28.08.2013 Views

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

Thesis - faculty.ait.ac.th - Asian Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids and Dissolved Substances<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e MLSS concentration on <strong>th</strong>e membrane fouling have been reported<br />

by many researchers as membrane resistance varies proportionally in MLSS concentration<br />

(Fane, et al., 1981) and when <strong>th</strong>e MLSS concentration exceeded 40,000 mg/L, <strong>th</strong>e flux is<br />

found <strong>th</strong>at dramatically decrease (Yamamoto, et al., 1989). However, Lubbecke, et al.<br />

(1995) illustrated <strong>th</strong>at MLSS concentrations upto 30,000 mg/L is not directly responsible<br />

for irreversible fouling, and <strong>th</strong>at viscosity and dissolved matter have a more significant<br />

imp<strong>ac</strong>t on flux decline. The increase in viscosity to yield a substantial suction pressure<br />

increase can causes <strong>th</strong>e failure <strong>of</strong> MBR system (Ueda, et al., 1996).<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> MLSS, dissolved matter, and viscosity on membrane fouling could be<br />

estimated as given by Sato and Ishii (1991) in <strong>th</strong>e following manner:<br />

Where:<br />

0.<br />

926<br />

47<br />

1.<br />

368<br />

0.<br />

326<br />

R = 842 . 7 * ∆P<br />

* ( MLSS)<br />

* ( COD)<br />

* ( µ )<br />

Eq. 2.1<br />

R = Filtration resistance, m -1<br />

∆P = Transmembrane pressure, Pa<br />

µ = Viscosity, Pa.s<br />

MLSS = mixed liquor suspended solid, mg/L<br />

COD = Soluble chemical oxygen demand, mg/L<br />

According to <strong>th</strong>e few researches, <strong>th</strong>e role <strong>of</strong> mixed liquor in membrane fouling was<br />

due to <strong>th</strong>e presence <strong>of</strong> suspended solids (SS), colloids, and dissolved matter which<br />

contributed to resistance against filtration by 65, 30, and 5 % respectively (Derfrance, et al.,<br />

2000). Through fr<strong>ac</strong>tionation <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e mixed liquor <strong>of</strong> <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge into floc cell, EPS<br />

and dissolved mater, Chang and Lee (1998) indicated EPS as an important component<br />

contributing to fouling causing resistance in <strong>th</strong>e filtration process. However, <strong>th</strong>ese studies<br />

show <strong>th</strong>at individual fouling resistances were not additive due to <strong>th</strong>e sum <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e resistances<br />

given by e<strong>ac</strong>h component was found to be greater <strong>th</strong>an <strong>th</strong>e measured total resistance.<br />

Wisniewski and Grasmick (1998) fr<strong>ac</strong>tionated <strong>th</strong>e <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge suspension into<br />

settleable particles (particle size above 100 µm), supr<strong>ac</strong>olloidal-colloidal fr<strong>ac</strong>tion (nonsettleable<br />

particle wi<strong>th</strong> a size ranging from 0.05 to 100 µm), and soluble fr<strong>ac</strong>tion (obtained<br />

after filtration wi<strong>th</strong> 0.05 µm membrane). They revealed <strong>th</strong>at 52% <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e total resistance<br />

could be attributed to soluble components.<br />

Particle Size Distribution<br />

Many researchers have sought to establish <strong>th</strong>e influence <strong>of</strong> particle size on <strong>th</strong>e cake<br />

layer resistance. Generally, <strong>th</strong>e particle size <strong>of</strong> an <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge floc ranges from 1.2 to<br />

600 µm (Jorand, et al., 1995). The break-up <strong>of</strong> biological flocs, generating fine colloids<br />

and cells which later form a denser cake layer on <strong>th</strong>e membrane is due to <strong>th</strong>e shear force<br />

rising as a result <strong>of</strong> pumping during cross-flow filtration (Wisniewski and Grasmick, 1998;<br />

Kim, et al., 2001). According to Wisniewski, et al. (2000), after <strong>th</strong>e floc breakup, <strong>th</strong>e<br />

suspension produced consists mainly <strong>of</strong> particles having a size <strong>of</strong> around 2 µm causing a<br />

decrease in flux. 97% <strong>of</strong> <strong>th</strong>e particles in <strong>th</strong>e MBR system have an average diameter smaller<br />

<strong>th</strong>an 10 µm, while <strong>th</strong>e <strong>ac</strong>tivated sludge contained flocs range from 20 to 200 µm in size<br />

(Cicek, et al., 1999).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!