Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

More documents

Recommendations

Info

22 WINTER BARLEY The winter barley breeding program has produced both six-rowed and two-rowed selections with promising malting quality characteristics that have the potential to compete with existing spring malting barley varieties. The six-rowed winter selection 88Ab536-B (NE 76129/Morex//Morex) continues to be tested in regional trials and used extensively as a parent in barley breeding programs designed to develop winter six-rowed malting barleys. The selection 88Ab536-B has been evaluated in AMBA-sponsored evaluations of malting and brewing quality and appears to have malting quality characteristics similar to the recurrent parent Morex. This selection was included in the 2001 AMBA pilot-scale tests, mainly as a check variety for winter malting barley Agronomic data for 88Ab536-B and other six-rowed winter barley varieties and selections are shown in Table 17. Additional winter barley selections of interest include several two-rowed winter barleys with promising yield and malting quality characteristics. Two-rowed winter barleys prominent in the program include 94Ab1269 (MT81616/81Ab1702), 94Ab1274 (MT81616/81Ab1702), and 95Ab2299 (ORWM8406/Harrington). Agronomic data for these selections plus selected winter barley varieties are shown in Table 18, and malting quality data in Table 19. The selection 94Ab1274 was submitted in 2001 for a third year of AMBA pilot-scale evaluations. This is believed to be the first two-rowed winter selection submitted for AMBA pilot-scale evaluations. In addition, Oregon State University selections STAB 7, STAB 47, and STAB 113 were also planted in this drill strip series in September 2000 and submitted in 2001 for AMBA pilot-scale evaluations. The 2000-01 Aberdeen winter barley nursery included 100 entries in replicated yield trials. Eighty entries were grown in a 2000-01 nonreplicated nursery and over 6500 headrows were evaluated. In addition, the 2000-01 winter barley nursery included two replicated trials of winter barleys developed at Oregon State University, one replicated trial of Russian Wheat Aphid resistant materials from Oklahoma plus over 100 observation plots and 600 headrows. The 2000-01 winter barley trials were the most extensive winter barley trials ever planted at Aberdeen and all of the trials had good winter survival. Named varieties planted in the current replicated trials include ‘Boyer’, ‘Cyclone’, ‘Eight-Twelve’, ‘Fanfare’, ‘Hesk’, ‘Hundred’, ‘Kamiak’, ‘Kold’, ‘Mathias’, ‘Merian’, ‘Opal’, ‘Petula’, ‘Pipkin’, ‘Plaisant’, ‘Puffin’, ‘P721’, ‘P954’, ‘Rifle’, ‘Schuyler’, ‘Scio’, ‘Sprinter’, ‘Strider’, and ‘Sunstar Pride’. Agronomic data for three years of testing at Aberdeen are shown in Table 16.
23 Table 16. Agronomic data for winter varieties and selections grown under irrigation in Winter Barley Nursery A at Aberdeen, Idaho, 1997-98 thru 2000-01. (excludes 1998-99 season) Test Plump Heading Variety or Yield Weight Barley Date Height Lodging Selection (bu/A) (lbs/bu) (%) (Julian) (in) (%) No. Trials 3 3 1 3 3 1 86Ab474 186.8 52.3 91 148 29 5 88Ab124 190.4 51.7 86 150 33 4 88Ab926 183.4 51.2 92 149 33 5 88Ab977 192.2 52.0 91 150 33 5 91Ab23 213.1 52.3 93 150 31 4 91Ab36 215.5 51.7 84 150 33 4 91Ab603 198.0 50.8 84 149 32 5 92Ab481 201.8 52.2 93 148 33 6 92Ab561 191.3 52.8 91 149 34 6 96Ab46 193.2 51.7 80 148 31 6 96Ab907 198.3 52.0 93 148 28 4 97Ab23 208.1 52.3 79 150 32 4 Boyer 194.9 51.6 86 150 34 5 Cyclone 200.8 51.7 96 149 34 5 Eight-Twelve 190.1 51.6 95 147 35 4 Hesk 188.7 50.8 85 150 35 5 Hundred 179.5 50.5 86 148 34 3 Kamiak 157.5 51.7 89 143 36 5 Kold 186.4 52.2 82 148 34 7 P721 157.3 53.3 84 146 34 5 P954 166.7 51.8 87 149 33 5 Pipkin 156.2 55.6 98 150 34 6 Puffin 160.5 54.1 99 147 34 6 Schuyler 165.5 52.0 83 150 34 3 Scio 184.0 51.6 89 149 33 5 Sprinter 200.6 52.7 96 150 34 5 Strider 131.4 35.0 95 95 23 5
Page 1 and 2: Annual Pro
Page 3: -i- INTRODUCTION The March 2002 <st
Page 6 and 7: Barley Transformation G.J. Muehlbau
Page 9 and 10: 1 2000/2001 WINTER NURSERY: BARLEY
Page 11 and 12: 3 2001 Barley Stripe Rust Screening
Page 13 and 14: 5 Triumph/Tyra//Arupo, a selection
