Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />
pattern, as no mentions are made pertaining to the<br />
spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> resources. In an effort to<br />
differentiate those feeding area distributions from the<br />
arrangement which existed in this study, researchers<br />
have termed areas with mixed source, widely-spaced<br />
feeding areas “natural/artificial decentralized feeding<br />
areas,” or NADFA, and areas with a centrally located<br />
and artificial source as “artificial concentrated feeding<br />
areas”, or ACFA. In this study, researchers are<br />
interested in studying whether the frequency <strong>of</strong> highcost<br />
territorial displays and resource availability so<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten studied in NADFA also exists in ACFA with a<br />
dense population <strong>of</strong> feeding hummingbirds. Though<br />
the density <strong>of</strong> hummingbirds and space limitations<br />
differ from previous studies, the type <strong>of</strong> behaviors<br />
displayed by individuals can only exist as far as their<br />
energy budget. It is therefore hypothesized that when<br />
resources are depressed, a lower frequency <strong>of</strong> highintensity<br />
behaviors will be exhibited.<br />
Method and Materials<br />
This study was conducted at a residential<br />
three-and-a-half acre avocado grove located in<br />
Bonsall, CA, for a duration <strong>of</strong> four days during mid-<br />
March 2010. The daytime temperatures averaged<br />
between 22.8-23.9 o C and wind speeds averaged<br />
3.5mph. The hummingbird feeders were located on the<br />
residences’ back porch, facing the lower half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
avocado grove. Based on years <strong>of</strong> observations and<br />
the abundance <strong>of</strong> occupied and abandoned nests<br />
discovered on the premises by grove owners, the home<br />
range (Brown and Orians, 1970) <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong><br />
Anna’s hummingbirds studied remains within the<br />
grove’s perimeter and possibly within adjacent lots.<br />
These “resident” hummingbirds have been provided<br />
with nine large commercial feeders containing a<br />
consistent supply <strong>of</strong> an approximately 1.16M sucrose<br />
solution for the past six years. Each feeder has seven<br />
feeding stations resembling a red and yellow flower<br />
and has the capacity to hold 0.960L <strong>of</strong> solution. While<br />
these resident hummingbirds are not tagged and no<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial counts have been made, it is estimated by<br />
grove owners that the Anna’s population numbers<br />
between 100-200 individuals, depending on the<br />
season. Other species <strong>of</strong> hummingbirds, such as<br />
Rufous, Black-Chinned, and Calliope, have<br />
additionally been observed residing on the grove but<br />
only in seasonal durations. Researchers <strong>of</strong> this study<br />
took great care in assuring that videotaping was<br />
completed prior to the migrational introduction <strong>of</strong> non-<br />
Anna’s species.<br />
The residence’s partially enclosed back porch<br />
uses five large evenly spaced pillars for support; two<br />
outside pillars and three middle pillars. Attached to the<br />
trim between each middle pillar are three hooks for the<br />
suspension hummingbird feeders. Nine total feeders<br />
are supported by this arrangement. As the resident<br />
hummingbirds are accustomed to nine feeders (or 63<br />
feeding stations) at any given time, researchers<br />
considered this arrangement “high-resource”<br />
availability. When only three feeders were provided, a<br />
66% depression in resources, it was considered “lowresource”<br />
availability.<br />
Maintaining a consistent sucrose content for each day<br />
<strong>of</strong> the study, the researchers designated the first and<br />
third days <strong>of</strong> the study as high-resource and the second<br />
and fourth days as low-resource. The spaces<br />
immediately between the three middle pillars were<br />
successively videotaped for 40 minutes each day<br />
resulting in a total <strong>of</strong> eight hours <strong>of</strong> footage: four<br />
hours <strong>of</strong> high-resource footage and four hours <strong>of</strong> lowresource<br />
footage. Afterwards the footage was<br />
analyzed and each incident <strong>of</strong> territoriality exhibited<br />
next to a feeder quantified and categorized as either a<br />
high-intensity or low-intensity display based on the<br />
behavioral descriptions <strong>of</strong> previous studies (Ewald and<br />
Orians, 1982; Ewald and Carpenter, 1978; Brown,<br />
1969). According to Brown and Orians 1970’s study, a<br />
territory is defined as “…a fixed area, which may<br />
change slightly over a period <strong>of</strong> time, [where] acts <strong>of</strong><br />
territorial defense by the possessors evoke escape and<br />
avoidance in rivals so that…the area becomes an<br />
exclusive area with respect to rivals.” The intent <strong>of</strong><br />
this study was to focus on the territorial displays<br />
exhibited strictly at the ACFA, therefore researchers<br />
did not examine the territorial spatial distributions <strong>of</strong><br />
areas outside the ACFA’s perimeter. Researchers<br />
defined the area between two pillars as a territory,<br />
which is approximately 340 cubic feet.<br />
For purposes <strong>of</strong> quantifying low-and-highintensity<br />
chase occurrences, researchers designed the<br />
following: (1) low-intensity chases were those which<br />
remained within the scope <strong>of</strong> the camera lens, since a<br />
defending hummingbird need only chase an intruding<br />
hummingbird a relatively short distance in order to<br />
ensure the invader leaves the territory; and (2) highintensity<br />
chases were considered those which<br />
continued beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the camera lens, as<br />
more energy was needed by defenders to chase<br />
intruders the longer distance. Gorget displays,<br />
typically the first territorial behavior exhibited by<br />
hummingbirds before increasing the severity <strong>of</strong> their<br />
warnings (Sibley, 2001), and consequently the<br />
associated energy allocation, are distinctive enough<br />
low-cost behaviors that researchers needed only to<br />
use conventional descriptions in order to recognize<br />
and quantify occurrences. According to Ewald and<br />
Orians’ 1982 study, gorget displays are “an<br />
energetically inexpensive method <strong>of</strong> defense in which<br />
the owner moves its head from side to side while<br />
facing the intruder.” Males additionally flash the<br />
fuchsia colored iridescent feathers on their crowns to<br />
8<br />
<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />
Spring 2010