15.11.2013 Views

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

Introductory - Global Sikh Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

70<br />

CHAPTER VII<br />

The Radical Bhakti Ideology-<br />

Its Social Significance<br />

The Radical Bhakti movements, starting with Namdev, was also<br />

one of the liberal trends which ultimately succumbed to the orthodox<br />

caste order and its ideology. These humanistic Bhaktas were<br />

ideologically opposed both to the theory of caste and the narrow<br />

interpretations given to Islam by the bigoted Mullahs, In the earlier<br />

chapters we purposely omitted to refer to their role as it deserves<br />

separate treatment, especially because in certain respects their ideology<br />

has distinct and close affinities with that of the <strong>Sikh</strong> Gurus. We shall<br />

call these Bhaktas as belonging to the Radial Bhakti School.<br />

The overwhelming emphasis on Bhakti or devotion has be to<br />

the erroneous impression that the entire Bhakti movement was a<br />

purely religious upsurge. This wrong impression is there partly<br />

because some of the Bhakti saints, e.g. Mirabai, were so much<br />

absorbed in their religious devotion that they never touch the social<br />

aspects for religion. Nevertheless, the social import of the teachings<br />

of one of the Bhakti schools, as we shall see, cannot be denied.<br />

Also, it would be equally misleading to regard Bhakti-marga as a<br />

uniform school of thought. There were deep differences in the<br />

theological and the social ideologies of the different Bhakti schools.<br />

“a whole world of difference lies between the Bhagavatism of the<br />

reformation and that of the Bhagavadgita.” 1 Within the Bhakti<br />

school of the so-called reformation itself, there were ideological<br />

variations from one Bhakta (saint) to another. The objects of devotion<br />

of some of these were sectarian deities, while other preached<br />

unalloyed monotheism. A part from these theological distinctions,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!