Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COD Removal Efficiency<br />
(%)<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
BMBR YMBR<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />
Time (days)<br />
Figure 4.17 COD Removal Efficiency in <strong>th</strong>e BMBR and YMBR at Different HRT<br />
The average COD removal efficiency in YMBR system was 63% when HRT<br />
ranged from 16 h to 24 h, whereas in BMBR system, <strong>th</strong>e average COD removal efficiency<br />
was 60% at HRT from 16 h to 24 h as listed in Table 4.6 and Table 4.7. When municipal<br />
wastewater wi<strong>th</strong> 300 mg/L COD was treated, a 97% <strong>of</strong> removal could be <strong>ac</strong>hieve (Fan, et<br />
al., 1996). At HRT <strong>of</strong> 12 h, <strong>th</strong>e average COD removal efficiency in YMBR and BMBR<br />
was to 60% and 51%, respectively. The decrease in removal efficiency in <strong>th</strong>e b<strong>ac</strong>terial<br />
system at a lower HRT was more apparent, which could be due to <strong>th</strong>e presence <strong>of</strong><br />
ammonia in <strong>th</strong>e le<strong>ac</strong>hate posing toxicity to <strong>th</strong>e b<strong>ac</strong>terial culture. This aspect is also<br />
supported by <strong>th</strong>e biokinetic studies, which states <strong>th</strong>at <strong>th</strong>e ammonia inhibits b<strong>ac</strong>terial cells to<br />
a greater extent <strong>th</strong>an <strong>th</strong>e yeast cells.<br />
The COD removal in 12 h HRT in bo<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e re<strong>ac</strong>tors was very low compared to <strong>th</strong>at in<br />
o<strong>th</strong>er HRTs. In addition to a better COD removal efficiency, YMBR was more stable <strong>th</strong>an<br />
BMBR. As, <strong>th</strong>e yeast system did not show a significant improvement compared to b<strong>ac</strong>teria<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> COD removal, it could be suggested <strong>th</strong>at fur<strong>th</strong>er investigations are required to<br />
conclude.<br />
Table 4.6 COD Removal Efficiency in YMBR System at Different HRT<br />
Values<br />
COD Removal (%)<br />
HRT 24 h HRT 20 h HRT 16 h HRT 12 h<br />
Maximum 69 70 75 72<br />
Minimum 58 60 59 50<br />
Average 63 64 66 60<br />
Std. Dev. 4 4 6 8<br />
85<br />
26<br />
24<br />
22<br />
20<br />
18<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
HRT (h)