Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

46 Morris. Greenhouse tests for resistance to net blotch, powdery mildew, and loose smut were also conducted. Publications Dill-Macky, R., and Salas, B. (2001). Effect of burning wheat and barley residues on the survival of Fusarium graminearum and Cochliobolus sativus. In: Proceedings of the 2001 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Erlanger, Kentucky, USA, December 8-10, 2001, p. 112. Dill-Macky, R., Evans, C.K., and Culler, M.D. (2001). Manipulating artificial epidemics of Fusarium head blight in wheat with inoculum concentration. In: Proceedings of the 2001 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Erlanger, Kentucky, USA, December 8-10, 2001, p. 113. Evans, C.K., and Dill-Macky, R. (2001). Influence of mist-irrigation on Fusarium head blight and seed characteristics of wheat and barley. In: Proceedings of the 2001 National Fusarium Head Blight Forum, Erlanger, Kentucky, USA, December 8-10, 2001, p. 234. Dill-Macky, R., and Salas, B. (2001). Effect of burning wheat and barley residues on the survival of Fusarium graminearum and Cochliobolus sativus. Phytopathology, 91:S23. Evans, C.K., and Dill-Macky, R. (2001). Influence of mist-irrigation on Fusarium head blight and seed characteristics of wheat and barley. Phytopathology, 91:S27. Personnel Ruth Dill-Macky, Associate Professor, Project Leader C. Kent Evans, Research Associate Bacilio Salas, Research Associate Amar M. Elakkad, Research Plot Technician Christine C. Newby, Junior Laboratory Technician Karen J. Wennberg, Assistant Scientist Cooperators Kevin P. Smith and Gary J. Muehlbauer - Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108 Roger K. Jones and Brian J. Steffenson - Department of Plant Pathology, University of Minnesota, St Paul MN 55108 John V. Wiersma - Northwest Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Crookston, MN 56716 George A. Nelson - West Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Morris, MN 56267
47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE RESISTANCE GENES FOR BARLEY Brian J. Steffenson Department of Plant Pathology University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 OBJECTIVES The primary mission of the Cereal Disease Resistance Project at the University of Minnesota is the control of economically important barley (Hordeum vulgare) diseases. For many diseases, this goal is best achieved through the development of cultivars with genetic resistance. Wild barley species are rich sources of disease resistance genes for cultivated barley. Thus, one of the main objectives of this research is to evaluate selected accessions of H. vulgare subsp. spontaneum (wild barley) and H. bulbosum (bulbous barley grass) for resistance to the major diseases in the Upper Midwest. Ancillary objectives related to this project and Upper Midwest barley breeding programs include, surveying commercial barley fields for diseases in Minnesota; collecting pathogen isolates from infected barley cultivars and assessing their virulence; and increasing and maintaining pathogen stocks for testing breeding lines and wild species for resistance. Evaluation of Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum accessions for disease resistance. A total of 391 H. v. subsp. spontaneum accessions collected across the Fertile Crescent were evaluated to Fusarium head blight (FHB) (caused by Fusarium graminearum) in Hangzhou, China. A high degree of genetic diversity was observed for FHB reaction as disease severities ranged from
Page 1 and 2:
Annual Pro
Page 3: -i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
Page 6 and 7: Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
Page 9 and 10: 1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
Page 11 and 12: 3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
Page 13 and 14: 5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
Page 15 and 16: 7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
Page 17 and 18: 9 This project is supported by the
Page 19 and 20: 11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
Page 21 and 22: 13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
Page 23 and 24: 15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
Page 25 and 26: 17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
Page 27 and 28: 19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
Page 29 and 30: 21 Table 14. Agronomic data for sel
Page 31 and 32: 23 Table 16. Agronomic data for win
Page 33 and 34: 25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
Page 35 and 36: Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
Page 37 and 38: 29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
Page 39 and 40: 31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
Page 41 and 42: 33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
Page 43 and 44: 35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 45 and 46: 37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
Page 47 and 48: 39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
Page 49 and 50: 41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
Page 51 and 52: 43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
Page 53: 45 assessments were made by countin
Page 57 and 58: 49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
Page 59 and 60: 51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
Page 61 and 62: 53 We have available the sugarcane
Page 63 and 64: 55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
Page 65 and 66: 57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
Page 67 and 68: 59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
Page 69 and 70: 61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
Page 71 and 72: 63 performance for Montana farmers.
Page 73 and 74: 65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D.
Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
Page 79 and 80: 71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 81 and 82: Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
Page 83 and 84: 75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
Page 85 and 86: 77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 87 and 88: 79 this variety has decreased over
Page 89 and 90: Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
Page 91 and 92: 83 • Management studies for malt
Page 93 and 94: 85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
Page 95 and 96: 87 With funding from the US Wheat a
Page 97 and 98: 89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF B
Page 99 and 100: 91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
Page 101 and 102: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
Page 103 and 104: 95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
Page 105 and 106:
97 Results Results from field and g
Page 107 and 108:
99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
Page 109 and 110:
101 trials of plants regenerated fr
Page 111 and 112:
103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
Page 113 and 114:
105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
Page 115 and 116:
107 involving two susceptible backg
Page 117 and 118:
109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
Page 119 and 120:
111 for traits that are difficult/e
Page 121 and 122:
Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
Page 123 and 124:
115 • All lines in spring yield t
Page 125 and 126:
117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Ore
Page 127 and 128:
119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
Page 129 and 130:
121 Table 7. Across location summar
Page 131 and 132:
123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
Page 133 and 134:
125
Page 135 and 136:
127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
Page 137 and 138:
129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
Page 139 and 140:
131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
Page 141 and 142:
133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
Page 143 and 144:
135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
Page 145 and 146:
137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
Page 147 and 148:
139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
Page 149 and 150:
141 modification measures indicated
Page 151 and 152:
143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
Page 153 and 154:
145 Purification of a serine endope
Page 155 and 156:
147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
Page 157 and 158:
149 with the proteinase T will be s
Page 159 and 160:
151 10°C increase in thermostabili
Page 161 and 162:
153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
Page 163 and 164:
µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
Page 165 and 166:
157 Tissue-specific gene products f
Page 167 and 168:
159 The promoters were subcloned fr
Page 169:
161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?