Page 15 and 16: 7 Washington (Fossum Cereals and Wa
Page 17 and 18: 9 This project is supported by the
Page 19 and 20: 11 ‘Triumph’, ‘Valier’, ‘
Page 21 and 22: 13 Table 2. Agronomic data for sele
Page 23 and 24: 15 Table 4. Agronomic data for sele
Page 25 and 26: 17 Table 8. Malting quality data* f
Page 27 and 28: 19 Six-rowed barley selections of c
Page 29: 21 Table 14. Agronomic data for sel
Page 33 and 34: 25 Table 19. Malting quality data*
Page 35 and 36: Garnet/98Ab11865 Garnet/98Ab12895 9
Page 37 and 38: 29 rust resistant NSGC accessions o
Page 39 and 40: 31 DEVELOPMENT OF SIX-ROWED MALTING
Page 41 and 42: 33 backcrossing. The selfed lines w
Page 43 and 44: 35 MINNESOTA BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 45 and 46: 37 ADVANCED LINE EVALUATION Varieti
Page 47 and 48: 39 OTHER BARLEY DISEASES In 2001, r
Page 49 and 50: 41 Wingbermuehle, W. J., K.M. Belin
Page 51 and 52: 43 In 2001 winter/spring, over 300
Page 53 and 54: 45 assessments were made by countin
Page 55 and 56: 47 IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL DISEASE
Page 57 and 58: 49 Unfortunately, disease levels in
Page 59 and 60: 51 BARLEY TRANSFORMATION G.J. Muehl
Page 61 and 62: 53 We have available the sugarcane
Page 63 and 64: 55 Secondly, we tried to grow F. gr
Page 65 and 66: 57 References: Issac, S. and Jennin
Page 67 and 68: 59 Huntley-dryland) with two replic
Page 69 and 70: 61 Table 2. 1992 thru 2001 Overall
Page 71 and 72: 63 performance for Montana farmers.
Page 73 and 74: 65 Blake, T,. Hensleigh P., Boss D.
Page 75 and 76: 67 settling tower cannot accommodat
Page 77 and 78: Table 3. Seedling reaction to strip
Page 79 and 80: 71 TWO-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 81 and 82:
Table 1. Agronomic trait comparison
Page 83 and 84:
75 mutants reduce plant vigor and g
Page 85 and 86:
77 SIX-ROWED BARLEY IMPROVEMENT PRO
Page 87 and 88:
79 this variety has decreased over
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7. Malt quality comparisons o
Page 91 and 92:
83 • Management studies for malt
Page 93 and 94:
85 STUDIES ON BARLEY DISEASES AND T
Page 95 and 96:
87 With funding from the US Wheat a
Page 97 and 98:
89 MALTING AND BREWING QUALITY OF B
Page 99 and 100:
91 β-glucans, it might be most ins
Page 101 and 102:
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 93 Figure 1.
Page 103 and 104:
95 Bolin, P., Schwarz, P., Jones, B
Page 105 and 106:
97 Results Results from field and g
Page 107 and 108:
99 DEVELOPING BARLEY TISSUE CULTURE
Page 109 and 110:
101 trials of plants regenerated fr
Page 111 and 112:
103 Table 2. Agronomic performance
Page 113 and 114:
105 BSMV spread between entries. Ho
Page 115 and 116:
107 involving two susceptible backg
Page 117 and 118:
109 THE OREGON BARLEY IMPROVEMENT P
Page 119 and 120:
111 for traits that are difficult/e
Page 121 and 122:
Germplasm Development: 113 Crosses:
Page 123 and 124:
115 • All lines in spring yield t
Page 125 and 126:
117 Table 2. Agronomic data for Ore
Page 127 and 128:
119 Table 6. Malting quality of win
Page 129 and 130:
121 Table 7. Across location summar
Page 131 and 132:
123 MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIF
Page 133 and 134:
125
Page 135 and 136:
127 exchanges. Spring and winter ba
Page 137 and 138:
129 Table 2. 2000-2001 Agronomic Pe
Page 139 and 140:
131 Table 7. Spring 2- and 6-Row #
Page 141 and 142:
133 2. Direct Seeding Cropping Syst
Page 143 and 144:
135 D.M. Wesenberg - spring and win
Page 145 and 146:
137 A STUDY OF THE MALTING QUALITY
Page 147 and 148:
139 Methods. Our malting schedule.
Page 149 and 150:
141 modification measures indicated
Page 151 and 152:
143 CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PROTEIN
Page 153 and 154:
145 Purification of a serine endope
Page 155 and 156:
147 STUDIES ON THE PROTEINASES THAT
Page 157 and 158:
149 with the proteinase T will be s
Page 159 and 160:
151 10°C increase in thermostabili
Page 161 and 162:
153 Sissons MJ and MacGregor AW (19
Page 163 and 164:
µM Carbohydrate / Unit of α-Gluco
Page 165 and 166:
157 Tissue-specific gene products f
Page 167 and 168:
159 The promoters were subcloned fr
Page 169:
161 Fig. 3. Expression of Trx-Hth f
show all

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?