Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Integration of different types of information obtained from smart sensors has the<br />
possibility of improving damage detection capabilities. For example, smart sensors<br />
measuring acceleration, strain, wind velocity, temperature, and humidity may use four<br />
types of sensors to detect damage more reliably than smart sensors employing only<br />
accelerometers. Each measurand has its own characteristics. Acceleration responses<br />
reflect global motion of a structure and have particularly rich information at higher<br />
frequencies; on the other hand, strain is a local physical quantity, with its information<br />
concentrated at lower frequencies. Wind velocity affects the input force, damping, and<br />
stiffness. Temperature and humidity change at slower rate, affecting structural<br />
characteristics. Integration of different types of information may result in more reliable<br />
damage detection.<br />
Furthermore, the applicability of the algorithms to nontruss structures needs to be<br />
examined and experimentally verified. The applicability has been studied mainly for truss<br />
structures. For DCS for SHM to be more widely used in monitoring civil infrastructure,<br />
the applicability to a wide range of structure types should be demonstrated.<br />
9.2.3 Power harvesting<br />
The three AAA batteries powering the Imote2 have a limited life. For some<br />
applications needing only a few samples taken infrequently, the batteries may last for<br />
months or even years. However, data-intensive applications such as SHM consume<br />
significant power, shortening the battery life. A battery life of years using only a few AAA<br />
batteries is not likely to be achieved in the near future. <strong>Using</strong> larger batteries is one<br />
practical solution when a small form factor is not required. The life of a smart sensor can<br />
be lengthened by increasing the battery capacity. Alternatively, power harvesting at the<br />
smart sensor nodes is a promising approach to achieve semipermanent monitoring of<br />
structures using nonplugged-in smart sensors.<br />
Several energy sources can be identified for development of SHM power harvesting<br />
strategies. Wind energy is a potential energy source. Bridges are most likely constructed<br />
over a river, street, or railroad tracks where obstacles to block the wind are limited. Wind<br />
velocities at bridge cites are expected to be relatively high, making power harvesting with<br />
wind energy promising. Solar power is another candidate, though available energy<br />
depends on the climate at the site and sunlight availability of sensor locations. As opposed<br />
to wind power, solar power harvesting does not have any moving parts; therefore,<br />
vibration originating from solar power harvesting will not contaminate measurement of<br />
structural vibration signals. Another energy source, structural vibration energy, can<br />
conceptually be converted to electrical energy. Considering that vibration of civil<br />
infrastructure is normally in the low frequency range, power harvesting from such<br />
vibration might be difficult. Devices to capture small sources of energy and condition<br />
stored energy for smart sensor use have also been reported (Advanced Linear Devices,<br />
Inc., 2007). Further study is required to use these energy sources reliably for smart<br />
sensors.<br />
Even when power harvesting is realized, power consumption on the smart sensor<br />
should be kept moderate. The amount of energy available from wind, solar power, or<br />
163