15.11.2013 Views

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

276<br />

(i)<br />

Eric R. Wolf, who has made a case study of peasant wars of<br />

the twentieth century in six countries, gives a number of reasons<br />

why: ‘The peasant is especially handicapped in passing from<br />

passive recognition of wrongs to political participation as a<br />

means of setting them right. He further adds: ‘Marxists have<br />

long argued that peasants without outside leadership cannot<br />

make a revolution: and our case material would bear them<br />

out.’ The Jats in India were no more radical. In their history,<br />

their unity of purpose and loyalty never rose higher than the<br />

tribal of clannish level, and they showed a singular lack of<br />

political consciousness. A deputation of Jats and Meds is<br />

said to have waited on King Dajusha and begged him to<br />

nominate a king, whom both sides would obey. Accordingly,<br />

he appointed his sister to rule over them and they willingly<br />

submitted to her. The Jats form the majority in Sindh; they<br />

are three times more than the Rajputs in the Punjab, and<br />

are approximately equal to the number of Rajputs in Bikaner,<br />

Jaisalmer and Marwar. Yet, Muhammadan historians never<br />

took much notice of them, because politically they were<br />

inconsequential. As against them, the pages of Indian history<br />

are full of Rajput exploits. It is only in the small area of<br />

Bharatpur that a Jat principally was established on the ruins<br />

of the Mughal Empire. Its founder Churaman, who used<br />

the tribal sentiments of the Jats for his own ends, was a<br />

pure opportunists and was never inspired by any high ideals.<br />

He turned, for personal reasons, against the Syed brothers,<br />

to whom he owed so much for his rise to power. How then<br />

do we explain that in the <strong>Sikh</strong> movement along the Jat, after<br />

all a class of common peasantry, developed a political<br />

consciousness that led to capturing power not for the Jats<br />

as such, but for the Khalsa, which was composed of men<br />

of all castes and suffered, without compromising their sociopolitical<br />

and ideological aims and ideals, one of the worst<br />

persecutions in history? How is it that not a single Missal<br />

came to be named after the names of those clannish sub-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!