- Page 1 and 2:
APPLICATION OF MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR
- Page 3 and 4:
Abstract Landfill leachate is a com
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents Chapter Title Pag
- Page 7 and 8:
4.5.6 Cost Analysis for Operation 1
- Page 9 and 10:
4.4 Effect of Free Ammonia Concentr
- Page 11 and 12:
4.16 COD Concentration in the Influ
- Page 13 and 14:
MWCO Molecular Weight Cut-off MWW M
- Page 15 and 16:
1.1 Background Chapter 1 Introducti
- Page 17 and 18:
generally unsuccessful in removal o
- Page 19 and 20:
2.1 Introduction Chapter 2 Literatu
- Page 21 and 22:
In the municipal solid waste landfi
- Page 23 and 24:
COD/TOC, VS/FS and VFA/TOC ratios o
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 2.3 presents the general leac
- Page 27 and 28:
Ground water 2.7.1 Seasonal Variati
- Page 29 and 30:
Table 2.5 Variation of COD, BOD & B
- Page 31 and 32:
entails the re-circulation of leach
- Page 33 and 34:
Table 2.8 Summary of Biokinetic Coe
- Page 35 and 36:
that extensive loss of nitrogen (up
- Page 37 and 38:
ammonia could only be achieved when
- Page 39 and 40:
Table 2.10 Treatment Efficiencies o
- Page 41 and 42:
Activated Carbon Adsorption Granula
- Page 43 and 44:
Colloidal material as well as metal
- Page 45 and 46:
iologically, physical-chemical proc
- Page 47 and 48:
Ammonia Stripping Air stripping of
- Page 49 and 50:
These systems are land intensive wh
- Page 51 and 52:
the biological treatment can be rep
- Page 53 and 54:
Table 2.16 Typical Leachate Composi
- Page 55 and 56:
influent reached 200 mg/L. For the
- Page 57 and 58:
Table 2.18 Advantages and Disadvant
- Page 59 and 60:
through the effluent. Different ope
- Page 61 and 62:
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids and D
- Page 63 and 64:
2.12 Yeasts 2.12.1 Introduction The
- Page 65 and 66:
Nishihara ESRC Ltd. (2001) studied
- Page 67 and 68:
nitrification-denitrification proce
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 3.1 Composition of Simulated
- Page 71 and 72:
3.4.1 Ammonia Toxicity The experime
- Page 73 and 74:
Figure 3.4 Experiments Conducted to
- Page 75 and 76:
Leachate Option Ammonia Stripping R
- Page 77 and 78:
MW larger than 50 kDa, (2) MW betwe
- Page 79 and 80:
Figure 3.7 Flowchart Showing Ammoni
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 4 Results and Discussion 4.
- Page 83 and 84:
COD Removal Effeciency (%) COD Remo
- Page 85 and 86:
MLSS (mg/L) 14000 12000 10000 8000
- Page 87 and 88:
Specific Growth Rate ( d -1 ) 0.50
- Page 89 and 90:
change in the predominant species w
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 4.4 Effect of Free Ammonia Co
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 4.5 Substrate Utilization by
- Page 95 and 96:
4.3.1 Initial Membrane Resistance P
- Page 97 and 98:
when compared with the present stud
- Page 99 and 100:
COD Removal Efficiency (%) 90 80 70
- Page 101 and 102:
(2) TKN Removal Efficiency Prior to
- Page 103 and 104:
As there was no significant improve
- Page 105 and 106:
The probable reason for frequent fo
- Page 107 and 108:
Ammonia Concentration (mg/L) Ammoni
- Page 109 and 110:
concentration after treatment. Othe
- Page 111 and 112:
After the chemical cleaning of the
- Page 113 and 114:
emoval of 38%. A higher removal in
- Page 115 and 116:
Influent BOD (mg/L) Influent BOD (m
- Page 117 and 118:
(3) TKN Removal Efficiency The TKN
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 4.34 gives the overall TKN r
- Page 121 and 122:
fraction and slowly biodegradable C
- Page 123 and 124:
BOD (mg/L) BOD (mg/L) 6000 5000 400
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 4.39 Molecular Weight Cut-of
- Page 127 and 128:
COD (mg/L) 8000 6000 4000 2000 COD
- Page 129 and 130:
Though, the obtained COD removal ef
- Page 131 and 132:
cake used on the top of the membran
- Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 5 Conclusions and Recommend
- Page 135 and 136:
0.02, respectively. This can be con
- Page 137 and 138:
References Abeling, U., and Seyfrie
- Page 139 and 140:
Brown, M.J., and Lester, J.N., 1980
- Page 141 and 142:
Diamadopoulos, E., 1994. Characteri
- Page 143 and 144: Grady, C.P.L., Daigger, G.T., and L
- Page 145 and 146: Keenan, J.D., Steiner, R.L., and Fu
- Page 147 and 148: Martin, G.M.A., Auzmenti, A.I., and
- Page 149 and 150: Pohland, F.G., and Harper, S.R., 19
- Page 151 and 152: Shin, H.S., An, H., Kang, S.T., Cho
- Page 153 and 154: Visvanathan, C., Ben Aim, R., and P
- Page 155 and 156: Appendix A Pictures of Experiments
- Page 157 and 158: Raw Leachate YMBR Effluent BMBR Eff
- Page 159 and 160: Appendix B Leachate Characteristics
- Page 161 and 162: Table B-2 Acclimation of Mixed Yeas
- Page 163 and 164: Appendix C Experimental Data of Bio
- Page 165 and 166: y: Where: OUR at line g: This is th
- Page 167 and 168: Table C-3 Experimental Results for
- Page 169 and 170: Appendix D Membrane Resistance Stud
- Page 171 and 172: Table D-3 Experimental Data for Det
- Page 173 and 174: Table D-4 Experimental Data for Det
- Page 175 and 176: Pressure (kPa) Pressure (kPa) 25 20
- Page 177 and 178: Appendix E MBR without Ammonia Stri
- Page 179 and 180: Day HRT (h) pH COD (mg/L) Feed Reac
- Page 181 and 182: Day HRT (h) pH COD (mg/L) Feed Reac
- Page 183 and 184: Table E-3 Variation in TMP with Tim
- Page 185 and 186: Appendix F Ammonia Stripping Studie
- Page 187 and 188: Table F-5 Pilot Scale Study on Ammo
- Page 189 and 190: Table G-1 Feed, Reactor and Effluen
- Page 191 and 192: Table G-3 Feed, Reactor and Effluen
- Page 193: Appendix H Other Studies 179
- Page 197: Table H-6 Chemical Cost for the Yea