Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids and Dissolved Substances<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e MLSS concentration on <strong>th</strong>e membrane fouling have been reported<br />
by many researchers as membrane resistance varies proportionally in MLSS concentration<br />
(Fane, et al., 1981) and when <strong>th</strong>e MLSS concentration exceeded 40,000 mg/L, <strong>th</strong>e flux is<br />
found <strong>th</strong>at dramatically decrease (Yamamoto, et al., 1989). However, Lubbecke, et al.<br />
(1995) illustrated <strong>th</strong>at MLSS concentrations upto 30,000 mg/L is not directly responsible<br />
for irreversible fouling, and <strong>th</strong>at viscosity and dissolved matter have a more significant<br />
imp<strong>ac</strong>t on flux decline. The increase in viscosity to yield a substantial suction pressure<br />
increase can causes <strong>th</strong>e failure <strong>of</strong> MBR system (Ueda, et al., 1996).<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> MLSS, dissolved matter, and viscosity on membrane fouling could be<br />
estimated as given by Sato and Ishii (1991) in <strong>th</strong>e following manner:<br />
Where:<br />
0.<br />
926<br />
47<br />
1.<br />
368<br />
0.<br />
326<br />
R = 842 . 7 * ∆P<br />
* ( MLSS)<br />
* ( COD)<br />
* ( µ )<br />
Eq. 2.1<br />
R = Filtration resistance, m -1<br />
∆P = Transmembrane pressure, Pa<br />
µ = Viscosity, Pa.s<br />
MLSS = mixed liquor suspended solid, mg/L<br />
COD = Soluble chemical oxygen demand, mg/L<br />
According to <strong>th</strong>e few researches, <strong>th</strong>e role <strong>of</strong> mixed liquor in membrane fouling was<br />
due to <strong>th</strong>e presence <strong>of</strong> suspended solids (SS), colloids, and dissolved matter which<br />
contributed to resistance against filtration by 65, 30, and 5 % respectively (Derfrance, et al.,<br />
2000). Through fr<strong>ac</strong>tionation <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e mixed liquor <strong>of</strong> <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge into floc cell, EPS<br />
and dissolved mater, Chang and Lee (1998) indicated EPS as an important component<br />
contributing to fouling causing resistance in <strong>th</strong>e filtration process. However, <strong>th</strong>ese studies<br />
show <strong>th</strong>at individual fouling resistances were not additive due to <strong>th</strong>e sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e resistances<br />
given by e<strong>ac</strong>h component was found to be greater <strong>th</strong>an <strong>th</strong>e measured total resistance.<br />
Wisniewski and Grasmick (1998) fr<strong>ac</strong>tionated <strong>th</strong>e <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge suspension into<br />
settleable particles (particle size above 100 µm), supr<strong>ac</strong>olloidal-colloidal fr<strong>ac</strong>tion (nonsettleable<br />
particle wi<strong>th</strong> a size ranging from 0.05 to 100 µm), and soluble fr<strong>ac</strong>tion (obtained<br />
after filtration wi<strong>th</strong> 0.05 µm membrane). They revealed <strong>th</strong>at 52% <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e total resistance<br />
could be attributed to soluble components.<br />
Particle Size Distribution<br />
Many researchers have sought to establish <strong>th</strong>e influence <strong>of</strong> particle size on <strong>th</strong>e cake<br />
layer resistance. Generally, <strong>th</strong>e particle size <strong>of</strong> an <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge floc ranges from 1.2 to<br />
600 µm (Jorand, et al., 1995). The break-up <strong>of</strong> biological flocs, generating fine colloids<br />
and cells which later form a denser cake layer on <strong>th</strong>e membrane is due to <strong>th</strong>e shear force<br />
rising as a result <strong>of</strong> pumping during cross-flow filtration (Wisniewski and Grasmick, 1998;<br />
Kim, et al., 2001). According to Wisniewski, et al. (2000), after <strong>th</strong>e floc breakup, <strong>th</strong>e<br />
suspension produced consists mainly <strong>of</strong> particles having a size <strong>of</strong> around 2 µm causing a<br />
decrease in flux. 97% <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e particles in <strong>th</strong>e MBR system have an average diameter smaller<br />
<strong>th</strong>an 10 µm, while <strong>th</strong>e <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge contained flocs range from 20 to 200 µm in size<br />
(Cicek, et al., 1999).