16.08.2013 Views

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

Annual Progress Report on Malting Barley Research March, 2002

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

123<br />

MOLECULAR MARKER ASSISTED MODIFICATION OF TRADITIONAL HIGH<br />

QUALITY MALTING BARLEYS<br />

A. Kleinhofs, D. v<strong>on</strong> Wettstein & S. E. Ullrich<br />

Dept. Crop and Soil Sciences<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong> State University<br />

Pullman, WA. 99164-6420<br />

The major emphasis during the reporting period was <strong>on</strong> the Harringt<strong>on</strong> x Bar<strong>on</strong>esse cross.<br />

Harrigt<strong>on</strong> x Bar<strong>on</strong>esse<br />

Yield Analysis<br />

In summer 2001, 8 BC2 lines and 20 BC3 lines were planted in the regi<strong>on</strong>al yield trials at<br />

three locati<strong>on</strong>s: Pullman, Fairfield, WA and Royal Slope, WA. These lines yielded<br />

similar to Bar<strong>on</strong>esse in 2000 and were selected to represent the highest yielding lines<br />

from all locati<strong>on</strong>s and years with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of K11-3, which was included as a low<br />

yielding check. 26 lines grown in Pullman, 12 lines from Fairfield, and 26 lines from<br />

Royal Slope yielded statistically similar to Bar<strong>on</strong>esse. 14 of the 26 lines from Pullman, 8<br />

of 12 lines from Fairfield, and 19 of the 26 lines from Royal Slope yielded higher than<br />

Harringt<strong>on</strong>, although differences were not significant (Table 1).<br />

<strong>Malting</strong> Analysis<br />

<strong>Malting</strong> analysis was performed at Madis<strong>on</strong>, WI in 2001 <strong>on</strong> selected lines grown at<br />

Pullman in summer 2000. Analysis was d<strong>on</strong>e using an experimental Joe White malting<br />

system. 62 lines were malted, with two replicati<strong>on</strong>s when possible. From this data, 13<br />

lines produced malting characteristics similar to Harringt<strong>on</strong> as well as yields similar to<br />

Bar<strong>on</strong>esse.<br />

In fall 2001, 28 lines grown at Royal Slope in summer 2001 were malted again at<br />

Madis<strong>on</strong>, WI. Standard malting analysis was used <strong>on</strong> three replicati<strong>on</strong>s for all lines.<br />

Based <strong>on</strong> the combined yield and malting data, 6 lines have c<strong>on</strong>sistently yielded similar<br />

to Bar<strong>on</strong>esse with malting quality similar to Harringt<strong>on</strong> (Table 2). A subset of these lines<br />

exhibiting the best yield and malting data will be grown in the state uniform nurseries in<br />

summer <strong>2002</strong>.<br />

Genetic Analysis<br />

When comparing the combined yield data of the BC2 and BC3 populati<strong>on</strong>s to the<br />

genotype data of the NILs, two regi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> 2HL and <strong>on</strong>e regi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> 3HL are suggested as<br />

c<strong>on</strong>taining yield related QTL. The proximal regi<strong>on</strong> of 2HL is bracketed by Bmy2 -<br />

MWG699 while the distal regi<strong>on</strong> is bracketed by ABG072 - ksuD22. On 3HL, the QTL<br />

regi<strong>on</strong> is bracketed by MWG571A - MWG961. Each high yielding NIL c<strong>on</strong>tains at least<br />

<strong>on</strong>e of these regi<strong>on</strong>s (Fig. 1). One interesting note is that line 7 does not c<strong>on</strong>tain any<br />

Bar<strong>on</strong>esse alleles in these target regi<strong>on</strong>s, yet yielded significantly greater than Harringt<strong>on</strong><br />

at Pullman in 1999 and 2000, and statistically similar to Bar<strong>on</strong>esse, although not<br />

significantly greater than Harringt<strong>on</strong>, in all locati<strong>on</strong>s in 2001. This suggested that other<br />

yield QTLs from Bar<strong>on</strong>esse exist that have not been identified. Also, line K11-3 c<strong>on</strong>tains

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!