Straser, E. G. & Kiremidjian A. S. (1996). "A modular visual approach to damage monitoring for civil structures." Proceedings of SPIE - <strong>Smart</strong> Structures and Materials, San Diego, CA, 2719, 112-122. Straser, E. G. & Kiremidjian A. S. (1998). "A modular, wireless damage monitoring system for structures." The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Technical Report, 128. Studer, M. & Peters, K. (2004). “Multi-scale sensing for damage identification”, <strong>Smart</strong> Materials and Structures, 13, 283-294. Sun, C. T. and Lu, Y. P. (1995). Vibration damping of structural elements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Tang, J. P. and Leu, K. M. (1989). “Vibration tests and damage detection of P/C bridges” ICOSSAR 1989, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on <strong>Structural</strong> Safety and Reliability, ASCE, San Francisco, CA, 2263-2266. Tanner, N. A., Farrar, C. R., & Sohn, H. (2002). “<strong>Structural</strong> health monitoring using wireless sensing systems with embedded processing.” Proceedings of SPIE - NDE and <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> of Aerospace Materials and Civil Infrastructure, 4704, 215-224. Tanner, N. A., Wait, J. R., Farrar, C. R., & Sohn, H. (2003). “<strong>Structural</strong> health monitoring using modular wireless sensors.” Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 14(1), 43-56. Texas Instruments. (2007) “Is DSP Right for You?” (Mar. 2, 2007). The MathWorks, Inc. (Mar. 2, 2007). TinyOS. (Mar. 2, 2007). Toksoy, T. & Aktan, A. E. (1994). “Bridge-condition assessment by modal flexibility.” Experimental Mechanics, 34, 271-278. Vapnik, V. (1998). Statistical Learning Theory, New York: Wiley. Wang, M. L., Gu, H., Lloyd, G. M., & Zhao, Y. (2003). “A multi-channel wireless PVDF displacement sensor for structural monitoring.” Proceedings of Int. Workshop on Advanced <strong>Sensors</strong>, <strong>Structural</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong> and <strong>Smart</strong> Structures, Tokyo, Japan, 1- 6. West, W. M. (1984). “Illustration of the use of modal assurance criterion to detectstructural changes in an orbiter test specimen.” Proceedings of Air Force Conference on Aircraft <strong>Structural</strong> Integrity, 1-6. Williams, C. & Salawu, O. S. (1997). “Damping as a damage indication parameter.” Proceedings of 15th International Modal Analysis Conference, 1531-1536. Wong, K.-Y. (2004). “Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable-supported bridges.” <strong>Structural</strong> Control and <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong>, 11(2), 91-124. 177
Yi, J.-H. & Yun, C.-B. (2004). “Comparative study on modal identification methods using output-only information.” <strong>Structural</strong> Engineering and Mechanics, 17(3-4), 445-466. Yurish, S. Y. (2005) “Intelligent opto sensors’ interfacing based on universal frequencyto-digital converter.” <strong>Sensors</strong> and Transducers Magazine, 56(6), 326-334. Zhang, Z. & Atkan, A. E. (1995). “The damage indices for constructed facilities.” Proceedings of 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, 1520-1529. Zhao, F. & Guibas, L. J. (2004). Wireless sensor networks: an information processing approach. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Zhao, J., Ivan, J. N., & DeWolf, J. T. (1998). “<strong>Structural</strong> damage detection using artificial neural networks.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 4(3), 93-101. Zimmerman, D. C. & Kaouk, M. (1994). “<strong>Structural</strong> damage detection using a minimum rank update theory.” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 116, 222-230. Zimmerman, D. C. & Simmermacher, T. (1995). “Model correlation using multiple static load and vibration tests.” AIAA Journal, 33(11), 2182-2188. Zimmerman, D. C., Kaouk, M. & Simmermacher, T. (1995). “<strong>Structural</strong> damage detection using frequency response functions.” Proceedings of 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, 179-184. Zimmermann, H. (1980). “OSI reference model - the ISO model of architecture for open systems interconnection.” IEEE Trans. Communications, 28(4), 425-432. 178
- Page 1 and 2:
NSEL Report Series Report No. NSEL-
- Page 3 and 4:
The Newmark Structural Engineering
- Page 5 and 6:
Contents Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTIO
- Page 7 and 8:
9.2.3 Power harvesting . . . . . .
- Page 9 and 10:
damage/deterioration is intrinsical
- Page 11 and 12:
scalability to a large number of sm
- Page 13 and 14:
logic circuit. However, FPGAs are m
- Page 15 and 16:
easons, smart sensors spatially dis
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 2.1. EYES project sensor pro
- Page 19 and 20:
Table 2.1. Smart Sensor Specificati
- Page 21 and 22:
While a number of sensor boards for
- Page 23 and 24:
need to be within the coordinator's
- Page 25 and 26:
eing examined (Moore et al., 2001).
