23.02.2014 Views

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

Saddleback Journal of Biology - Saddleback College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Spring 2010 <strong>Biology</strong> 3B Paper<br />

Introduction<br />

Aromatic plants, such as Rosemary,<br />

Lavender, Oregano, and Thyme have long been<br />

valued for the medicinal and aromatic uses <strong>of</strong> their<br />

essential oil extractions. In addition, a number <strong>of</strong><br />

studies undertaken in the last twenty five years have<br />

looked at the antibacterial properties these plants<br />

possess. The bird species, blue tit (Cyanistes<br />

caerulas) has been found to include pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

aromatic plants amongst its normal nest building<br />

material (Blondel et al. 2009). Upon examination <strong>of</strong><br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> these plants on the bacteria present on<br />

the blue tits, it was found that the plants significantly<br />

altered the structure <strong>of</strong> the observed bacterial<br />

communities specifically in regards to reducing the<br />

density <strong>of</strong> colonies among hatchlings (Blondel et al.<br />

2009). Variability in antibacterial activity has also<br />

been noted in these plants due to a variance in<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> essential oils specifically in regards<br />

to ice nucleation active bacteria (Karamanoli et al.,<br />

2004). In regards to the effects <strong>of</strong> these plants on<br />

specific bacterial strains, the aromatic plant basil<br />

(Ocimum basillicum) has been shown to be effective<br />

in inhibiting the growth <strong>of</strong> E coli. (Lopez et al.,<br />

2005). Essential oils appear to derive their<br />

antibacterial effect from their unique chemical<br />

makeup. Each single, pure essential oil consists <strong>of</strong><br />

several, sometimes hundreds <strong>of</strong> distinct natural<br />

chemicals. Essential oils, like all organic compounds,<br />

are made up <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbon molecules and can<br />

further be classified as terpenes, alcohols, esters,<br />

aldehydes, ketones and phenols. The primary<br />

components known for their antibacterial activity are<br />

Terpene hydrocarbons such as Sesquiterpenes.<br />

Also, there are a few oxygenated compounds known<br />

as phenols. These components have great antiseptic,<br />

anti-bacterial and disinfectant qualities and also have<br />

greatly stimulating therapeutic properties.<br />

Relatively few studies have directly looked<br />

at the variance in effect that different essential oil<br />

extracts from these aromatic plants have on bacterial<br />

growth. The objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to observe<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> growth inhibition <strong>of</strong> Escheridia coli.<br />

from the application <strong>of</strong> Lavender and Rosemary<br />

essential oils and whether the two differed<br />

significantly in their inhibition ability. It was<br />

hypothesized that both groups would significantly<br />

inhibit bacterial growth and that they would<br />

significantly vary between each other in the amount<br />

<strong>of</strong> inhibition<br />

minutes. Three, single hole punch chads <strong>of</strong> filter<br />

paper were prepared for each Petri dish for a total <strong>of</strong><br />

90, these were subsequently autoclaved for forty five<br />

minutes. 20mL <strong>of</strong> Escherichia coli, E.coli.<br />

(precultured in the microbiology lab a few days prior)<br />

was distributed in 0.5mL increments to each dish in a<br />

lawn spread using a sterile spreader and standard<br />

procedure aseptic techniques, left over E. coli was<br />

disposed <strong>of</strong> properly. The 30 dishes were split into<br />

three groups: the control group, the rosemary group,<br />

and the lavender group. Three chads were placed on<br />

each dish using tweezers. Control group chads were<br />

dipped in water, whereas rosemary and lavender<br />

group chads were dipped in essential oil extracts <strong>of</strong><br />

rosemary and lavender respectively. Oil extracts were<br />

sterilized via boiling and standard procedure Aseptic<br />

techniques were followed in transferring the chads to<br />

dish. All groups were incubated for 48 hours at a<br />

temperature <strong>of</strong> 37° Celsius. Upon removal from<br />

incubation, growth inhibition was measured as the<br />

diameter <strong>of</strong> E. coli absence across the center <strong>of</strong> the<br />

chads.<br />

Results<br />

Before evaluating the data, the diameter<br />

length <strong>of</strong> the Chad was subtracted from each<br />

measured zone <strong>of</strong> inhibition in order to get an<br />

accurate measurement. The average zone <strong>of</strong><br />

inhibition on E.coli between the three groups was<br />

analyzed for comparison. The rosemary group had<br />

the greatest average growth inhibition at 2.91 mm ±<br />

.414 (± S.E.M) with the lavender group close behind<br />

at 2.45mm ± .546 (± S.E.M). As expected the control<br />

group had the smallest average, .14 mm ± .070 (±<br />

S.E.M) (Figure 1). Although the rosemary group had<br />

the largest average zone <strong>of</strong> inhibition, as seen in<br />

figure 1, it was found to have no statistical difference<br />

when compared to the lavender group (p= 4.2 x 10 -1 ,<br />

ANOVA). However, when the rosemary group was<br />

examined against the control group there was a<br />

significant statistical difference (p= 3.2 x 10 -4 ,<br />

ANOVA). The results were also similar when the<br />

lavender group was compared to the control (p=3.0 x<br />

10 -4 , ANOVA).<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

1L <strong>of</strong> agar medium (Criterion Dehydrated Culture<br />

Media) was prepared and autoclaved for forty five<br />

minutes. The agar was then distributed evenly to 30<br />

petri dishes and allowed to cool for a period <strong>of</strong> forty<br />

33<br />

<strong>Saddleback</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Biology</strong><br />

Spring 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!