28.08.2013 Views

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COD Removal Efficiency<br />

(%)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

BMBR YMBR<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180<br />

Time (days)<br />

Figure 4.17 COD Removal Efficiency in <strong>th</strong>e BMBR and YMBR at Different HRT<br />

The average COD removal efficiency in YMBR system was 63% when HRT<br />

ranged from 16 h to 24 h, whereas in BMBR system, <strong>th</strong>e average COD removal efficiency<br />

was 60% at HRT from 16 h to 24 h as listed in Table 4.6 and Table 4.7. When municipal<br />

wastewater wi<strong>th</strong> 300 mg/L COD was treated, a 97% <strong>of</strong> removal could be <strong>ac</strong>hieve (Fan, et<br />

al., 1996). At HRT <strong>of</strong> 12 h, <strong>th</strong>e average COD removal efficiency in YMBR and BMBR<br />

was to 60% and 51%, respectively. The decrease in removal efficiency in <strong>th</strong>e b<strong>ac</strong>terial<br />

system at a lower HRT was more apparent, which could be due to <strong>th</strong>e presence <strong>of</strong><br />

ammonia in <strong>th</strong>e le<strong>ac</strong>hate posing toxicity to <strong>th</strong>e b<strong>ac</strong>terial culture. This aspect is also<br />

supported by <strong>th</strong>e biokinetic studies, which states <strong>th</strong>at <strong>th</strong>e ammonia inhibits b<strong>ac</strong>terial cells to<br />

a greater extent <strong>th</strong>an <strong>th</strong>e yeast cells.<br />

The COD removal in 12 h HRT in bo<strong>th</strong> <strong>th</strong>e re<strong>ac</strong>tors was very low compared to <strong>th</strong>at in<br />

o<strong>th</strong>er HRTs. In addition to a better COD removal efficiency, YMBR was more stable <strong>th</strong>an<br />

BMBR. As, <strong>th</strong>e yeast system did not show a significant improvement compared to b<strong>ac</strong>teria<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> COD removal, it could be suggested <strong>th</strong>at fur<strong>th</strong>er investigations are required to<br />

conclude.<br />

Table 4.6 COD Removal Efficiency in YMBR System at Different HRT<br />

Values<br />

COD Removal (%)<br />

HRT 24 h HRT 20 h HRT 16 h HRT 12 h<br />

Maximum 69 70 75 72<br />

Minimum 58 60 59 50<br />

Average 63 64 66 60<br />

Std. Dev. 4 4 6 8<br />

85<br />

26<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

HRT (h)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!