21.01.2014 Views

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Sensors - ideals ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

used for SHM applications, transfer and processing of this large amount of data need to be<br />

well-planned.<br />

5.1.2 Model-based data aggregation<br />

The amount of data involved in SHM applications normally exceeds practical<br />

communication capabilities of smart sensor networks if all of the measurement data needs<br />

to be collected centrally; data aggregation has been an important issue to be addressed<br />

before an SHM system employing smart sensors is realized. One approach to overcome<br />

this data aggregation problem has been an independent data processing strategy (i.e.,<br />

without internode communication). This approach, however, cannot fully exploit<br />

information available in the sensor network. Distribution of data processing and<br />

coordination among smart sensors play a central role in addressing many smart sensor<br />

implementation issues, including data aggregation. This section will demonstrate that<br />

distribution and coordination can be well-planned so that the data aggregation problem is<br />

addressed without sacrificing performance of the SHM algorithms.<br />

The auto-correlation and cross-correlation functions are the inverse Fourier transform<br />

of the PSD and CSD functions, respectively; their estimation is the beginning step of<br />

many output-only SHM algorithms. CSD estimation requires data from two sensor nodes.<br />

Measured data needs to be transmitted from one node to the other before data processing<br />

takes place. Associated data communication can be prohibitively large without careful<br />

consideration of the implementation. Distributed estimation of correlation functions is<br />

proposed in this section.<br />

Correlation functions are, in practice, estimated from finite length records. PSD and<br />

CSD functions are estimated first through the following relation (Bendat & Piersol, 2000):<br />

Ĝ xy <br />

=<br />

n d<br />

<br />

-------- X<br />

n d<br />

T i<br />

<br />

Y i<br />

<br />

i = <br />

(5.1)<br />

where Ĝ xy is an estimate of CSD G xy<br />

<br />

between two stationary Gaussian random<br />

processes, xt and yt . X and Y are the Fourier transforms of xt and yt ; *<br />

denotes the complex conjugate. T is time length of sample records, x i<br />

t and y i<br />

t . When<br />

n d<br />

= , the estimate has large random error. The random error is reduced by computing<br />

an ensemble average from n d different or partially overlapped records. The normalized<br />

RMS error <br />

Ĝ xy <br />

of the spectral density function estimation is given as<br />

<br />

Ĝ xy <br />

<br />

=<br />

<br />

------------------<br />

xy<br />

n d<br />

(5.2)<br />

xy<br />

=<br />

G xy<br />

<br />

-----------------------------------<br />

G xx<br />

G yy<br />

<br />

<br />

(5.3)<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!