- Page 27 and 28:
structural damage, the analysis to
- Page 29 and 30:
that sensor installation cost inclu
- Page 31 and 32:
(2004) indicated that this accelero
- Page 33 and 34:
different type of sensors connected
- Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 3 SHM ARCHITECTURE This cha
- Page 37 and 38:
Modal operation Several modal opera
- Page 39 and 40:
its spatial gradient, which is clai
- Page 41 and 42:
Manager node Cluster head node Leaf
- Page 43 and 44:
commands; execution timing cannot b
- Page 45 and 46:
Table 3.2. Desirable Characteristic
- Page 47 and 48:
Table 3.2. Desirable Characteristic
- Page 49 and 50:
Figure 4.1. Foil strain gage. strai
- Page 51 and 52:
dB A s Figure 4.4. AA filter design
- Page 53 and 54:
8.32F 3V 3.45F 3V Input 1K 1K 1K 1K
- Page 55 and 56:
Strain ( ) 80 w/o Digital Filter 60
- Page 57 and 58:
performance was experimentally vali
- Page 59 and 60:
anges from 10 to 20. If 50 percent
- Page 61 and 62:
Node 1 x1 i =1,2,…,ns E x 1
- Page 63 and 64:
Correlation function estimate (m 2
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 5.5. Effect of data loss and
- Page 67 and 68:
Frobenius norm. Because only a limi
- Page 69 and 70:
90 80 70 60 50 Node1 Node2 Node3 No
- Page 71 and 72:
On reception of a NACK, the sender
- Page 73 and 74:
Sender SendLData.send() Pack parame
- Page 75 and 76:
If there are missing packets, the r
- Page 77 and 78:
Sender SendLData.bcast() Pack param
- Page 79 and 80:
Sender Send a packet • Sender sen
- Page 81 and 82:
utilized in SHM applications follow
- Page 83 and 84:
where R xxref is a vector consistin
- Page 85 and 86:
Time (sec) 80 60 40 20 0 -20 -40 -6
- Page 87 and 88:
Difficulties encountered in realizi
- Page 89 and 90:
1.8715 x10 5 #ofdatablocks 1.871 me
- Page 91 and 92:
Before this decimation is applied,
- Page 93 and 94:
where xn is the original signal,
- Page 95 and 96:
Timer firing every T3 110 data poin
- Page 97 and 98:
locks before or after the current b
- Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 6 ALGORITHMS In this chapte
- Page 101 and 102:
The eigenproblem of the system matr
- Page 103 and 104:
where M 0 is the mass matrix of the
- Page 105 and 106:
same community, eliminating the nee
- Page 107 and 108:
measurement or mass perturbation ca
- Page 109 and 110:
these algorithms are implemented on
- Page 111 and 112:
10 0 10 -2 10 -4 0 500 1000 1500 20
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 7.1. SVD Accuracy Check on Ma
- Page 115 and 116:
7.1.4 Complex matrix inverse A comp
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 7.9. Details of the joint (G
- Page 119 and 120:
Figure 7.13. Amplifier (Gao, 2005).
- Page 121 and 122:
0.08 0.2 Acceleration (g) 0.04 0 -0
- Page 123 and 124:
3 Imote2_2/Imote2_1 Imote2_1/Siglab
- Page 125 and 126:
200 3 Phase of spectral densities (
- Page 127 and 128:
1.5 x10-17 Time (sec) Difference in
- Page 129 and 130:
input forces applied at nodes in th
- Page 131 and 132:
CH1 CH2 CH3 …. CHn-1 CHn Initiali
- Page 133 and 134: 1 2 Node ID 102 RETAKE 1 3 4 INCONS
- Page 135 and 136: Initialization: within local sensor
- Page 137 and 138: PC Base station Manager sensor Clus
- Page 139 and 140: PC Base station Manager sensor Clus
- Page 141 and 142: PC Base station Manager sensor Clus
- Page 143 and 144: Table 7.7. Instructions in DCS Code
- Page 145 and 146: EXPERIMENTAL VERIFICATION Chapter 8
- Page 147 and 148: 8 x10-3 Time (sec) Correlation func
- Page 149 and 150: Table 8.2. Mass Normalization Const
- Page 151 and 152: 1 2 Node ID 67 RETAKE 0 3 4 ID 67 #
- Page 153 and 154: for a SHM strategy does not necessa
- Page 155 and 156: are saved. The 420 seconds listed a
- Page 157 and 158: 1 1 Normalized accumulated stress m
- Page 159 and 160: 1 1 Normalized accumulated stress m
- Page 161 and 162: 1 1 Normalized accumulated stress m
- Page 163 and 164: Table 8.5. Summary of False Damage
- Page 165 and 166: Table 8.7. Summary of False Damage
- Page 167 and 168: e scalability, autonomous distribut
- Page 169 and 170: The lowest frequencies of interest
- Page 171 and 172: structural vibration is considered
- Page 173 and 174: REFERENCES Actis, R. L. & Dimarogon
- Page 175 and 176: Casciati, F., Faravelli, L, Borghet
- Page 177 and 178: Feldman, M. & Braun, S. (1995). “
- Page 179 and 180: Kling, R. (2003). “Intel Mote: an
- Page 181 and 182: Mufti, A. A. (2003). “Integration
- Page 183: Sazonov, E., Janoyan, K., & Jha, R.