 71.9 93 39<br />

C<strong>on</strong>l<strong>on</strong> 100 OS,d1,d2 81.7 1.6 1 5.29 47.5 97 76.1 86 43<br />

Robust 0 OS,d1,d2 78.7 2 1 6.17 47.3 147 57.1 196 27<br />

Robust 100 OS,d1,d2 78.6 1.9 1 6.17 47.3 155 56 195 32<br />

Harringt<strong>on</strong> 0 OS,d1,d2 81.6 1.4 1 5.22 47.1 87 66.6 94 32<br />

Harringt<strong>on</strong> 100 OS,d1,d2 81.4 1.3 1 5.16 45 97 68.1 88 41<br />

Morex 0 OS,d1,d2 80.5 2.4 1 6.15 53.1 104 66.6 109 36<br />

Morex 100 OS,d1,d2 80.2 1.9 1 6.23 54.2 131 73 83 40<br />

Only the Diastatic Power values varied when the air flow was altered. The levels<br />

increased markedly when the air flow was raised to 100%. Varying the air had no effect<br />

<strong>on</strong> the moisture retenti<strong>on</strong> of the barley samples. Other than the DP values, the amount<br />

of air recirculati<strong>on</strong> during germinati<strong>on</strong> had little effect <strong>on</strong> the finished malt quality.<br />

The effect of moisture levels during germinati<strong>on</strong>. The quality of malts prepared in<br />

the JW micromalting units is affected by moisture fluctuati<strong>on</strong>s, and especially by<br />

desiccati<strong>on</strong>, during malting. It is thus important to m<strong>on</strong>itor the moisture levels of the<br />

barley during germinati<strong>on</strong> and to understand how moisture changes that occur<br />

throughout the malting process affect the quality of the finished malt. An investigati<strong>on</strong><br />

of how the out-of-steep (O-S) and germinati<strong>on</strong> moisture levels affected the malt quality<br />

has been carried out. The moisture levels of Harringt<strong>on</strong> barley samples were adjusted at<br />

O-S, and every 24 hours afterwards, until germinati<strong>on</strong> was completed. The quality<br />

values of the resulting malts are displayed in Table 2.<br />

Table 2. The effect of germinati<strong>on</strong> moisture levels <strong>on</strong> Harringt<strong>on</strong> malt quality<br />

parameters.<br />

Wort<br />

Protein<br />

Alphaamylase <br />

Betaglucan<br />

(ppm) FAN<br />

Fine Coarse<br />

S/T DP<br />

Moisture Extract Extract F-C (%) (%) (ASBC) (20ºDU)<br />

43% 81.0 79.0 2.0 5.37 48.7 89 63 296 218<br />

44% 81.3 79.1 2.2 5.47 50.2 84 68 314 215<br />

45% 81.2 79.4 1.8 5.47 49.0 85 64 256 212<br />

46% 81.3 79.8 1.5 5.66 50.7 98 72 108 222<br />

Statistical tests revealed that the Fine Grind Extract and Wort Clarity parameters were the<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>es that were not affected by the germinati<strong>on</strong> moisture level. All of the other grain

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!