15.11.2013 Views

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

217<br />

vanquished. This contrast in the attitudes of the Rajputs and the<br />

Khalsa towards Mughal authority arose because of the difference in<br />

their value patterns. The Rajputs were motivated by their feudal<br />

interests and prestige; and these were adjustable in the overall Mughal<br />

feudal set up. The Khalsa were struggling to fight religious and political<br />

domination for a revolutionary cause. Hence, there was for them no<br />

room for compromise. They spurned Abdali’s several offers of peace 25<br />

and fined Ala Singh for having compromised with him. 26<br />

The second trend of Rajput history which offers a marked<br />

contrast to the history of the Khalsa is that the mass of Rajputs had<br />

been robbed of all capacity for initiative. The patriarchal-cum-feudal<br />

constitution of their polity had made the common Rajput soldier lean<br />

heavily on his Thakur, the Thakur on his chief, and the chief on his<br />

overload. Their tradition had also taught them to follow blindly their<br />

leaders in the same hierarchical order. Consequently, the Rajputs<br />

followed their leaders into the Mughal camp without questioning the<br />

propriety of this step. Their fidelity was linked to persons and not to<br />

a cause. Another result of it was that the Rajputs were all at sea when<br />

the Mughal empire was tottering. At that time, many upstart aspirants<br />

to political power cropped up. But, the Rajputs found it difficult to<br />

retain even whatever principalities they had. They became the<br />

plaything of the Marathas. 27 This happened evidently because, by<br />

their continued and long dependence on Mughal authority, even the<br />

Rajput chiefs had lost their political and military initiative. For the<br />

same reason, the Rajputs never took to guerilla warfare; because it<br />

required an inspiration and the conviction of a just-cause, and cohesion<br />

and initiative at all levels of the society. The Rajputs lacked the<br />

required inspiration and initiative.<br />

The Khalsa, on the other hand, owed its loyalty not to persons<br />

but to a cause. The Gurus had been emphasizing this point from the<br />

very beginning. Guru Gobind Singh had bestowed leadership<br />

on the Khalsa as a whole. It was owing to their training that<br />

the Khalsa conveyed to Guru Gobind Singh that they would<br />

not follow Banda if he aspired for sovereignty. And, when he<br />

deviated from the <strong>Sikh</strong> principles, they parted company with<br />

him even though they knew that the division would be quite

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!