23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

pattern, as no mentions are made pertaining to the<br />

spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> resources. In an effort to<br />

differentiate those feeding area distributions from the<br />

arrangement which existed in this study, researchers<br />

have termed areas with mixed source, widely-spaced<br />

feeding areas “natural/artificial decentralized feeding<br />

areas,” or NADFA, and areas with a centrally located<br />

and artificial source as “artificial concentrated feeding<br />

areas”, or ACFA. In this study, researchers are<br />

interested in studying whether the frequency <strong>of</strong> highcost<br />

territorial displays and resource availability so<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten studied in NADFA also exists in ACFA with a<br />

dense population <strong>of</strong> feeding hummingbirds. Though<br />

the density <strong>of</strong> hummingbirds and space limitations<br />

differ from previous studies, the type <strong>of</strong> behaviors<br />

displayed by individuals can only exist as far as their<br />

energy budget. It is therefore hypothesized that when<br />

resources are depressed, a lower frequency <strong>of</strong> highintensity<br />

behaviors will be exhibited.<br />

Method and Materials<br />

This study was conducted at a residential<br />

three-and-a-half acre avocado grove located in<br />

Bonsall, CA, for a duration <strong>of</strong> four days during mid-<br />

March 2010. The daytime temperatures averaged<br />

between 22.8-23.9 o C and wind speeds averaged<br />

3.5mph. The hummingbird feeders were located on the<br />

residences’ back porch, facing the lower half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

avocado grove. Based on years <strong>of</strong> observations and<br />

the abundance <strong>of</strong> occupied and abandoned nests<br />

discovered on the premises by grove owners, the home<br />

range (Brown and Orians, 1970) <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong><br />

Anna’s hummingbirds studied remains within the<br />

grove’s perimeter and possibly within adjacent lots.<br />

These “resident” hummingbirds have been provided<br />

with nine large commercial feeders containing a<br />

consistent supply <strong>of</strong> an approximately 1.16M sucrose<br />

solution for the past six years. Each feeder has seven<br />

feeding stations resembling a red and yellow flower<br />

and has the capacity to hold 0.960L <strong>of</strong> solution. While<br />

these resident hummingbirds are not tagged and no<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial counts have been made, it is estimated by<br />

grove owners that the Anna’s population numbers<br />

between 100-200 individuals, depending on the<br />

season. Other species <strong>of</strong> hummingbirds, such as<br />

Rufous, Black-Chinned, and Calliope, have<br />

additionally been observed residing on the grove but<br />

only in seasonal durations. Researchers <strong>of</strong> this study<br />

took great care in assuring that videotaping was<br />

completed prior to the migrational introduction <strong>of</strong> non-<br />

Anna’s species.<br />

The residence’s partially enclosed back porch<br />

uses five large evenly spaced pillars for support; two<br />

outside pillars and three middle pillars. Attached to the<br />

trim between each middle pillar are three hooks for the<br />

suspension hummingbird feeders. Nine total feeders<br />

are supported by this arrangement. As the resident<br />

hummingbirds are accustomed to nine feeders (or 63<br />

feeding stations) at any given time, researchers<br />

considered this arrangement “high-resource”<br />

availability. When only three feeders were provided, a<br />

66% depression in resources, it was considered “lowresource”<br />

availability.<br />

Maintaining a consistent sucrose content for each day<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study, the researchers designated the first and<br />

third days <strong>of</strong> the study as high-resource and the second<br />

and fourth days as low-resource. The spaces<br />

immediately between the three middle pillars were<br />

successively videotaped for 40 minutes each day<br />

resulting in a total <strong>of</strong> eight hours <strong>of</strong> footage: four<br />

hours <strong>of</strong> high-resource footage and four hours <strong>of</strong> lowresource<br />

footage. Afterwards the footage was<br />

analyzed and each incident <strong>of</strong> territoriality exhibited<br />

next to a feeder quantified and categorized as either a<br />

high-intensity or low-intensity display based on the<br />

behavioral descriptions <strong>of</strong> previous studies (Ewald and<br />

Orians, 1982; Ewald and Carpenter, 1978; Brown,<br />

1969). According to Brown and Orians 1970’s study, a<br />

territory is defined as “…a fixed area, which may<br />

change slightly over a period <strong>of</strong> time, [where] acts <strong>of</strong><br />

territorial defense by the possessors evoke escape and<br />

avoidance in rivals so that…the area becomes an<br />

exclusive area with respect to rivals.” The intent <strong>of</strong><br />

this study was to focus on the territorial displays<br />

exhibited strictly at the ACFA, therefore researchers<br />

did not examine the territorial spatial distributions <strong>of</strong><br />

areas outside the ACFA’s perimeter. Researchers<br />

defined the area between two pillars as a territory,<br />

which is approximately 340 cubic feet.<br />

For purposes <strong>of</strong> quantifying low-and-highintensity<br />

chase occurrences, researchers designed the<br />

following: (1) low-intensity chases were those which<br />

remained within the scope <strong>of</strong> the camera lens, since a<br />

defending hummingbird need only chase an intruding<br />

hummingbird a relatively short distance in order to<br />

ensure the invader leaves the territory; and (2) highintensity<br />

chases were considered those which<br />

continued beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> the camera lens, as<br />

more energy was needed by defenders to chase<br />

intruders the longer distance. Gorget displays,<br />

typically the first territorial behavior exhibited by<br />

hummingbirds before increasing the severity <strong>of</strong> their<br />

warnings (Sibley, 2001), and consequently the<br />

associated energy allocation, are distinctive enough<br />

low-cost behaviors that researchers needed only to<br />

use conventional descriptions in order to recognize<br />

and quantify occurrences. According to Ewald and<br />

Orians’ 1982 study, gorget displays are “an<br />

energetically inexpensive method <strong>of</strong> defense in which<br />

the owner moves its head from side to side while<br />

facing the intruder.” Males additionally flash the<br />

fuchsia colored iridescent feathers on their crowns to<br />

8<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!