15.11.2013 Views

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

For this reason, generalizations about the caste society, especially of a<br />

positive nature, will have some minor exceptions to them. But<br />

formulations have to be made in order to express the dominant<br />

tendencies or directions of a system or a movement. Subject to this<br />

consideration, one of the very important features of the Indian Society<br />

was that the mass of the people were deliberately precluded from all<br />

political and military activity. This explains the marked absence of<br />

any militant political movement at the initiative and in the interests<br />

of the masses.<br />

a) Prostration: This political and military inertia of the<br />

Indian population did not develop by accident. It was a part of the<br />

clearly thought out design of the caste ideologues. According to the<br />

Aitareya Brahmana (vii. 29.3), “he (Vaisya) is to be lived on by another<br />

and to be oppressed at will.” To achieve this purpose, the Brahmins<br />

made the use of arms the sole prerogative of the ruling castes, e.g. to<br />

begin with the Kshatriyas, and, later, the legitimized Rajputs. This<br />

was the best arrangement they could make. The outcome of the<br />

struggle for political power between the different elements of the ruling<br />

caste did not affect the Brahmins as a caste. Whosoever won had to<br />

be guided by his Purohita. Besides, the legitimation of the caste status<br />

of the ruling castes was solely in the hands of the Brahmins as a caste.<br />

Whosoever won had to be guided by his Purohita. Besides, the<br />

legitimation of the caste status of the ruling castes was solely in the<br />

hands of the Brahmins. ‘Legitimation by a recognized religion has always<br />

been decisive for an alliance between politically and socially dominant<br />

classes and the priesthood.’ 1 It was much more so in the caste society.<br />

So, from the time Brahminism become supreme, the mass of the<br />

people were reduced to the status of idle spectators to the struggle<br />

from military and political supremacy that raged around them.<br />

Magesthanes noted that the peasants went about their work quite<br />

unconcerned close to the battle-fields. Whether the people were totally<br />

disarmed or not is not quite certain; but it is clear that they were<br />

psychologically disarmed by the caste ideology. Pacifism and the caste<br />

system ‘blocked the development of the military power of the citizenry;<br />

pacifism blocked it in principle and the castes in practice, by hindering<br />

the establishment of a polis or commune in the European sense.’ 2 It<br />

was for this reason that, on the eclipse of the Kshatriyas, a few petty<br />

Rajput princes, springing up from the desert of Jasselmere, were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!