21.01.2014 Views

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

set value: 560 Hz<br />

3<br />

Count<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

520 530 540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620<br />

Sampling frequency (Hz)<br />

Figure 5.22. Sampling frequencies of 14 sensor boards.<br />

(Frequency calibration was conducted by Jennifer A. Rice.)<br />

were calibrated on a shake table (see Figure 5.22). Differences in the sampling frequencies<br />

among the sensor nodes result in inaccurate estimation of structural properties unless<br />

appropriate post processing is performed. If signals from sensors with nonuniform<br />

sampling frequency are used for modal analysis, one physical mode may be identified as<br />

several modes spread around the true natural frequency (Nagayama et al., 2006a).<br />

4. Fluctuation in sampling frequency over time<br />

A nonconstant sampling rate was observed with the Imote2 sensor boards, which if<br />

not addressed, results in a seriously degraded acceleration measurement. The Imote2<br />

receives the digital acceleration signal once a block of data is available from the<br />

accelerometer. The block size is set at 110 data points. The Imote2 puts a time stamp on<br />

the data once a block is available. By comparing differences between two consecutive<br />

time stamps, the sampling frequency of the accelerometer is estimated. The difference<br />

between the time stamps, shown in Figure 5.23, provides an indication of the variation in<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!