Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
input forces applied at nodes in the local sensor community to stress in elements in the<br />
same community. The structural analysis is, thus, performed as the product of the modest<br />
size matrix and DLVs<br />
The DLV method implementation on the Imote2 is now numerically examined. The<br />
DLV method based on a known mass perturbation is employed in this numerical<br />
validation; a similar procedure was employed to implement and validate the SDLV<br />
method.<br />
Prior to monitoring local sensor communities, mass normalization constants are<br />
estimated. These constants are also estimated on the Imote2. The structural responses of<br />
the truss before and after the addition of the known mass at node 11 are injected to 10<br />
Imote2s corresponding to nodes 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, and 25. The Imote2 at<br />
node 21 works as the cluster head and applies NExT and ERA before and after the mass<br />
perturbation. <strong>Using</strong> the identified modal parameters, the cluster head estimates the mass<br />
normalization constants using Eq. (6.21). The estimated mass normalization constants are<br />
listed in Table 7.4 together with the difference between the constants estimated on the<br />
Imote2 and the PC. The mass normalization constant estimation on the Imote2 is<br />
numerically identical to that on the PC.<br />
<strong>Monitoring</strong> of the local sensor community consisting of six Imote2s at nodes 2, 3, 4,<br />
5, 6, and 7 is now examined. The injection of data, correlation function estimates by<br />
NExT, and modal identification by ERA are repeated for the truss acceleration response<br />
data measured before and after element 9 is replaced with a thinner element. Identified<br />
modal frequencies and mode shapes before and after damage, as well as the estimated<br />
mass normalization constants, are used to construct flexibility matrices. As intermediate<br />
results, the singular values in Eq. (6.24) estimated on the Imote2 and on the PC are<br />
compared in Table 7.5. The DLVs calculated on the Imote2 are also compared with those<br />
estimated on the PC. The singular values and DLVs are considered numerically identical.<br />
The DLVs are then applied to the truss model to estimate the normalized accumulated<br />
stress. As shown in Table 7.6, the stress in element 9 is smaller than the threshold value of<br />
0.3. Because the normalized accumulated stress is only compared with the threshold<br />
value, the stress does not need to have many effective bits. Therefore, the stress estimation<br />
on the Imote2 is performed in a single-precision float data type having approximately<br />
seven effective digits. The normalized accumulated stress estimated on the Imote2 and on<br />
the PC is identical with respect to the precision of the float data type.<br />
7.2.5 DCS logic<br />
The DCS logic to find inconsistency in damage localization results is implemented on<br />
the Imote2. Sensor communities close to each other exchange information about damaged<br />
elements. Because the topology of sensor communities is formulated to have overlaps in<br />
monitored elements, at least two sensor communities monitor each element of the<br />
structure. If some communities find contradicting damage detection results, these<br />
communities repeat sensing, data processing, and the DCS logic. Also, if sensor<br />
communities detect damaged elements in a consistent manner, these communities report<br />
122