See, D., Kanazin V., Talbert H., Blake T. 2000. An Electrophoretic Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Detecti<strong>on</strong> System. Biotechniques 28:710-716. 64 Blackhurst, T. C., J.G.P. Bowman, L.M.M. Surber, T. K. Daniels, and T. K. Blake. 2000. Improving the feed value of barley for finishing steers. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 51:30-33. Surber, L.M.M., J.G.P. Bowman, T. K. Blake, D. D. Hinman, D. L. Boss, and T. C. Blackhurst. 2000. Predicti<strong>on</strong> of barley feed quality for beef cattle from laboratory analyses. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 51:295-298. Surber, L.M.M., J.G.P. Bowman, T. K. Blake, V. E. Nettles, A. L. Grindeland, M. T. Stowe, R. L. Endecott, K. N. Robins<strong>on</strong>, B. L. Robins<strong>on</strong>, and D. R. See. 2000. Determinati<strong>on</strong> of genetic markers associated with forage quality of barley for beef cattle. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 51:454-457. Bowman JGP, Blake TK, Surber LMM, Habernicht DK, and Bockleman H. 2001. Feed- Quality Variati<strong>on</strong> in the <strong>Barley</strong> Corel Collecti<strong>on</strong> of the USDA Nati<strong>on</strong>al Small Grains Collecti<strong>on</strong>. Crop Sci. 41:863-870. Surber LMM, Stowe MT, Bowman JGP, Cash SD, Hensleigh PF, and Blake TK. 2001. Variati<strong>on</strong> in forage quality characteristics of barley. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52: 353-356. Surber LMM, Bowman JGP, Blake TK, Robis<strong>on</strong> DN, Endecott RL, and Robis<strong>on</strong> BL. 2001. Identificati<strong>on</strong> of genetic markers associated with forage quality characteristics in Lewis x Karl barley lines. Proc. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52: 292-295. Endecott, R. L., J.G.P. Bowman, L.M.M. Surber, D. L. Boss, K. N. Robis<strong>on</strong>, and T. K. Blake. 2001. Feeding value of Lewis and Bar<strong>on</strong>esse barley lines for finishing steers. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52:551-554. Kincheloe, J. J., J.G.P. Bowman, L.M.M. Surber, K. A. Anders<strong>on</strong>, K. N. Robis<strong>on</strong>, R. L. Endecott, B. L. Robins<strong>on</strong>, and T. K. Blake. 2001. Feeding value of Morex, Steptoe, and two experimental backcross barley lines for finishing steers. West. Sec. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52:555-558. Sherman JD, Smith LY, Blake TK, Talbert LE. 2001. Identificati<strong>on</strong> of barley genome segments introgressed into wheat using PCR markers. Genome 44: 1-7. Beecher B, Smidansky ED, See D, Blake TK Giroux MJ. 2001. Mapping and sequence analysis of barley hordoindolines. Theor. Appl. Genet. 102:833-840. Kanazin, V. Talbert H., See, D., Blake T. in press. Discovery and Manipulati<strong>on</strong> of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in <strong>Barley</strong>. Plant Mol. Biol. <strong>March</strong> <strong>2002</strong>. See D. Kanazin V. Kephart K., Blake T. in press. Mapping genes c<strong>on</strong>trolling variati<strong>on</strong> in barley grain protein c<strong>on</strong>tent. Crop Science. May <strong>2002</strong>. Blake, T. Bowman, J. Hensleigh P., Boss D., Carls<strong>on</strong> G., Kushnak G., Eckhoff J. submitted. Release of ‘Valier’ <strong>Barley</strong>. Crop Science. Accepted for publicati<strong>on</strong> 11/01.
65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D., Carls<strong>on</strong> G., Kushnak G., Eckhoff J. submitted. Release of ‘H3860224’ <strong>Barley</strong>. Crop Science. Accepted for publicati<strong>on</strong> 11/01. Beecher B, Bowman J, Martin J, Bettge A, Morris CF, Blake TK and Giroux MJ. submitted. Hordoindolines are associated with a major endosperm texture QTL in <strong>Barley</strong> (Hordeum vulgare L.). Genome. Accepted for publicati<strong>on</strong> 1/02. Fischer, AM, Meyer, FD, Garmenr JP, and Blake TK. submitted. Mapping of QTLs associated with nitrogen storage and remobilizati<strong>on</strong> in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) leaves. J. Expt. Bot. In review.
- Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
- Page 3:
-i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
- Page 6 and 7:
Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
- Page 9 and 10:
1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
- Page 11 and 12:
3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
- Page 13 and 14:
5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
- Page 15 and 16:
7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
- Page 17 and 18:
9 This project is supported by the
- Page 19 and 20:
11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
- Page 21 and 22: 13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
- Page 23 and 24: 15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
- Page 25 and 26: 17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
- Page 27 and 28: 19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
- Page 29 and 30: 21 Table 14. Agronomic data for sel
- Page 31 and 32: 23 Table 16. Agronomic data for win
- Page 33 and 34: 25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
- Page 35 and 36: Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
- Page 37 and 38: 29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
- Page 39 and 40: 31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
- Page 41 and 42: 33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
- Page 43 and 44: 35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
- Page 45 and 46: 37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
- Page 47 and 48: 39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
- Page 49 and 50: 41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
- Page 51 and 52: 43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
- Page 53 and 54: 45 assessments were made by countin
- Page 55 and 56: 47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE
- Page 57 and 58: 49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
- Page 59 and 60: 51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
- Page 61 and 62: 53 We have available the sugarcane
- Page 63 and 64: 55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
- Page 65 and 66: 57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
- Page 67 and 68: 59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
- Page 69 and 70: 61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
- Page 71: 63 performance for Montana farmers.
- Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
- Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
- Page 79 and 80: 71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
- Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
- Page 83 and 84: 75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
- Page 85 and 86: 77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
- Page 87 and 88: 79 this variety has decreased over
- Page 89 and 90: Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
- Page 91 and 92: 83 • Management studies for malt
- Page 93 and 94: 85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
- Page 95 and 96: 87 With funding from the US Wheat a
- Page 97 and 98: 89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF B
- Page 99 and 100: 91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
- Page 101 and 102: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
- Page 103 and 104: 95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
- Page 105 and 106: 97 Results Results from field and g
- Page 107 and 108: 99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
- Page 109 and 110: 101 trials of plants regenerated fr
- Page 111 and 112: 103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
- Page 113 and 114: 105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
- Page 115 and 116: 107 involving two susceptible backg
- Page 117 and 118: 109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
- Page 119 and 120: 111 for traits that are difficult/e
- Page 121 and 122: Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
- Page 123 and 124:
115 • All lines in spring yield t
- Page 125 and 126:
117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Ore
- Page 127 and 128:
119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
- Page 129 and 130:
121 Table 7. Across location summar
- Page 131 and 132:
123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
- Page 133 and 134:
125
- Page 135 and 136:
127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
- Page 137 and 138:
129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
- Page 139 and 140:
131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
- Page 141 and 142:
133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
- Page 143 and 144:
135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
- Page 145 and 146:
137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
- Page 147 and 148:
139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
- Page 149 and 150:
141 modification measures indicated
- Page 151 and 152:
143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
- Page 153 and 154:
145 Purification of a serine endope
- Page 155 and 156:
147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
- Page 157 and 158:
149 with the proteinase T will be s
- Page 159 and 160:
151 10°C increase in thermostabili
- Page 161 and 162:
153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
- Page 163 and 164:
µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
- Page 165 and 166:
157 Tissue-specific gene products f
- Page 167 and 168:
159 The promoters were subcloned fr
- Page 169:
161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f