Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Fall 2009 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
Figure 1. Mean height <strong>of</strong> RCBr grown in conventional<br />
soil (8.574 0.345 cm ( S.E.M, n=35) and organic<br />
soil (7.87 0.317 cm (n=39) (p= 0.067662).<br />
Figure 2. Mean cotyledon width <strong>of</strong> RCBr grown in<br />
conventional soil (1.72 0.0371 cm and organic soil<br />
(1.11 0.0270 cm (p= 3.2x 10 -20 ).<br />
Discussion<br />
The data and results show that there is a<br />
difference in all categories tested between the two<br />
groups with, organic soil germinating in 100% <strong>of</strong> seeds<br />
planted(39 germinators out <strong>of</strong> 39 sown), while<br />
conventional only 97.2% (35 germinators out <strong>of</strong> 36<br />
sown). In addition to this the conventional soil also<br />
yielded plants with greater averages in all <strong>of</strong> the other<br />
three measured categories. In regards to germination<br />
and height values there was no significant, statistical<br />
difference between the two groups, therefore, in the<br />
two categories with statistical differences, conventional<br />
soil proves to be the better growth medium. The RCBr<br />
grown in conventional soil had cotyledons which<br />
radically outgrew those grown in organic soil, and the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> flowers in the conventional soil group also<br />
outnumbered those in the organic soil group. Therefore<br />
the results <strong>of</strong> this particular experiment indicate that<br />
the hypothesis being tested was incorrect. The<br />
conventional soil is specifically engineered for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> optimal plant growth, as an alternative to<br />
organic soil. Even in RCBr, which requires low<br />
nutrient levels and is easily sustainable, the<br />
conventional soil allowed for better growth. Other than<br />
the growth medium, all variables in this experiment<br />
were kept constant except for one; the pH content <strong>of</strong><br />
each soil. Although RCBr is assumed to grow better in<br />
a more basic environment (Carolina Lab Supply,<br />
2009), the greater pH <strong>of</strong> the organic soil did not affect<br />
the hypothesis. There is some possible error on the part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the researchers however as the conventional soil<br />
used in the experiment had fertilizers added while the<br />
organic soil had none. This variance in the growth<br />
medium may have had a large impact on the results <strong>of</strong><br />
this study. It is for this reason that further research is<br />
encouraged in order to confirm these results. In<br />
addition if this experiment were to be expanded on, soil<br />
pH should be measured beforehand and altered to be<br />
made constant and the null hypothesis assumed.<br />
Literature Cited<br />
Butrum, R. R., Chang, F. H., & Leung, W.-T. W.<br />
(1972). Food Composition Table For Use in East Asia.<br />
Retrieved<br />
October 01, 2009, from Food and Agricultural<br />
Organization <strong>of</strong> the United Nations:<br />
http://www.fao.org/docrep/003/x6878e/x6878e00.HT<br />
M<br />
Figure 3. Mean number <strong>of</strong> flowers <strong>of</strong> RCBr grown in<br />
conventional soil (4.08 0.423 flowers (n=35) and<br />
organic soil (2.51 0.115 flowers (n=39). (p=<br />
0.00045796).<br />
Carolina Lab Supply. (2009). Wisconsin Fast Plants<br />
Standard Brassica rapa Seed. Retrieved September 15,<br />
2009, from<br />
http://www.carolina.com/product/158804.do?KickerID<br />
=int_t_sgt_wfp_brassicarapaseed<br />
96<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010